BILL MAHER: Comparing Islam to Christianity regarding violence is liberal bull.....

Torture on the Rack = 16th century!
Muslim Bombs going off = 2013

Got it now?????

 

Who said they did? Looks like straw grasping. The church and religion evolved. Certain Commandments are still sacrosanct, but people aren't too afraid of coveting their neighbor's lawnmower or Lexus.

As long as they return it.

 

A question... Do you follow the old or new testement, or a bit of both?

 

The old testement is also why christians who hate gays, hate gays.

I don't see many "christians" from the US right, acting in accordancewith the words of christ. I hear them bleating obout christ, but never acting in accordance with his words. Most right wing chrsitians here are far more aligned with the old testement.

 

The way the left approaches this issue, it's almost as if they are advocating for an additional 400-600 year "free pass" for Muslims to commit global carnage.

 

Yes, PEOPLE did in the name of their god. Like the christinas oppose gay marriage, in the name of their god.

It's all incrediby stu[pid!

 

Read my other responses, I'm not repeating myself.

 

Right on the nail!

 

It's sick when you really think about it. The left is fine with potentially millions more being killed in Islam's continuing "growing pains stage". They believe that because Christianity had a head start of about 600 years, we should give Islam the same amount of time before becoming as critical of it as they are with Christianity.

 

Like I said, the religion didn't change, its the people, that includes the congregation. Coveting is still a commandment sin, it is the people and the congregation that do not put much emphasis on that commandment.

Your post doesn't show religion changing.

 

I did read your other responses. They all pretty much say the same thing. Like your post to which I responded, your other posts are wrong-think. They're all meaningless in today's world.

Objective and un-bigoted Americans of European ancestry don't continue to blame native Americans for slaughters that took place 150-300 years ago. Native Americans aren't burning villages and scalping folks these days. Objective and unbigoted Christians don't still blame Italians because their Roman ancestors fed us to lions in the coliseums. Romans haven't fed Christians to lions for 1600 years or more. Objective and un-bigoted African Americans don't blame ALL whites for the past abuses of the KKK. Most all whites have disavowed the KKK, and we've virtually wiped it out in the US. Objective and unbigoted Christians don't blame Jews for the death of Christ. Christians and Jews get along very well in today's world, much to the disappointment of Jew-hating organizations like the Nation of Islam. Objective and un-bigoted Jews don't blame the Christians of today for the abuses of the Inquisition. Protestant Christians were also subjected to those abuses 100's of years ago. I'm a Protestant, but I don't blame my Catholic friends of today for the past abuses of some of their faith.

AND finally, objective and un-bigoted people don't pretend that Christians are killing Muslims today for any reason other than in retaliation for Islamic atrocities committed against Christians, Jews, and other Muslims in EVERY year for the past 50; Most recently, last week! BS arguments about past evils are worthless, and intended to excuse the evil-doers of today. Get your priorities atraight, will you?

 

Please, go further...

Afganistan and Iraq are retaliation against Islamic atrocities. Oh, fair enough.

Just two things...

1. YOU GOT THE WRONG FREAKING COUNTRY - they were from Saudi - the place you get your oil.

2. Please tell me, where did JESUS, talk about "retaliation", oh objective and un-bigoted one? Where? Quote jesus please!!!!

That's right, you can't and you're going to hell because of your lies and otherwise sinful life.

 

Too many schools are devolving (if they were ever even above this in the first place) into degree mills.

 

This guy is trying to play both sides. He's a die hard liberal underneath so I don't suggest anyone who's not a progressive praise this man on ANYTHING he says. Until he comes out and proclaims he's no longer a progressive liberal, then don't give this man any praise or credit for ANYTHING.

He is still an enemy combatant.

 

It is the liberal Prog's intolerance and bigotry that causes such actions. Their hatred of religion drives extremists to do unthinkable acts. Too bad they continue to push their anti-religion agenda.

 

The US Right - a lunatic fringe. Thanks for illustrating it once again!

 

If you're going to comment on my posts, please make comments that actually relate to what I said.

Afghanistan was the nation state protecting Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaida cohorts. Bin Laden admitted in video that he'd help plan the World Trade Center attack. Those who planned and pushed Atta and the others to crash planes into the towers and kill innocent Americans did so from Afghanistan! American retaliation is taking quite a long time. The Islamic murders were killed, captured, and frightend into rat holes where they belong. So, YES, our war in Afghanistan WAS retaliation for Muslim atrocities.

Iraq is not so much a matter of Islamic terrorism, for Sadam Hussein was simply a power-hungry, hateful leader who slaughtered his own people when they disagreed with him. He planned the assasination of GHW Bush, but as with most things Sadam did, he blew it. Every advanced nation on earth knew that Sadam had weapons of mass destruction. Those nations were surprised that he disposed of them across borders into Syria prior to our attack. Planning the assasination of a US President is sufficient justification for killing the sob!

I said nothing about Saudi Arabia. The Saudis play both sides of the fence. The Saudi leadership didn't conduct the WTC bombing. Those Saudi murderers who did attack the WTC, also wanted to overthrow the Saudi government. WHY would the US attack Saudi Arabia, and help the Islamic terrorists??? Trying to cloud the issue with your irrelevant statements won't work with me!

Your inability to grasp the issue here is pathetic. I wasn't talking about "religion" per-se. I was talking about how decent, objective, and un-bigoted people judge one another. Jesus didn't speak of "retaliation". Based on your hatred of Christianity, why do you care what Christ did or did not say. I do recall one remark that may be applicable; i.e., "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, and unto God, that which is God's." Islamic terrorists believed their God demands Jewish and Christian blood. They got some of our blood on 9/11/2001. Islamic terrorists paid then and will continue to pay in their own blood for their crimes. If and when they begin acting like decent human beings, we Christians and Jews will welcome them into the community of peace and love. Until such time, we Americans don't take kindly to hateful, murdering bigots! We'll continue to weed them out, hunt them down, and kill them like rats. Now, wanna tell us that defending ourselves is insensitive?

I'm lying and living a sinful life? lol I'm not the one defending murdering slime, kid, you are. You'd better stick to lecturing in some radical mosque. Tell us more about the evils of that religion that urges that we "love thy neighbor as theyself?!

 

Not exactly fringe when the left and right have devolved to the point of complete hatred and contempt for one another. If I'm *fringe* for viewing left ninnies as an enemy combatant then so is 90% of the left.

The only thing illustrated here is your lack of understanding about the attitudes on either side.

 

This professor is living proof to what PHD actually stands for --- Piled Higher and Deeper. So much so it must be pouring out his ears. All that education and not an ounce of sense.

 

so u r saying moslems are generally bad and the inquisition wasnt bad/awful or a fact?

 

That question has been answered multiple times already. However, one has to be ignorant to the topic to even ask it.

 

What you make it sound like Islam was actually peaceful in 16th century or something.

 

Thank you for being such a caricature of a liberal and setting an example for all to see.

 

This is the second time I've given Maher a standing ovation this year.
The first was when he claimed he was paying too much in taxes in California.

Maybe Bill is starting to be the poster boy for the old saying "a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged".

 

Nope! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_16th-century_Muslim_history