We all know the Democrats told us that if Al Gore had won the election that the attacks of 9/11/2001 would never have happened. We all know that the Democrats told us that Al Qaeda was on the CIA payroll: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080101115107AASVGWK It has been claimed that the CIA had ties with Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda and its Afghan Arab fighters when it armed Jihadist groups against the Soviet Union during the Soviet war in Afghanistan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_–_al-Qaeda_controversy And we all remember physicist Rosie O'Donnell informing us that fire can't melt steel, so something smells fishy. {Actually this topic belongs in the funny bone section due to that one.} The Colonists were terrorists. The French freedom fighters during WWII were terrorists, as were the OSS that we sent to help them. The contras in Nicaragua were terrorists. The Afghans that we supported against the Soviets were terrorists (still are, have you noticed?). (solar, I have a PHD in political science.) {It does not make to the wiki because of one liberal university professor.} We all know that the Democratic Party and future Obama supporters created the Mujahideen that Democrats claimed was on the CIA payroll: How Jimmy Carter and I Started the Mujahideen Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct? Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention. http://www.counterpunch.org/brzezinski.html We all know that 9/11/2001 was not an enemy to Democrats because it was a technique or tactic: Rape is not an enemy but a technique of warfare -- political intimidation through the selective breeding of unarmed non-combatants. (Zbigview Brznutski, Obama supporter) (Terrorized by 'War on Rape' - Washingtonpurplethrobbingpost) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/23/AR2007032301613.html Our enemy is not terrorism because terrorism is but a tactic. (Remarks by Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism John Brennan at CSIS) http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press...ecurity-and-counterterrorism-john-brennan-csi We all know that the only person Hillary Clinton ever stood in a rope line to see backed the Taliban: The year of 1996 was crucial for Benazir Bhutto's policy on Afghanistan when Pakistan-backed extremely religious group, the Taliban, took power in Kabul in September 1996.[99] It was during Benazir Bhutto's rule that the Taliban gained prominence in Afghanistan and many of her government, including herself, had backed the Taliban for gaining the control of Afghanistan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benazir_Bhutto#Policy_on_Taliban We all remember the Democratic Party appointed CIA Directors Slam Dunk with regard to WMD: At a meeting on December 12, 2002, he assured Bush that the evidence that Iraq had WMDs amounted to a "slam dunk case." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Tenet We all know that Obama won his first term because McCain could not answer in three debates why the invasion of Iraq without WMD, but we know McCain was horribly tortured and as a potential Manchurian Candidate might not have been able to say the authorization was not limited to WMD: I would have preferred that the President agree to the approach drafted by Senators Biden and Lugar because that resolution would authorize the use of force for the explicit purpose of disarming Iraq and countering the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. (TEXT FROM THE SPEECH JOHN KERRY MADE ON THE SENATE FLOOR October 9, 2002) We all know that according to the White House the CIA changed talking points, and took out intelligence to benefit the election of Democrats to a second term by depriving Republicans in Congress of the facts: State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland raised specific objections to this paragraph drafted by the CIA in its earlier versions of the talking points: The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa'ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya. These noted that, since April, there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants, including the June attack against the British Ambassador's convoy. We cannot rule out the individuals has previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks. In an email to officials at the White House and the intelligence agencies, State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland took issue with including that information because it could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that either? Concerned The paragraph was entirely deleted. http://www.whas11.com/news/politics...-points-underwent-12-revisions-206897011.html Was the CIA director compromised? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus#CIA_Director Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive! (Sir Walter Scott) Like how many revisions were there of the CIA talking points, why did the administration lie about the changes, and why cant We the People whose votes are affected by lies see the administration Emails with regard to the deceptive CIA product creation? So should there be hearings to determine if the CIA is a political arm of the Democratic Party?
This is the first time the information posted is in one place. So perhaps there is truth in that the CIA is a terrorist arm of the Democratic Party along with the KKK.
