Big Tech keeps trying to silence conservatives and it won't stop until we stop them

….President Trump correctly and rightfully detailed how Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg dumped nearly half a billion of his Zuckerbucks into left-wing political groups to "fortify" nationwide mail-in voting, ballot drop boxes and ballot harvesting ahead of the 2020 election. All of it clearly ripe for fraud and abuse, as has been noted by the bipartisan Carter-Baker report.

However, most of the content from CPAC 2022 that was cancelled by YouTube had nothing to do with election security or the crazy notion that one citizen should cast one secure vote.

To censor the diverse variety of speakers and topics featured at CPAC this year under the broad brush of "election integrity" is a malicious lie from YouTube and a bold move to bend its user policies to target one specific political group.

• • 
    

How do discussions about the sanctity of life violate YouTube’s "election integrity" policies? Do radical ideas like supporting the Constitution or reducing incarceration rates have anything to do with election security? Does calling out Putin’s thuggery violate YouTube’s terms and conditions? What about conversations about the troubling rise of anti-Semitism in the Democratic Party?

Big Tech’s leftist intellectual lightweights headquartered in Silicon Valley no longer bother with debate—the free exchange of ideas and information is a problem when you’re attempting to brainwash the masses. ….







Read more: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/big-tech-silence-conservatives-matt-schlapp








Big Tech social media knows no decency. It’s attempt to censor conservatives and our thoughts and ideas are known to all objective observers. They are publishers and editors now, not idea sharing platforms by their own actions.

 

The author is right! It is time to end big tech content control, censorship, and intolerance toward Christianity and conservatives. MBFC is trying to make itself along with Wikipedia into a tool of bigots and small minded people to stifle the expression of Evangelical Christian and conservative thought, beliefs, ideas, and values.

 

here is another one of a vet who got censored by LinkedIn of all places.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/big-tech-linkedin-air-force-veteran-college-debt

just over a comment on college debt forgiveness. She said she is not responsible for others college debt. And got the boot.

I have already stopped all my accounts on Facebook and Twitter about 8 years ago and I may have to do it on LinkedIn as well. It’s a shame. I really liked that site.

 

how much did Trump and his buddies drop, sadly the rich drop much more into politics than any of us do - why is that legal for any of them

https://www.thoughtco.com/current-political-campaign-contribution-limits-3322056

"The amount an individual can contribute to a candidate for each election was increased to $2,800 per election, up from $2,700. Since each primary and the general election count as separate elections, individuals may give $5,600 per candidate per cycle. "

 

Was this suppose to be for another topic? Or did you think this was about campaign contributions?

 

nope, it's for this one, I do not support the rich putting so much money into politics, it should be a crime, what did you think we were talking about?

 

So, when Parlor, Gab and Trump's own social media app ban people, shoudl we go after them too?

Bear in mind, there are now choices besides twitter, FB, Instagram, and others. You have Parlor, Gab, GETTR, Telegram, and others and yes, they are making the same mistakes as they claim FB, Twitter, YT, and others claim they do.