BREAKING: DOJ Hiding 400 Pages of Documents Showing Payoffs and Gifts to Jim and Hunter Biden from U

BREAKING: DOJ Hiding 400 Pages of Documents Showing Payoffs and Gifts to Jim and Hunter Biden from Ukraine and Russia


The Justice Department is doing everything in their power to prevent the release of 400 pages of sensitive documents relating to payments and gifts made to Joe Biden’s son Hunter and his brother Jim Biden.

Back in March, Colorado lawyer Kevin Evans sued the DOJ for failing to comply with his request for the information on the Biden’s under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Evans, who is an expert on the Freedom of Information Act, requested for documents relating to “any relationship, communication, gift(s), and/or remuneration in any form” between Hunter Biden or Jim Biden and China, Russia or Ukraine.

At first, the department claimed they had 400 pages of “potentially relevant” documents but are now denying they even exist.

Check out what the Daily Mail reported:…








https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/br...d-russia/?utm_source=appnotify&utm_medium=app







It’s time for the courts to enforce the FOIA in this case. The obstruction and cover up is a major issue. The corruption of the Biden family from the Big guy on down is a clear and present danger to our country.

 

Biden’s greed and corruption is legendary and he’s compromised in relations to other countries that own him and have more dirt on let’s go Brandon.

 

Sounds like something that should be looked into. Let the chips fall where they may.

If true, is there even a scenario in which payments from the DOJ to hunter biden would be legal?

 

A special counsel needs to be appointed to investigate Biden and everyone he's ever known.

 

Quite possible those documents exist and they are not releasing them, that's pretty much the standard practice of the DOJ when there is an ongoing investigation, what they release and what they comment on is very limited until the investigation concludes.

Payment from the DOJ?.. where on earth are you getting that information from?

 

It was payments from the China, Russia, Ukraine the FOIA was looking for...
funny how we hear Russia, Russia, Russia... when it was really China, China, China as the Biden's were eye ball deep in with the Chinese government and Hunter working with 3 different Chinese spies...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...e-Hunter-Jim-Bidens-payoffs-China-Russia.html

"From my unique vantage point as the individual who consumes all of the U.S. government's most sensitive intelligence on the People's Republic of China, I do not believe the majority view expressed by Intelligence Community (IC) analysts fully and accurately reflects the scope of the Chinese government's efforts to influence the 2020 U.S. federal elections," Ratcliffe stated
https://justthenews.com/politics-po...ght-influence-americas-2020-federal-elections

https://www.publishedreporter.com/2...ia-management-pressured-analysts-to-downplay/

https://archive.org/stream/2021-jan...Intel_Com_Election_Security_Analysis_djvu.txt

 

To be honest this doesn’t surprise me at all. It doesn’t change the fact I pick sides with Ukraine over Russia. Politics is ugly in any country.

 

That is the bottom line here. Did you hear about the governor of the Virgin Islands firing their AG for suing a major bank for its Epstein Island connections while Biden was vacationing there? Must be why he left DC during a major weather event.

 

Exactly! The administration is rotten and corrupt to its very core from Biden on down.

 

Not sure why anyone would choose to support Russia over Ukraine. Ukraine whatever its faults was the victim of naked aggression and are admirable in defending their nation. I could understand strict neutrality but not Russian apologetics. Just because China is our main enemy that we truly need to concentrate our efforts against doesn’t mean we need to embrace Russia on this particular matter.

 

I stopped reading here:

 

Literally in the article posted. Unless I'm misinterpreting something. It explicitly states that the documents detail payments to bidens sons. Unless it's not referring to the payments coming from the DOJ. But that's the way I read it.

 

Yes, it mentions possible payment to Jim and Hunter Biden, but absolutely nowhere does it suggest payment coming from the DOJ. I have no idea what you are talking about when you say it's there in the article, because absolutely nowhere in the article is it suggested that there was payment from the DOJ. The title of the article clearly says "from Ukraine and Russia" but nowhere does the article say anything about payment from the DOJ. Perhaps you can elaborate why you would interpret it that way?

 

The Justice Department is doing everything in their power to prevent the release of 400 pages of sensitive documents relating to payments and gifts made to Joe Biden’s son Hunter and his brother Jim Biden

I was just going off that statement. It's not until later that it mentions payments/gifts/etc from ukraine and russia.

After rereading, it probably is referring to only those payments.

Like it matters though, they're corrupt to the core, we all know it, absolutely nothing will be done about it.

 

It's not until later that it mentions that? that's not true at all.. again it's in the title of the article. The literal beginning of the article makes the specification

 

So another maybe, perhaps, I think it is there, etc. But the reality is that the DOJ is considering criminal charges on Hunter Biden. The request is also very broad in scope and it is difficult for the DOJ to honor that request timely. However, just because there is a FOIA request does not mean it can or will be granted. If these documents are with an ongoing investigation, then that request will be denied until such investigation is concluded, one way or the other. And since Mr. Evans is a criminal defense attorney for white collar crimes, according to his practice area of expertise, I seriously doubt the request will be granted until such an investigation is concluded.

 

the conservative mindset, nothing like guilty until proven innocent. Mike Evans made the claim thinking that there are potentially payments from Ukraine, Russia, and/or China in the documents he is requesting. And yet, he has no proof, not even his petition shows that he has proof despite what the DOJ said originally.

 

'guilty until proven innocent' is the perfect description of how the left reacts to everything.

Your kind will believe anything negative (especially about a certain someone) and run with it.

Shall we list the bullshit the left has said about trump that turned into nothing?

How you could even say that without realizing the hypocrisy of the statement is laughable.

 

That saying is the biggest sham ever uttered Ranks right up there with "You are not under arrest; you're just being detained" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

That is what is embedded in the 5th amendment mudman. It is a cornerstone of our judicial system from everything from a simple traffic ticket to homicide to any other crime. The prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law that a person is guilty of that crime whether a jury decides the facts or the judge does if the defendant waives a jury trial.

Again, if you read the article, it is all maybe, perhaps, and I think so on the allegations. It may be true or it may not be true. I don't know. But one thing I do know is that the DOJ is considering criminal charges on Hunter Biden. And to me, any information that may pertain to a possible criminal charge cannot and will not be allowed under the FOIA because that will go against the prosecution in proving their case.

 

You do realize mudman doubled down on that statement and even said that it should be so, in not so many words. But then again, you and others already think Joe Biden and Hunter Biden are gulity even though you do not have one shred of evidence.

 

LMAO

 

Hmm.. I take it then you haven't spent any time actually reading the email output from the hunter laptop which essentially identifies all of these payments. The work product from DOJ would indicate whether the DOJ actually did anything with that information or not. And likely, it is the later, to which they won't want to admit to.

 

I'd say the bank transfers from the former mayor of Moscow's wife to hunter, the payments from Burisma, the payments from the several chinese banks and investment firms that are already public domain call for folks, like you, to try to discredit that evidence. Since the evidence is there to review. Are you suggesting that when you, for example, knew in your heart that orange man bad was guilty, that you had actual evidence? That's a stretch...

 

I really like the pictures myself, like the lowest cost porno's ever produced

Lil huntard, makin daddy proud ¯\_(ツ)_/¯