Congressman Claims Alien Tech Is Secretly Being Reverse Engineered By US Government

Congressman Claims Alien Tech Is Secretly Being Reverse Engineered By US Government (msn.com)

Interesting. Did he learn something from the classified briefings that Congress got about UAPs? I don't know.

He later says that Congress is being lied to and someone 'in the know' is feeding him information.

The questions are whether he's being fed a false narrative or whether he is being told the truth. Also, I didn't see a date for this discovery. Is it old information that's been circulated for years, or is this a new event? Who knows.

 

There is a battle going on between the Air Force and Navy about UAPs.

I don't know if it's aliens, or just something that Air Force and Defense contractors have developed in secret over the past 70 years.

If the Air Force or its contractors have anti gravity technology, it needs to be given to the public, and put in to use to improves people's lives.

I think 'disclosure' is really about forcing them to show us what we have, not about aliens.

 

I thought we had a combined military service, and they all worked together.

Anyway, I'm not sure that anti-gravity is real. But we do have some very real enemies of freedom in this world that could use such technology for the harm of us all.

Aliens exist, but I agree that disclosure is not about them.

 

I was watching this video with an objective attitude until I got to the 22:25 time mark.

UFO EXPERT DR. GREER REVEALS FIRST EVER PHOTO OF AN ALIEN - IMPAULSIVE EP. 107



Doctor Greer maintains that the fake Apollo moon missions* were real. A guy like that couldn't be that disconnected from reality. Maybe he's afraid to say they were faked for fear of "Committing suicide" or "getting killed in a traffic accident", or maybe that video was something that COINTELPRO** came up with to sow confusion.

Regarding post #1 – I don't rule it out but anything that comes from a mainstream*** source should be considered to be a lie until proven true.


*
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ers-are-corrupt.441261/page-2#post-1072215068
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-16#post-1072816044
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-16#post-1072816871
http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-moon-landing-is-fake.553296/page-15#post-1072797829
(video 40:10 time mark)

**
https://www.google.com/search?q=con...2j0i13i30.11826j1j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

***
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...at-the-lies-furiously.583345/#post-1072353798

 

You are incapable of that attitude. You have had your backside handed to you and have not an ounce of integrity to admit it.

The Apollo missions were not faked and anyone who maintains this in the face of irrefutable evidence is a troll.

Detailed here.

A totally moronic claim. The irony is that 99% of the batshit sources used by conspiracy theorists should have that consideration.

 

The services work together much like Democrats and Republicans do. I can give you examples from my 50 years in defense... endlessly.

 

Glad to see you have an open mind.

 

The consensus, of experts-- including, but not exclusively the U.S. military-- is that the capabilities of UAPs exceeds humanity's understanding of physics. That is from the government's own report, made public, last summer, as well as every aeronautics expert I've heard interviewed on the subject, including the person who used to run the unit at Lockheed Martin, that developed the most cutting edge, secret technology, for the U.S. military.

No one knows who is flying it, but it seems almost a certainty, humans did not create it

 

Really? You think having an open mind about something precludes assessing overwhelming and irrefutable evidence to form an opinion?

 

Aliens exist... and Biden is letting hem flow freely into the United States across a totally open border.

 

I don't think you know what overwhelming and irrefutable evidence means in this case. Was there, for example, overwhelming and irrefutable evidence the Trump campaign colluded with Russians to interfere in the 2016 election???The answer is no. Maybe the Trump campaign investigation shouldn't have been started, either?

 

I rather think you have misread my post or meaning. The evidence to which I referred to was in regard to the USA Apollo Moon landings.

You carry on. Find someone to argue that with because to me, that is at the lowest possible interest.

 

So, you admit that a lack of overwhelming and irrefutable evidence warrants an investigation of the Trump campaign but a lack of overwhelming and irrefutable evidence doesn't warrant an investigation of the results of the 2020 election???Which also means you care deeply that foreign countries don't influence our elections but a free and fair election isn't all that important?

 

Or has he been sprinkling funny mushrooms on his omelettes?

 

Dude, I think you need to learn how to read. I made a statement of complete disinterest in your "problems" with the US elections. Quite how you read that as me "admitting" anything you just posted is baffling. Go bother somebody else with your off-topic gripe.

 

Yeah! Sure!

 

So, now you're disinterested since I fundamentally used logic to dismantle your argument?

 

Weirdo alert. I was never interested in the first place. As I said, go bug someone else with your daft off topic griping.

 

In other words, you lost and are disinterested?

 

Dude, comprehension isn't your thing is it? There are no "other words", only the ones I typed. I'm talking about an off-topic troll comment concerning the lunar landings. I don't recall anywhere where your private gripe about Trump was raised by me or where I showed any interest at all. If you wish to discuss your baffling nonsense about elections, pick an appropriate thread and find someone who gives a rat's ass. If you think you "won" something with the weird responses you have made, then all I can say to you is "well done" and have a quiet little chuckle to myself.

 

What does this post of yours residing at the bottom mean? What is that overwhelming and irrefutable evidence you reference?

 

My post above. The bright blue link. Where I explain exactly what it refers to!

 

Doesn't refer to irrefutable evidence that Trump lost the 2020 presidential election?

 

What the hell are you talking about!? This is like pulling teeth. I am not interested in your off-topic gripe about US elections. I have no clue why you even think I have!

 

OK. Bye.