Didn't you say "I don't like generalisations"? Besides, the above highlighted statement IS incredibly, stupidly wrong. It is not a fact that the police are corrupt and they are certainly not "incredibly corrupt". Where do you get these idiotic ideas? Yes you did, you said "most". And again you have made a statement that is ignorant, uninformed and just plane stupid. The number of corrupt cops is not 'many', it would be very few, a tiny percentage, a far smaller percentage than the general population I would wager.
Yes indeed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor....80.93_controversy_and_corruption_allegations http://www.smh.com.au/news/National...ice-are-corrupt/2007/01/11/1168105079090.html http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...l-williams-death/story-e6frg6nf-1225855969941 http://www.smuggled.com/vrb2.htm [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UL7VDxdjDE"]Victorian Police System is Corrupt - YouTube[/ame] I disagree. The word most was intended as a description of the ethnicity of the police force, not the extent of corruption. Many is subjective - it is not however the same as most, which I did not intend to be saying in my comment. I would agree, but relative to police generally its quite high, hence I say many.
Do you realise that under the law of defamation, when you say that about cops it is defamatory, and ANY police officer could sue you for defamation ??? AND I KNOW what Im talking about....no...you look it up....
LOL Frankly I think they have better things to do than chase a 19 year old on the internet. hahaha, maybe back in your day gramps they cared, but not now.