Clinton: I 'short-circuited' on 'truthful' email answer

Your opening thread title is a fabrication. She never said "I short circuited on 'TRUTHFUL' email answer. That's your lie, not Clinton's. So much for accusing others about lying right?

 

Neither one! You forgot the third choice. Which is the email that Comey questioned about that the FBI initially missed, that had a wrong label. That would explain Hillary's statement saying she didn't send any classified emails, and would explain Comey's initial statement.

- - - Updated - - -

Lying about what?

 

Something sent out with a wrong label that even the FBI didn't initially see, is not a "too dumb defense". You can dream on until Hell freezes over and that reality will never change.

- - - Updated - - -

Which is exactly what he or she is doing.

 

Lol! Edited sound bites? Really? You should be ashamed of yourself for lying.

 

How does it make it a lie when the author of the link says "she lied and she knows it"? The question remains, how does he know it? Her statements reflect Comey's. What was she lying about?

 

Actually no! That is what you are inventing as a new argument. Nice try, but that's an old trick here that'll never work.

By the way, what was the proven lie again?

 

Isn't there a song about this "When Your a Crook Your A Crook All the Way!" West Side Story?

“There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about the matters should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.” By Chris Cillizza July 5, The Fix, FBI Director Comey just dropped some shockingly scathing comments about Hillary Clinton’s email setup, Washington Post, 7/5/16.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-comments-about-hillary-clintons-email-setup/

- - - Updated - - -

Stupid is as stupid does - the Gump defense.

 

LOL....pretending you dont know. Here you go, pictures and sound so you dont get tripped on on reading words.

[video]http://reason.com/reasontv/2016/07/05/hillary-clinton-vs-james-comey-email-sca[/video]

 

Yes, as a matter of fact their is. Two phones can easily mean one devise.

Look, we all know the game here. The battle of words taken out of context to mean something else cannot and will not ever be a format for evidence in a court of law to prove your point, or anyone else's. That said, these amateur tactics to try and plant words or meanings that are not theirs is a gigantic effort in futility for the Right. Ever since Whitewater, until today, the Right has gone after Hillary Clinton, and for thirty years they got zilch. Give it a rest people. You've embarrassed yourself enough. Stop being the (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) party.

 

Thanks! You proved my point beautifully again with your edited video. She was being honest about not sending out classified emails, because they were not marked as such. Comey said classified emails were sent out. He too was being honest. The only thing wrong with both of their statements is, they didn't include the labeling. And, at the end of the investigation there was one email in question for the FBI which ended up being missed, that it too had the wrong label.

Bottom line, this is all about wrong labeling. Not lying! And thanks for playing.

 

She lies about everything, we all know that. She also screws up everything she touches. And then she lies more to cover up her constant screw ups. And she doesn't seem to be struggling with remaining upright, apparently her constant lying is affecting her equilibrium.

 

I asked you what she was lying about and you can't answer. Thanks, that confirms who the real fabricator is in this debate.

- - - Updated - - -

About what?

 

About never having classified emails go in and out of her server, for just one thing. Nice try there, though, Sherlock.

 

Trey Gowdy has zero credibility. He got caught trying to frame Hillary with Benghazi. He needs to be put on a shelf someplace collecting dust.

- - - Updated - - -

What was the lie there? Your answer makes no sense. If she said she didn't send out classified emails but they were wrongly labeled, how is that a lie? Answer, it isn't. Try again! And this time, try and make your answer mean something besides (*)(*)(*)(*). And if you can't, move it on down the road.

 

Try your sad little game somewhere else. http://thefederalist.com/2016/07/07...i-director-james-comey-about-hillary-clinton/

 

How does one "mislabel" how many phones they had?

Not truhtful. Thanks for failing,

 

Actually. You are not truthfully representing my answer. I said she lies about EVERYTHING.

Everyone knows this. She is deeply demented corrupt, screw up and liar. Take your monkey shine elsewhere.

 

The content is classified whether its marked classified or not. 1000s of her emails contained classified information. Its a lie or she is totally incompetent at determining what is classified.

 

Oh how about her lying to the American people such as her server was approved by the State Department and met all the rules and regulations. The FBI said it was not only never approved no approval was ever sought and had it been sought it would NOT have been approved because it did not meet all the rules and regulations.

 

And three could easily mean 2 or 4 could mean 6............

 

Are you always this obvious? Now we're talking about phones? Look how easy it was to disconnect you from the emails after I destroyed your own point with, to making you switch the conversation to phones. (*)(*)(*)(*) your easy.

Lack of any counter argument whatsoever noted. You should find yourself another hobby.And thanks again for making my point incredibly easy.

 

Again, "lying about everything" proves nothing, other than the fact that you have built an even stronger argument for me.

It also proves the only one lying here is you.

 

Thats you trying to spin out of getting busted trying to "mislabel" her obvious lies.

Not buying thanks.


You realize one of the claims she made, and Comey called false, was having only 1 device right?

iPhone, iPad, iPad mini and a Blackberry.......

 

If you can get past this point, you'll be the first to explain to the rest of the world how two phones cannot be construed as one common devise; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTcRRaXV-fg

 

Boss, everyone sees your diversion from emails to phones. Stop embarrassing yourself.

I'll tell you the same thing I told another poster. You're trying to twist every analogy possible into one to make your own twisted version of the truth, and it never makes sense.

These guys already tried those tricks that the Right keeps trying to pedal; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTcRRaXV-fg You can forget it. Those tricks just don't work.