Arizona Grand Jury Indicts Donald Trump Allies, 11 Fake Electors

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Patricio Da Silva, Apr 24, 2024.

  1. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    32,721
    Likes Received:
    17,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Are there convictions for every murder? Does that fact mean the murders were not committed? Your logic wanes. The salient FACT was it was adjudicated as insurrection, and NONE of the judges AND justices contested the finding of fact by the lower court.

    Smith didn't prosecute 'insurrection' because there was none, most likely because he couldn't get it done before the election.. Who knows, he might add it later.
     
  2. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,953
    Likes Received:
    39,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There are not convictions for murder when there wasn't one. The salient fact is no one has been charged with such a crime ESPECIALLY Trump and your wishing he had been does not make him guilty of it. You don't speak for Smith, if you are claiming he didn't do something for a reason then PROVE, quote him saying so.
     
  3. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,953
    Likes Received:
    39,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you agree the "fake elector scheme" had nothing to do with the riot that occured Jan 6.
     
  4. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Never claimed it did. This thread is about the fake elector scheme. Specifically in Arizona. Catch up. All you are doing is admitting that your Jan 6 stuff is off topic.
     
  5. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,953
    Likes Received:
    39,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Then I don't think you even know what you are claiming.
     
  6. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,939
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I very much do. So would you if you actually read my post. It isn't long or complicated. But keep pretending you can't understand.
     
  7. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    32,721
    Likes Received:
    17,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Then you no knowledge about how prosecutors decide to prosecute.
    They prosecute based on whether or not they believe they can convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Lot's of things are factored beyond the mere fact that the murder was a murder. There might be plenty of evidence murder was committed, but not enough evidence to convict someone.
    We saw him incite a mob.

    Now go away.
     
  8. WalterSobchak

    WalterSobchak Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    24,807
    Likes Received:
    21,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks for proving my fact.
     
  9. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,953
    Likes Received:
    39,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What fact? When did I state that ANY President had ever called for anyone to come to DC and engage in an insurrection? YOU name one that ever has.
     
  10. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,953
    Likes Received:
    39,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I have as much as you and your claiming to have superior refutes nothing I have posted.

    You, nor the Special Prosecutor, nor the Jan. 6 Committee, nor the NYT, nor MSNBC, nor CNN, nor Woodward and Bernstein nor anyone else showed Trump inciting a riot. Please stay and post me the quote or video or Tweet that incited a riot and explain why on earth he would want to do so when it stymied his plans to legally challenge the voting, a challenge with little chance for success but a legal one nonetheless.

    Tell me how was the riot suppose to facilitate Trump remaining in power and post the evidence that was the plan they were implementing. Once the guy in the wooly horned headress took the podium how was power going to remain with Trump by force?
     

Share This Page