Who determined that? You? We're either creating Political and Economic Hegemony for the Corporations that Bribe our Politicians or we're being taken over by the Chinese? Clearly you have nothing to back this up other than opinion and emotions. Why should we? Just defuse the entire situation by eliminating the benefits of being an illegal which comes from Free Medical/Education while also eliminating the Income Tax. Big Government or go home approach eh? Hahaha Either we're spending trillions or we're going back in time to the 19th Century!!! OMG clearly another argument similar to your first one that doesn't stand at all. Because clearly the FIAT money system has worked oh so well the best 80yrs... right? Hahaha for who is the right question. So you believe in the Printing Press creating infinity dollars to supply the USA until the end of time... Right... You keep pulling the 19th Century line and I still see no evidence of that claim. Do you mind not being so god (*)(*)(*)(*) vague and fearful of losing your precious Centralized Government? Than it's a sad day considering he is the only difference on the Stage... I'm pretty sure you and MnBillyBoy would have a similar dream ticket of Obama/Romney if only Obama changes his (D) to an (R). The other Politicians offer nothing in difference other than name and Political Party.
Did you even read my post I answered those questions and I gave answers your not even allowing intelligent debate because I refute your points yet you state them again.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZmLD6UxmD8"]Kamikaze Republican Fish In A Barrel! - YouTube[/ame] )=
In Canada in the early 90's, in the middle of a mounting debt crisis, the federal government slashed 10% off the federal budget, immediately eliminating 80,000 government jobs. For the next 20 years the job growth in Canada increased at a greater rate than the average of all other G8 nations. The country (and the provinces, with few exceptions) began to run surpluses, pay down debt and it's generally considered that the country was well poised for the economic struggles of 2007 and onward thanks to the measures taken two decades ago.
This might be the strangest thing you've said to date. Paul is likely the only candidate who has any track record whatsoever of correctly predicting economic trends and he has held most of his policy positions firmly since he came in to office over 30 years ago. If "after the fact" is announcing his stance on bail-outs, the federal reserve and militarism in the 1970s, then yah I guess his policy stances are very "after the fact", reactionary and pandering.
Predicting economic trends.. Hell.. the sun will rise in the morning and set in the evening. Clouds sometimes during the week followed by some sun.. If he was that ( F ) ricken great why didn't he stop The Dodd/Frank Crapola..Fannie and Freddie..you know..stuff he had control of .. sorta. Did he pick the winning horse at the Kentucky Derby ? Run a multi billion dollar Company like Romney did ? I predict Paul wont get 10 % ( again ) He wont endorse the Republican nominee.. ( Again.. ) The stock market will go down ( again..) And go up ..( again ) I must be brilliant..for 50 YEARS I have been predicting all those things. I bought Gold and Exxon 25 years ago. What did Paul buy ? Texas shrimp ??
