Discussion in '9/11' started by cjnewson88, Aug 7, 2013.
I just said that
I think Hannibal screw up the quote function. My DD214 exists but it contains information that is useful to identity thieves and there are so many criminals involved with 9/11 twoof that I will not run that risk.
Your rebar on the ground does not exist, nor does any evidence of an explosion inside the Pentagon.
Your plane does not exist, and has been proven in real crashes and by the material physical evidence, and you have shown nothing to contradict it
the clasifications you listed prove you are operating outside your paygrade.
Stop warbling, take your fingers out of your ears and show me the rebar.
we are talking about a plane hitting the pentagon right now not rebar
Clarifying: Jojo can't show you the rebar he claimed because it doesn't exist. He made the claim, he can't back it up.
You made a wild and silly claim that something other than a 757 hit the building and people who have experience in these things told you that you have no evidence, but you seemed to think when you mentioned it that the presence of rebar on the ground support your hogwash.
Let's see the rebar.
While we are at it, let's see some theory on how anything else could possibly have done the damage you noted.
No, bombs inside the building and any known missile are not options.
prove it doesnt exist
wrong I made no such claim you wish I did.
people who have experience? Like a fire extinguisher maintenance specialist? BBWWAHAHAHA
You have not shown anyone a plane. got any pics of a plane?
Rummy said it was a missile and he is an official, not to be interpreted that I claim that.
I claim you have shown no bonafide material forensic evidence in-fact of a plane in the events immediately prior to the explosion, so if you got em put up here.
“Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.”
So rather than understand a transcription erro "as" to "and", which make complete sense in the context of what he said, you believe he said "and"...how does that make sense following "...and using an American Airlines flight filled without citizens"???
No, silly. Like a member of the crash crew. Don't take off too many toes shooting yourself in the foot. People can look this stuff up.
It's in the first frame of your gif of the impact, right there where anybody with a room-temp IQ can see it. I even showed you where to look.
There is also the video from the Double Tree showing an object the size and shape of a 757 vertical stabilizer headed for the building just before the fireball.
Rummy is nuts.
We have. You just refuse to believe it, because it conflicts with your halucinations.
You claim evidence of an explosive device and have never shown any evidence. In this thread alone, you claimed to see rebar on the ground, but, when informed that it wasn't there, you ignored any attempt to find out what you are nattering about. Show us some forensic evidence for your delusional beliefs or admit that they are delusions. Show us the rebar.
If it existed, you could show it to us. You have refused to do so, so you are obviously lying or to dim to tell the difference between rebar and a tree branch.
So what? Not having a completely identifiable plane in any of the videos is not proof there was no plane...it's only proof the cameras were unable to capture the event.
Now, please explain the eyewitness statements, the plane and body parts found in and around the Pentagon. If you claim they were "bought" then you are claiming something extraordinary...then you need extraordinary proof to support that claim. There is none so, you don't have it.
thousands of people not one person snapped even one pic, just amazing!
or I could obviously be LMAO while watching you squirm and try to duck the plane issue
yeh rummy throws a wrench into the works that you all cant deal with.
no it isnt, no plane what so ever, just your VERY fertile imagination.
your failure to recognize it is not my problem.
again you people have no clue what bonafide evidence is.
you have proven that time and time again.
show me the plane.
Just amazing???...maybe for someone with such a small brain, like yours.
Why would they? Were they standing around watching another building burn because a plane had crashed into that one shortly before? Most people were not aware of the plane until it crashed. Would you take a picture of a plane just because its flying low?
Have any more moot points or comments you'd like to make?
A crack lawyer like yourself koko should be familiar with the term preponderance of the evidence, something truthers completely lack. Actually, truthers lack any evidence, so the preponderance is VERY heavily weighted towards reality.
over a controlled airspace damn twitty I would.
no pic of a plane no forensic evidence of a plane and magic light poles, yeh you got a sound case there! LMAO
As long as you keep feeding him, he'll keep spewing nonsense.
and also familiar with procedure, qualified evidence, and reasonable doubt applies in crime scenes, and there is so much evidence its even beyond unreasonable doubt.
- - - Updated - - -
you had your turn stop trying to gag everyone else.
yeh you attack then everyone is supposed to roll over and play dead or they are a troll, maxo lamo
"no pic of a plane no forensic evidence of a plane and magic light poles, yeh you got a sound case there! LMAO "
No forensic evidence of a plane??? So, you are just dismissing the plane parts found? How is that honest, on your part?
Separate names with a comma.