It could not be a plane because it moved east of the north tower only two seconds before the explosion, in addition to the fact that it's smaller than a chopper.
troughers think that demanding they prove all their bogus claims magically shifts the burden of proof on truthers, now that is some sort of twisted
A digital concoction perchance ? LOL Perhaps they were leaving their options open just in case a Mormon became Prez .............
From how many sources ? How many different films are there of it ? Names of cameramen/photographers please ?
There was NO 'orb',seven...All you're doing is engaging in mental(?) masturbation,using out of focus video of the planes to justify your 'orb' lie.
all the rest of the videos that have been allowed into the public are fake or modified and there are clips with nothing at all, your ground level photo shows it exploded from the inside out how about reverse explosions to accommodate a plane? on this one fuzzy makes no difference and they are hung, nothing to dispute well except troughers will probably claim the pilot has a fuzzball in his crack or some other ridiculous crap like that just to troll as they always do
and it was fully accepted narrative by SANE society that the world is flat, so what was your point again?
but when there is this much disinfo out here you really need to be able to recognize what you are looking at as something that fits. Like the pic I posted above, like the pic you posted from the ground showing it was blown from the inside out (and there are others btw) Lots of fun fakes they made to confuse everyone. Now these are a bit more difficult for them to lie out of see thats not a fireball explosion I dont even bother trying to prove it to the peanut gallery because its a waste of time when its so much easier to show how incredulous troughers are elsewhere. seriously does it get any better than this?
There were definitely objects seen by witnesses. To say there was nothing is a mistake for sure. Had the media ignored the orb or dismissed it as an artifact, that would be different. They ultimately called it the plane, which is bat (*)(*)(*)(*) crazy. They gave the truth all it really needs, but truthers won't tell the truth, just like them ignoring that Greer obviously shot jfk.
if you get a clear vid of that you can see it was a reflection off of mcarthys qball head not a flash from a gun. take a drive down there someday and pay attention to the sewer on the curve, have someone hold up a stick with the heights. paints a whole new picture. people may have saw something however that does not mean the correct label is being put on what they saw. Since the government lies anbout everything (literally) no one has any reason to believe anything they put up as fact until proven, and of course it will never be, because after all they are government and the people are expected to believe anything trash they throw out here, just look at the troughers how hard they try to keep everything in the plausible zone LOL
And what happened when it was the accepted narrative by sane society? People set out and proved, using scientific method, and exploration, that the world was not flat. After it as proven, the world being round is now the proven accepted narrative. So now that you've failed in doing anything other than proving my point, care to back up your claims? Following your example we have everything we need to get started. 1st Accepted Narrative: Earth is flat 2nd Accepted Narrative: 19 Islamic terrorists hijacked 4 planes, crashed 2 into the WTC, 1 into the pentagon and 1 into a field. 1st method to prove accepted narrative is false: Man ships to travel around the world, proving that the earth is not flat. During that time they brought back gifts of proof of other countries. During one such travel they discovered new land, which we call America. 2nd method to prove accepted narrative is false: YOUTOOB AND .GIFS!!!! Duh See the disconnect? Provide factual evidence that the accepted narrative is false, not just ridiculous comparisons.
thats because people back then were forced by the government to accept the narrative without the government proving it. Today people demand prove of government narratives BEFORE they accept it, hence the burden of proof stays with the government. Whats the major malfunction here that troughers cannot wrap their heads around such a simplistic procedure.
That is the dumbest thing I think I've ever heard. So they're forced, by the government, to accept the narrative without the government proving it. However, the same (*)(*)(*)(*)ing government, approved the usage and funding of their boats, food and water to enable the government ships to get out on the ocean to discover other lands. Which in turn proved that the earth wasn't flat. That is what you're sticking with? This is the best idea that you came up with when you read my post? And it has been proven. It has been peer reviewed by, not only other scientists, but entire academic institutes. Universities that have no ties to the government, and no reliance on them to provide government funding. You still think you're part of some main stream group of people that doesn't accept the NIST report, etc. You aren't koko, you and your ilk are what's called a "fringe group of society." Less than 1% of the professionals in the entire world, with educations equipping them to be able to understand the disaster, believe that the government was involved in anyway. It is not on anyone to prove your negative. It is on you to provide evidence to prove that the NIST report is false. So far, you've sucked at it. This is just more of your games though Koko, everyone sees through your little charade. The main malfunction is "troughers" don't tour around pretending to be something they aren't, while trying to get attention. They don't make completely ridiculous claims and attempt to pass them off as fact. They don't make up complete lies, and then require their opposition to prove them wrong. You're wrong. Call me a shill, call me a government agent, call me whatever you'd like. None of it will change the fact that you have no idea what you're talking about in regards to 9/11. You're either lying, naive, misinformed, or all of the above. There are no other answers.
nothing will change the fact that you only parrot the government "story" and its as believable as the tooth fairy. way back in 06 there were more than 30% of the people that did not believe you and that number is consistently growing because you people seem t think they are stupid. well they arent. yeh in those days it was a religion and if the state said it was a flat earth then damit it was a flat earth - - - Updated - - - now that is funny dont give them any ideas!
Wrong. You think so, but numbers prove you wrong. Let's look at the US alone. 30% back in 2006. That would be 90,000,000 people. If that number is "growing", why; - Does the 9/11 anniversary protest at ground zero yield less and less people each year? In 2006, there were a few hundred. In 2011, there was around 150. Last year, 2012, there were less than 40. - Did 'rememberbuilding7' fail to ever raise more than 8% of their goal? - Did 'occupy building 7' fail to get more than 30 people, even when thousands of pissed off teenagers were protesting corporate greed right around the corner at the same time? - Did the 'Toronto hearings' get less than 100 attendants and achieve absolutely nothing? - Did the 'Vancouver hearings' get even less? - Why Richard Gage's supporter petition have less than 20,000 signatures? - Why almost every 9/11 fund-raiser finishes well below its target, even after being extended by months over its finish date? - Why no one talks about 9/11 conspiracies outside of the Internet? - Why there are not marches of thousands (or your alleged millions) of people periodically on the capital, or in any city in the US? or even in the world? - Why every 'new 9/11 investigation now' White House petition fails to reach more than 100 signatures? Even though in the same time allowance, a UFO petition got over 20,000 signatures? I'm very interested as to why your 90 million people, and "growing" do so little to support their belief?
As I said, Koko. You appear to be under the impression that you're apart of this vast movement. The Truth movement is dead. It hasn't come up with anything new in years and everything it's had has been debunked with ease. The last thread of hope was the Bentham paper, and Millette destroyed that thing. It's over.
so just because 90 million people arent at rallys every saturday you think its over. you think they changed their minds. you think they have not found alternative methods Does not change the fact that 60% of the people believe gubbermint is the cause of the problems you think they should all check in with you you cant get more flimsy than what you are pushing here man its frankly laughable what a waste of bandwidth lmao
