I looked up a climate scientist cited in another thread on climate change, and then stumbled upon this morsel: Her only insight on climate is that it changes four times every year. It makes your head hurt, the dumbing down of political discourse continues. For the love of god, how can people vote for her? Note in edit, I apologize for the misspelling of Boebert's name in the title, maybe the mods can correct it.
Comparing speeches of some climate panic-people her speech is more factual, reasoned, and accurate then those claiming a 1.5C temperature increase over 150 years is going to be the end of the world as we know. Granted, the panickers comprise a very low hurdle in climate scholarship.
There is a plethora of politicos on both sides who expound passionately about climate science but who don't know much more about it than how to spell it.
Well, that may be so, but, maybe, she could have actually talked about climate change, instead of 45 minutes of "Dems bad"? Of course, the problem with this is that she doesn't know anything else other than repeating tired RW talking points ad infinitum.