I didn't know you think consent of the governed was a natural right. I agree that there is a reason for Right to Free speech, freedom of religion, and most of those, and I think they should stay in there for that reason. I too think that Obama has too much power, I just don't think that the solution is to hand the same amount of power to someone else. I think the president has too much power and that is one of the points that I want to change about the constitution. I'm not planning on denying anyone any natural rights. There are other issues here where I'm sure we disagree, such as the nature and existence of natural rights and the status of the right to bear arms and so on, but those are subjects for other threads. I do not support, advocate or even suggest the removal of freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and other, because there are indeed good reason for them to be there.
I am only advocating that we be moral enough to be Angels on Earth so that we may have no need for the expense of government.
Exactly, republicans are class war criminals, now that the people have caught on to them they cry foul like a bunch of whiny babies. Luckily the people are catching on to all the lies and propaganda of the right.
You talk like an idiot." I'm not planning on denying anyone any natural rights." Why ? Do you think you could.Like one morning after a good hearty breakfast you can,all my yer lonesome decide to deny someone a right.Who is suggesting " handing the same amount of power to someone else." What have you been drinking.? You sound stewed.
LIEberrhoidals are irrational. That explains their deranged behaviour and bizarre political conclusions. Their problem is more medical than political.
Slave labor rising up, FINALLY. (Now, can't you just picture the Mittster laughing with one of those fake laughs? Telling us all he's "just like a regular guy"?) PinkSlip Romney in 2012! Support super rich republicans, and working for free!
What objection can there be to taxing the wealthy at wartime rates, whenever we have any wars on Earth, simply to ensure they do not become boondoggles and generational forms of theft?
Well, I assumed that you wrote "You cannot have a civil soiciety by denying natural rights." in response to what I wrote since you quoted me. You brought up the removal of rights, you tell me what you meant.