Bigotry nonsense

"Gay conversion therapy" has long since been debunked.

http://www.livescience.com/25082-gay-conversion-therapy-facts.html

http://www.hrc.org/resources/the-lies-and-dangers-of-reparative-therapy

https://76crimes.com/ex-gay-therapy-what-reputable-experts-have-to-say/

 

You are intolerant of them as a group. You can't even be honest with yourself.

Same as any other group.

Post how your life has changed? What have you been forced to accept. Based on the bigotry of the OP, I'd say you are free to be unacceptable. You aren't in jail, you are forced to participate. So just another who has to make stuff up. You don't have to cater to 1 single thing. You know liars go to hell?
Lying is a sin. So is lying worse than gay in your world?

 

Therapy? Have you ever been out of the house?

 

Some of the homosexuals and their supporters here are under the belief that gay couples can procreate.

 

Consensual sex with and animal or a child??!! WTF . !! And you expect to be taken seriously. You're just trolling with that srt of nonsense

Of course I have. However bigots never recognize their bigotry and if they do will not admit to it.

Screwing children is a crime and harms them bubba!

Good for you, sparky!

 

No you didn't. We aren't talking about openly gay people because they aren't the only men who have sex with men. That isn't a fact you revealed that is an assumption. A rather dumb one.

Until you can prove that it's only openly gay people that contract 67% of the cases of aids it isn't a fact.

Which facts? The one you mentioned that I pointed out was an assumption?

I deny your assumption but that isn't a fact.

Further 67% of 100% of infected people is the statistic were talking about. 100% of people infected don't even equate to a quarter of a percent of the population.

Most gay men are not infected with these illnesses.

Your fear mongering is a little dishonest.

You are crying because people know facts.

 

We are done here. I'm not wasting my time on this crap

 

Actually, the .34% are those who became HIV positive in a given year. Each one of them had a HIV positive partner who also engaged in unprotected sex with them, leading to their infection. They also engaged in unprotected sex in a given year. And then there are the millions of unprotected sexual encounters that didn't lead to any transmission of HIV.

 

Here is My statement. You even quoted it.

Notice the absence of the term "gay". Your obsession regarding sexual orientation leads you astray frequently.

 

Its wrong. 2% represents the amount of people that are openly gay. I don't think missy men that do have sex with men talk about it if they aren't openly gay.

Now if you can prove that only 2% of men have sex with men than that statement would be a fact. But you can't so it's not.

I deny your claim, it's your burden to prove it. If you don't it isn't a fact and not buying a lazy misinterpretation of statistics isn't the same as denying a fact.

Establish your claims as fact first than you can claim that I'm denying facts.

So 2% of men have sex with men and they're not necessarily gay?

Again establish that as a fact and then we can move on.

You claiming something doesn't equal fact. You hold much animosity towards gay people. You need to present verifiable science that proves this claim to establish it as a fact.

 

There is no reliable therapy to change people's sexual orientation.

Minors can't give informed consent to sex with adults. That's something progressive women fought for decades to achieve.

Animals can't give informed consent to anything because they are not considered to be sentient. That said in many places bestiality is technically not illegal but you might find yourself up on charges of animal endangerment.

In order for a contract to be entered into, both parties need to be sentient and capable of informed consent.

As for the restrictions on polygamy, I outlined that earlier in the thread. We'd need a completely new code in family law to make it happen. I've tried to discuss that in threads devoted specifically to polygamy but people don't really want to talk about about that, they just use polygamy to bash gays.

They further ignore the fact that in the countries around the world that do allow polygamy, (AKA male "ownership" of wives but never the other way around) same-sex marriage is never legal. Which leads me to ask, if one thing leads to the other, why hasn't it happened there?

You could make a legal argument for polygamy based on the fact that opposite sex couples are allowed to marry and you could make the exact same argument even if gay people simply didn't exist.

 

It's not an action.



​

 

Gay couples can 'procreate' as well as many heterosexual couples that marry.

 

Why is it that Conservatives- and homophobes in particular have such a hard time understanding consent.

Why is it you cannot distinguish between two adults consenting to have sex together- and a 40 year old man having 'consensual' sex with a 3 year old girl?

 

They can, they are just playing dumb.

 

I question their capacity for being around small children sometimes.
Maybe they are trying to convince themselves their sexual fantasies can be corrected before they offend?

 

They're right! Two women can procreate twice as fast as one hetero couple.

The issues of marriage just need to be separated from decisions on procreation. They are separate and there isn't any justification for getting confused about marriage by trying to stir in issues of procreation.

 

This says otherwise.

http://m.christianpost.com/news/ex-...to-sbcs-reparative-therapy-stance-128971/?m=1

 

To those blind to the experts and medical reality, I'm sure it does, and you clearly desperately need it to, but GCT is simply a laughable fraud, and has been proven so many times.

 

Prove it.

Which is why I'm not a bigot for addressing the actions of this group. Now before you ask, the reason I'm not focusing on other groups is because I can't focus on every group. There's a reason why for a while I stuck with gun control and evolution on this forum.

I haven't changed but only due to being immune to PC.

 

And notice you didnt address polygamist. And as for the other two children and animals have consented to a lot of other things. For animals (pet) they (for the most part) consented to being pets. Cats are another story.

No, you haven't. Prove it.

Being gay was also a crime and it harms them.

Thank you.

- - - Updated - - -

Cya then.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes it is.

 

Prove it, prove it, prove it. Are becoming a parrot?
I have, in the 1st few pages. You even admitted it. You have even said you want to speak out against being gay. That is intolerance. If you aren't wise enough, maybe you should continue with an education.

But you are a bigot. When you want to change a group of people because you don't like them, that is the very definition. You are so intolerant towards them, you speak against them.
I have had no problem admitting my bigotry in this thread. And getting educated is a fix towards the group of people I am bigoted against.

But if you want to tackle an issue, start with the issues most problematic to society. Divorced families have a far greater impact on society than 3% of the population.

So, gun control issue is solved? Evolution is now agreed upon by the world? Or did you give up.

 

That doesn't mean you give up or ban it like in Kalifornication.

Minors give consent to a lot of things when you think about it. "Would you like to wear this dress, Sally?" Not to mention schools are giving birth control pills and even abortions to them.

A lot of them gave consent to be pets didnt they? Otherwise they wouldn't be pets.

Then that harkens to my above point about pedophiles. Can't a ten year old read and understand?

But I thought it was about love and consent.

Oh but it has. There's a growing movement of pedophiles seeking the same rights.

Ok?

- - - Updated - - -

Why not a 21 year old marry a 13 year old?

 

Being gay is an action. Now if I said "I'm speaking out against gay people" now that would be a different story.

It's not the group it's their actions.

No I'm still at it on both, but I've decided to expand my horizon. I can only expand it so much though.

 

All existing therapy is harmful. That is why it's being banned.

If you want to come up with some therapy that is ethical and functional. Be my guest.

Bestiality and child molestation isn't equal to homosexuality. Apples to oranges. It's a false cause.