Congressman prescribes ivermectin

Tragic implications aside, it's astounding to behold the live, real-time formation of an 'echo chamber'.

 

Where is the link to that ?

Maybe you should lodge your complaints to the people doing the trials. You do have an Doctorate in medicine. Personally,I’m not qualified to tell Mass General and John’s Hopkins et al they don’t know what they are doing. Do you feel you are ?

 

Amazingly, the bain of the right - Rachel Maddow - talked about monoclonal antibodies every night for weeks.

 

In 2020? No.

 

No thanks.

 

200 congress critters have been treated with Ivermectin. Just sayin.

 

That does matter. That’s not enough. I thought conservatives were conservative. I guess they’re wild eyed extremists. Didn’t you guys once upon a time, only accept things that were proven beyond on reasonable doubt. Now your willing to go with anyone, anytime,anywhere.

 

Of course...it's only for the ruling class. The proletariat has to get the experimental vaccines with unknown long-term effects.

 

We have evidence on the long term effects. The vaccine type has been around decades using the same nRNA techniques since 1987.

 

You can not dodge by saying 2020.

First, let's remember that the root methods of fighting pandemic, masks, social distancing, etc., do not make anyone rich and have not changed over time. Yet, the right wing made a case out of their desire for that defense to fail, for some reason I do not understand.

Beyond that, all of western science based medicine has been oriented to testing possible solutions in clinical trials before telling the population that then need to ingest these substances.

What you seem to be suggesting is that you really can no longer tolerate this aspect of modern medicine.

And, that makes me wonder what the HELL you would replace it with.

 

You would take medical advice from congressmen?

Our congressmen are well known for not knowing much of anything about medicine or science in general, for that matter.

 

Along with many posters here. Ivermectin has proven its effectiveness so many countries use it to fight Covid. If it were allowed to be used here it would negate the EUA and not benefit big pharma or the authoritarian politicians that want to force you to take an experimental gene therapy.

 

Where I live, that means you can't go to a bar, restaurant, many indoor or outdoor public events, or be employed by many employers.

If the "typhoid Mary's" move away from here, that's fine.

 

This is just plain BS.

There is NO "gene therapy" going on. Ivermectin has NOT been shown to be effective against COVID in ANY legitimate clinical trial. And, the very idea that this ivermectin issue is being affected by dollars is ridiculous.

Beyond that, what EUA are you talking about? And, be specific.

 

I drove past Schultz's Beer Garden last night and the place was packed. Not a mask to be seen anywhere.

God Bless Texas.

 

Amen - Texas does need some god to bless it.

 

You sure? We're doing really well at the moment. Several large corporations are coming to the immediate area around me, Tesla, Apple, Dell, and even a new soccer stadium. Cranes all over Austin building new structures downtown, and even cleared out most of the homeless off the street.

My home's value has doubled in the last year, and I've not done a thing to it.

 

Where did they put the homeless?

 

Don't know, don't care.

 

"Don't care" is one one of those things about Texas.

 

You don't seem to have the slightest clue on what you are commenting on.

 

If you had a cite, you would post it.

 

California cares, go there.

 

Nothing. The right never had a plan nor do they stand for anything but money grabbing

 

I do love how you prove you know so little about this.

If an effective treatment were available there could be no EUA for the experimental gene therapies.