BREAKING: Robert Mueller is speaking right now, for the first time since the report was released

Discussion in 'United States' started by MrTLegal, May 29, 2019.

  1. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The facts for a change.
     
  2. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,183
    Likes Received:
    9,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, you keep watching those Fox News layers, because as we all know they have no agenda.

    And you understand that the DOJ are the ones who bring charges, not the FBI. The DOJ said that
     
  3. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Translation: You will put blinders on and ignore the law.
     
  4. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,183
    Likes Received:
    9,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    WTF are you talking about. Nobody put on “blinders”. You wanted charges brought, so you will ignore what the actual lawyers say to push an agenda. I am the one quoting the DOJ, your the one claiming, thru your agenda, that they somehow have an agenda. The irony there is just stunning
     
    AZ. and Nemesis like this.
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obama's DOJ? LOL, you still can't show intent in the laws she broke but instead repeat like a broken record. Gosh, I didn't INTEND to break the law. Try than in court sometime.
     
  6. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,970
    Likes Received:
    9,368
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, God.
     
  7. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,183
    Likes Received:
    9,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dear lord. Just keep being obtuse to the law and by all means let Sean Hannity explain the law to you ;)
     
    AZ. likes this.
  8. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sean was certainly right on the Russia collusion hoax.
     
  9. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,183
    Likes Received:
    9,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So then by that standard, no charges were brought against Trump for obstruction because its his DOJ then right ?
     
  10. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,183
    Likes Received:
    9,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sean hasn’t been right his entire career. If ANYONE is still listening to him and claiming him correct on anything after his interview with Dan Rather where he actually said he was a political pundit who should not be listened to when facts were involved, then thats on you.
     
  11. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wait, you haven't heard the Russia collusion fairy tale was a big nothing-burger? You're really asking if anyone listens to him? In May he was #1 in cable news ratings: https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjo...month-since-trumps-inauguration/#351b6ffb6301
     
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2019
  12. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry, I don't get my law off of TV like you do.
     
  13. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean no evidence. Guess you still don't know how law works.
     
  14. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,183
    Likes Received:
    9,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yep, and AFTER he literally told you from his own mouth that he was full of $%1# and you're still not only listening to him, you still be believe him. You cant make that crap up with a team of writers
     
    AZ. likes this.
  15. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,183
    Likes Received:
    9,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your hipocrisy knows no bounds

    But hey, at least you admit it
     
    AZ. likes this.
  16. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you still think people should be crucified even if there is no evidence. Fascinating.
     
  17. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,183
    Likes Received:
    9,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I never said that. But I did point out that you think that for Hillary, yet not for Trump.

    Thus "Your Hipocrisy knows no bounds"
     
  18. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Comey outlined her crimes, did not refer her to the DOJ as some of the lawyers in the FBI wanted, then made a false legal claim of 'intent' which isn't in the law or his call.
     
  19. Foxfyre

    Foxfyre Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That in fact is the difference between Hillary's emails and President Trump.

    When it became obvious that Hillary's emails existed and were produced illegally on a private server, there was an investigation into THAT, i.e. a crime that obviously had been committed. There was no question that there was a crime. The investigation was to determine who in fact had committed it especially Hillary since it was her people who had set it up and it was she who was using it. The evidence against her was irrefutable including classified materials being transmitted to and from that server making it a felony offense. Further she clearly obstructed justice by deleting at least 30k emails before the investigators could see them, and destroying equipment and bleach bitting hard drives to ensure they could not be recovered. And then the left shrugged it off as unimportant and Obama's Justice Department refused to prosecute.

    There was evidence that Russia had attempted to interfere in our 2016 election and, without any evidence that he had done so, the investigation was to investigate that and determine whether President Trump was implicated in every way. It was determined early on that no Americans, including President Trump and his campaign, were involved in that scam in any way, but that investigation continued for more than a year more desperately looking for something, ANYTHING, even remotely resembling a crime that they could pin on the President. And when Mueller finally acknowledged that he had failed to do so, that has not deterred the radical left or the MSM or the Democrats in Congress from continuing the witch hunt.
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2019
    Hoosier8 and Thought Criminal like this.
  20. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,183
    Likes Received:
    9,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What are you talking about Hoosier. HE DID. I literally posted the quote as to why they didn't charge her, and that quote came from the Legal Counsel !

    The right is full of part time Perry Masons now.
     

Share This Page