Clinton Funding Chaos In Charlottesville?

I'm not so much even responding to you anymore, as addressing specific arguments that other leftist enablers will surely make. Once you began spouting about aliens, leprechauns, and lunar landings I lost intrest in debating, and moved toward debunking. Mission accomplished.

 

Libertarian, not leftist. Your "debunking' has consisted of repeatedly lying about my posts even after being corrected. But yes, it is quite obvious you've lost any interest in debating.

 

You've not corrected anyone, or anything. Leftists operate under the impression they can somehow "correct" opinions, or beliefs. Of course as both are a matter of personal choice, the effort is futile. The natural progression is for leftists to try and "impose" their opinion or belief. If that fails scorn and ridicule comes next. Predictable.

 

Lefty-baiting isn't going to do you any good. Once again, Libertarian here. When someone else grossly misrepresents your statements or beliefs, as you have done with me, you have every right to correct them, regardless of your political leanings or theirs. You have accused me of supporting illegal activity which I have not supported. You have continued even after being corrected. I'm not "imposing" my opinion or beliefs on you. I'm asking you to stop misrepresenting my opinions, beliefs and statements.

Once again: I have not advocated any kind of violence on this forum, except for in self defense, and I have not advocated any kind of paid rioting. Please have the decency to be truthful about that.

 

Sure. You haven't openly advocated violence. Though you don't seem overly concerned about party funded PACs turning local issues into national spectacles. I'd just like to know about their screening processes ...

 

Thank you for finally representing my statements accurately. And I don't care about PACs turning local issues into national spectacles, as long as it is done peacefully. I doubt you have personally limited everything you've objected to on this site to local concerns. It is fine to complain or even to protest, so long as you don't actively interfere with the locals carrying out their decisions. Speech isn't true interference. Thinks like violence and vandalism are.

 

There's a big difference between addressing local issues on a forum, and actively participating in a distant municipalities protest. Violence and vandalism is much less likely to be committed by local residents who have to live with the damage, and coexist.

 

Not morally or legally. Peaceful speech in either case is fine. Advocating violence in either case is not.

I prefer taking the individualist approach, not the collectivist one. Someone from out of state who wants to protest should have the same leeway to do so as someone local. If outsiders are more likely to cause damage and violence, we have laws for that.

 

Sorry you have to explain that.

 

It reminds me of the girls gone wild videos.
Pimp would roll up to the party with a bus load of professional skanks which were trained to mingle in the crowd to coerce ordinary people into doing what they normally wouldn't, capture it on camera for gain.