Herman Cain has spent his life living and working all over the country -- Indiana, Georgia, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, Washington, D.C. -- but never in Chicago. So it's curious that all the sexual harassment allegations against Cain emanate from Chicago: home of the Daley machine and Obama consigliere David Axelrod. Suspicions had already fallen on Sheila O'Grady, who is close with David Axelrod and went straight from being former Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley's chief of staff to president of the Illinois Restaurant Association (IRA), as being the person who dug up Herman Cain's personnel records from the National Restaurant Association (NRA). The Daley-controlled IRA works hand-in-glove with the NRA. And strangely enough, Cain's short, three-year tenure at the NRA is evidently the only period in his decades-long career during which he's alleged to have been a sexual predator. After O'Grady's name surfaced in connection with the miraculous appearance of Cain's personnel files from the NRA, she issued a Clintonesque denial of any involvement in producing them -- by vigorously denying that she knew Cain when he was at the NRA. (Duh.) And now, after a week of conservative eye-rolling over unspecified, anonymous accusations against Cain, we've suddenly got very specific sexual assault allegations from an all-new accuser out of ... Chicago. Herman Cain has never lived in Chicago. But you know who has? David Axelrod! And guess who lived in Axelrod's very building? Right again: Cain's latest accuser, Sharon Bialek. Bialek's accusations were certainly specific. But they also demonstrated why anonymous accusations are worthless. Within 24 hours of Bialek's press conference, friends and acquaintances of hers stepped forward to say that she's a "gold-digger," that she was constantly in financial trouble -- having filed for personal bankruptcy twice -- and, of course, that she had lived in Axelrod's apartment building at 505 North Lake Shore Drive, where, she admits, she knew the man The New York Times calls Obama's "hired muscle." All this done because Obama knows a plain spoken self made millionaire would beat him in a straight up Presidential election. What Obama has done to destroy a fellow Black man is surely a crime.
So Obama is a race traitor for doing this to a fellow black "man?" Am I to understand that black "people" are supposed to stick together? Them against us? Fair enough. Are White people allowed to behave in this way? I sure hope so... otherwise that'd be just plain unfair.
Don't be silly. Read the OP again. I realize that all that liberals ever see is race but try to read something in the post besides race. I know it'll be difficult. I was sued in Federal court for gender discriminatation. I refused to settle and won the case. I had a complaint of sexual assault filed against me. Fortunately, for me, it included specific dates and times and an investigation found that I had many witnesses to being somewhere else at the time of some of the allegations. A. For those of you who are over 15, what would you do if someone said that ten years ago you sexually harrassed them. It's someone you don't know but they did go to the same school you did when you were in school. How would you defend yourself? If it's he said/she said, then she said wins. B. Even better, assume that the person accussing you is anonymous. An unnamed person says you did this or that. C. I decided to fire an employee who was, among other things, calling in sick and going skiing. There had been numerous warnings and discussions about performance. The supervisor returned to my office and said that we couldn't fire the employee because he'd been sleeping with her and she was threatening to tell his wife. In investigating, I found two other employees who said this woman had told them what she intended to do. The supervisor was stupid but the woman was malicious and criminal. It's pitiful but the liberal smear machine never stops.
