BREAKING: Bolton to Claim Trump Held Up Ukraine Military Aid Over Biden Investigations

I've already proven that Bolton liked Trump because who in the heck would work for someone they didn't like.

 

Why would Bolton work for such a horrible person like Trump in the first place?

 

You got that part right Trump is a horrible person. He lost more cabinet members and department leaders in 3 years
than any one president lost in 8 years. This is because he is too unstable and horribly lacking in attention span to work with. So why don't you ask this question of the other 20 some officials who left in droves. Trumps record in this regard is a travesty. Remember the pink column over Trumps name only represents only 3years.

 

And the answer is that Trump would tie the process up in appeal after appeal.

 

The answer is because the black- mailer in chief tied up all the docs and witnesses in court to hide his massive abuse of power from the Democrats and the American people. The Democrats were not about to wait until the middle of 2020 to see results.

 

Trump got impeached based on the proof provided. Senate Republicans admitted that the House Managers proved their case.

I was not appealing to any "authority" by quoting the 75% statistic. I am predicting that doing something which 75% of Americans oppose will result in a political backlash.

 

Someone should fire the moron that hired Bolton.

 

Trump got impeached because Pelosi successfully bribed/threatened the Democrats in the house. That is all.

 

So, then why would Bolton work for such a horrible person like Trump in the first place?

 

Like Obama did?

 

Like Obama did. Good to know.

 

Someone should fire Bolton the moron. Oh wait, Trump did fire his ***!

 

Yes....like Obama. What is your point?

 

What is your point?

 

I thought it was obvious. The Democrats did not refer the subpoena matter to the Courts because Trump would tie it all up with appeal after appeal. Do you not recall me posting that?

 

A false equivalency. Obama wasn't being impeached. You don't know the difference do you? mass ignorance. The constitution says Impeachment is up to the House including asking for documents and witnesses. Don't get upset at us just because guilty Trump shredded and defied the American constitution by hiding witnesses and docs

 

Every single report from House Democrats is that there was no whipping of the vote.

You falsely accused me appealing to authority earlier. So unless you got any evidence in support, you are just appealing to bullshit.

 

Bolton quit the week before Trump personally made his demand of Zelensky in that phone call.

 

Nope. Not a false equivalency.

 

What?

The phone call happened on July 25, 2019.

Bolton got fired resigned on September 10, 2019.

 

Lol You're calling operation fast and furious an impeachment. Another fictional post and once again unconnected from reality. More B.S. games.

 

A subpoena is a subpoena.

Documentation is documentation.

An investigation is an investigation.

And taking said subpoenas and documentations to court to fight their delivery in an investigation is no different in either case.

 

And ignorance is ignorance and gutlessness is gutlessness. Do you have the guts to show me where it says that in the constitution regarding impeachment? Show me you're evidence

 

Show me in the the constitution where it says that issuing subpoenas, requesting documentation, performing investigations and using the courts are different for impeachment and compared to none impeachment stuff?????

 

"Gaetz told “Hannity” guest host Gregg Jarrett that both he and Arizona Republican Rep. Andy Biggs — who also joined the show — had heard Democratic leadership threatening to withhold funding from anyone who failed to support impeachment."

https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/31/matt-gaetz-democrats-threatened-impeachment/

"Democratic Rep. Anthony Brindisi voiced his frustrations directly to Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The battleground freshman told Pelosi and other leaders at a closed-door meeting that he and other centrists feared that talk of impeaching President Donald Trump was threatening to swamp the Democratic agenda, according to multiple people in the room.

“It’s very frustrating for me — someone coming from a district that was one of the districts that helped get us into the majority — having so much focus on things like impeachment or other issues that are divisive,” Brindisi said in an interview, adding that he’s been talking to fellow swing-district freshmen who have similar concerns with the fall agenda. “We should be focusing on the kitchen table issues.”"

https://www.gop.gov/why-do-we-think-impeachment-is-the-primary-focus-of-house-dems/

"“It’s very obvious that the speaker has spent a lot of time assuaging those moderates up for re-election that she’s going to be able to provide wins for them,” said Jim Manley, a longtime Democratic strategist."

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/16/how...elp-a-tiny-flatware-manufacturer-win-big.html

"Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s rush to impeachment is receiving an assist from the millions of dollars at least one PAC aligned with her has already spent on House Democrats who currently represent swing districts."

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...pends-millions-help-swing-district-democrats/

"Congressman Anthony Brindisi, D-22, has confirmed that he will be voting to impeach President Donald Trump on Wednesday"

https://www.wktv.com/content/news/Rep-Brindisi-to-vote-in-favor-of-impeachment-566270661.html