Well if you didn't claim that, then please tell me who offers bridge insurance, and how could I have ever gotten it from them? I never even heard of it, so tell me who and where they sell it.
I thought we had already established this, like two or three times? Coverage for health insurance for people who were unable to buy insurance due to pre-existing conditions was through a bridge program, the pre-existing conditions insurance program. This program was to provide coverage until Obamacare became effective this year, 2014, to require insurance companies to enroll people with pre-existing conditions. However based on your previous posts, you are likely to be just as confused by this post as you were by all the other ones I've made.
Hi mike To cover the costs This is where i see opportunity for the Democrat Party and Greens to organize Reforms of prisons, public housing, and public health programs. Mike with the long history of crimes and abuses in both prisons and mental health, Legal abuse and elderly abuse, a system of Restitution and credits back to taxpayers The budgets csn be balanced and invest Resources into development of jobs and Education providing services including Expanding facilities and access. I passed this idea past a labor and currency activist With the greeens and he is all for it. The environment is ripe to push this plan Since the mandates are unconstitutional and need to be replaced with better plans That all parties will agree are more cost effectibe socially responsible and sustainable. I think we can di this also encourage bipartisan collaboration as part of prison and immigration reform that is tied together with this comprehensive plan. Thanks mike i will look up a link for you to a website consulting ppl on aca so you can get help how to researxh your options I see this aca is heading for voluntary participation and reform per party. But it will get better by separating programs not putting all peiple under policies tht dont work for them. People need free choice. We need to quit wasting tax resources on corruption and abuse, refund those credits back to taxpayers per state, and reward states and citizens for directing funds to pay for health education and housing efficiently
emilynghiem, you said "I see this aca is heading for voluntary participation and reform per party. But it will get better by separating programs not putting all peiple under policies tht dont work for them. People need free choice. We need to quit wasting tax resources on corruption and abuse, refund those credits back to taxpayers per state, and reward states and citizens for directing funds to pay for health education and housing efficiently" The ACA is already a voluntary entity, and no one HAS to enroll. If you want to stay with your current insurer, you can. If the current plan from them is as good as, or better, than what the ACA has listed as minimums, then you just keep what you have and go on living. If your current plan is somehow lacking in the minimums defined by the ACA, then that company has to offer an alternative that does meet these requirements. Your statement that people need free choice is true, but that doesn't mean that some policies can exist to cover less than what the ACA says are now minimum coverages. Let's look at an example: Say a football kicker only wants to carry coverage for injuries to his legs or feet. This is NOT possible, for the obvious reason that should he get sick in any other way, he might expect the E.R.to treat him for what would just be a regular visit to a family doctor, if his insurance covered it. So, with everyone having some minimum level of coverage, no doctor, clinic, hospital, or even E.R. has to take the time before treatment to hassle-out payment arrangements, or any other specifics not directly related to the individual's medical care. What more can anyone want? You get sick and go to where ever you feel you need to go. All you do is present your insurance card, and presto, the healing begins.