BREAKING Lorreta Lynch under investigation!

that is a lie.

it is not illegal to store or send classified emails on personal email

 

It's not a lie and you are spouting complete and utter nonsense. Those are the actual laws she broke when she stored and passed classified emails on her private server.

EDIT: Wait, are you drunk? Why would anyone make such a complete nonsensical statement?? lol Not illegal to pass classified emails on a private server??? lol

 

if she broke the law, she would have been indicted

she broke no law, as the law also requires malicious intent

 

She did break the law.

Nope. Protected by Loretta Lynch from the DOJ who was never going to prosecute her.

 

the law requires malicious intent.

none can be proved, so no indictment

 

Not true and she still broke the law. You can admit it. Everyone knows it.

 

100% true, the law requires malicious intent to indict.

go read the law

 

LOL

 

please I beg you find the word intent with in the law

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Comey added the requirement of intent even thou no where is it mentioned he even admitted he did so

 

That is the most absurd statement I've heard in defense of HRC. We have a winner!

 

And so are you lapping up the propaganda. Nothing has been proven yet; least of all the how it was written and sent. It's funny how supporters of Trump will lick the boots of the main stream press like NYT and the Washington Post when the reporting goes in a direction they like...Are you now going to rethink what the main stream press has proven about Trump and his campaign staff using Russian Hacked DNC and Hillary campaign documents agaisnt her? Just as I thought cherry picking stories from the main stream press. 100% hypocrisy. Your are now believing the "lying main stream press" now that it suits you.
This story is not new it's only recently that Trump supporters have caught on and are foaming at the mouth over this:

NYT 4-22-17
"During Russia’s hacking campaign against the United States, intelligence agencies could peer, at times, into Russian networks and see what had been taken. Early last year, F.B.I. agents received a batch of hacked documents, and one caught their attention.


The document, which has been described as both a memo and an email, was written by a Democratic operative who expressed confidence that Ms. Lynch would keep the Clinton investigation from going too far, according to several former officials familiar with the document.


Former Justice Department officials are deeply skeptical of this account. If Mr. Comey believed that Ms. Lynch were compromised, they say, why did he not seek her recusal? Mr. Comey never raised this issue with Ms. Lynch or the deputy attorney general, Sally Q. Yates, former officials said".

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/us/politics/james-comey-election.html

There is nothing here that proves Lynch had anything to do with it. I would imagine you will now look to the right wing propaganda sights to fill in the ugly fictional details because surely the main stream press hasn't given you enough raw meat..

 

I wonder what else we'll learn from this "Russia investigation"

 

If Hillary truly broke the law with her emails, Trump would indict her.

so where's the indictment?

 

"lock her up" was a campaign thing...

 

That's nonsense and it would not come from Trump at all.

Man, you never get anything right. You are not a "fact checker" by trade are you?

 

if she REALLY broke the law, they would indict her

 

How do you know they won't. They were counting on winning and covering up their misdeeds... oops....

 

The law requires intent. Malicious isn't a stipulation. HRC was counseled against, and therefore kept concealed her private server. Intent.

 

the law requires intent and extreme carelessness.

let me know when Sessions indicts her.

 

Wrong again.

 

If Comey is forced to submit his findings to Sessions, Hills is going to jail. No congressional hearings involved. Federal court ... federal prison.

 

let us know when they indict

 

Count on it.

 

LOL!!!!

i wont hold my breath

Trump donated to Hillary's campaign in 2000 and 2004.

he likes her

 

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

the law requires gross negligence there isn't any requirement of intent and if sending classified information to a pervert that was caught sexting an underage girl with no security clearance isn't gross negligence I don't know what is