Obama signs Executive Order Banning Black Republicans (SATIRE) Barak Obama has signed a new executive order banning Africian Americans from voting for Republicans. White House spokesperson Jay Carney stated that it was a bold move towards progress in America. "African Americans who vote Republican suffer from a type of political Stockholm Syndrome, and do a great disservice to both themselves, and fellow African Americans. In addition to that, they disrupt the narrative that republicans hate black people, which is simply unacceptable. We need to have every African American voter voting for the Democrats, who are the only party that truly cares about them, as evidenced by such programs as SNAP and TANF and of course, the Obama phones. Currently we only have 97.9% of the African American vote, and this EO will work to remedy that." He continued, "We are all Americans, living in the a free country, and we all have a duty to vote for whoever has a "D" next to their name, and if you are an African American, you have a moral obligation to your people to vote the correct way." A reporter then asked, "If we are all Americians, why do you keep referring to black Americans as African Americans?" Carney replied with, "Well, I'm afraid we are out of time for questions today. I hope everyone is onboard with this latest EO, and God Bless America!"
"I knew it! I knew that eventually Barack would cease pretending to give a damn about the Constitution and just--" Uh . . . Gatewood ol' buddy, it's a piece of satire. "What?" Satire . . . s-a-t-i-r-e. That means it didn't actually happen. "Oh . . . Damn, and I was on a roll!"
It's satire because you don't need an executive order to stop black people from voting Republican... the GOP platform and rhetoric take care of that.
Weeeeeeeeeeellllllllllllllll . . . having the bulk of the nation's Mainstream Media effectively functioning as the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party actually 'splains most of it. All those George Soros funded graduates from their various schools of journalism. Whatever they tell the typical low-information Dem Party voter . . . those voters BELIEVE. Finest kind!
What's hilarious is that the right-wing still holds onto that tired canard about the evil librul media even though the "media" is largely owned by a few corporations that are uber-friendly to the GOP's stance on things AND at the same time the right-wing loves to crow about how FoxNews has much higher ratings than other news outlets.
You mean the same Right friendly media that campaigned for Barack Obama in 2008? Their collective Obamagasm generating leg tingles included at no extra charge? Back then one could not tell the difference between MSNBC -- which is openly a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party -- and the worshipful news coverage for Barack Obama of the Big Three broadcast networks. The anti-ethical basturds even gave Barack the longest and most loving free press pass honeymoon period ever seen for a new president . . . pretty much all of 2009.
Talk about propaganda... Media coverage of the 2012 election was fair and balanced after all "Overall, media coverage of Obama and Romney was actually fair and balanced. No, really. This is the sort of statement that tends to make partisans on both sides irritable. (Because of this.) But when we examined General Sentiment’s measure of how positive or negative coverage of Obama and Romney was, neither candidate had a chronic advantage. Here’s our graph from the fall campaign:" Let me guess, any news channel that didn't run 24/7 of "Bhengazi" in 2012 (yes I know when it occurred) was in Obama's "pocket," amirite?
Well....maybe because it's true? Check out Rachael & Mr Tingles ratings in their time slot. Very telling. http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/05/05/cable-news-ratings-for-monday-may-4-2015/399278/
