http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/0...ratives-on-the-ground-during-benghazi-attack/ Are they trying to cover up arms smuggling operations? Keep in mind Syria didn't use WMD's prior to Benghazi so then why were we arming the Muslim rebels? Liberals on this site exclaimed "why would Obama want to cover anything up" They said Republicans were fear mongering. Apparently not.
And if the USA were keeping cover on a important clandestine anti-terrorist or intelligence-action against enemies operation? Should they just throw away a whole program, more lives, perhaps endanger a host of people who may have been working with us in order to run over and try to maybe save the consulate, the occupants of which were probably already dead anyway? Large scale military operations often require choices of that kind. Fortunately for us, some people may be keeping their eyes on a bigger ball than sacrificing everything for just providing a minor embarrassment for Obama. The Obama-haters don't care how much damage they do to our country in their quest to regain power. It is a good thing they are NOT in power.
Large scale military operations often require adequate security. This wasn't a military action. This was a CIA mission to fix what the State Department (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up. We should not have armed the Libyans, many affiliated with AQ. This would be why the CIA didn't handle the thing to begin with... it was a stupid stupid thing to do. The ONLY reason for the state department involvement is because it was at their behest.
Are you really suggesting that smuggling arms to Al Qaeda affiliated rebels in Syria is an "anti terrorist" operation? This isn't stretching the truth, to give cover to the guilty. It's obliterating it! Funny and typical that in order to save an illegal program designed to help the people (jihadist terrorists) that we've been told we are opposing, you don't object to some people dying. Just not the people helping Al Qaeda assume power. That's about as sick as it gets. Do you understand what it is you are defending? Or is it just important to you that Dear Leader not be opposed, no matter what he is doing? The "bigger ball" is a joke and it's in direct opposition to what Obama professes in public and in front of the cameras. Considering you are defending the running of arms, illegally, to terrorists so they can take power in Syria, after Obama also aided the Muslim Brotherhood in capturing Egypt, it's very easy to see who is really damaging this nation. I can't really say what I think about someone who is tearing this nation down in order to prop up a hollow, corrosive ass we have as president.
I've never seen such an obvious 11th hour October Surprise GOP election manuever get carried on for so long as "actual news". Beating this dead horse is only hurting the GOP, boring the general public and shining a light of suspicion on the GOP and not the democrats. It's having the reverse effect. Hint: let it go before the stench sticks to you permanently...
Then explain this; http://libertyunyielding.com/2013/0...tives-to-ensure-they-stay-silent-on-benghazi/ Or explain this; http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...ed-sign-non-disclosure-agreements_739975.html If it's a dead horse why are they working so hard to keep the public from knowing the truth?
Obammy is a Shiite Muslim supporter or more, he always supports the Shiite's. His father and step father were Shiite. Dreams from my father and all of that.
It goes further than that, Sly. The survivors have been dispersed around the nation and some have undergone name changes. http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/08...benghazi-survivors-changing-their-names-80825
Talking point??? Where do you come up with this (*)(*)(*)(*) and what does that have to do with the last two elections? You deny he sympathizes with Shiite Muslims? You deny his father and step father were Shiite Muslims?
