Cop Brutally Beat a Child for Riding Her Bike, Charges HER with Assualt

Who's law?

You're decerebrate version of it???

 

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/
Actually it's the State of Washington's version.
PS:I see you learned a word..oooo
Also:You have a warped sense of what's right and wrong if you support that Mall security guy doing that.

 

we should give this type of thing a name... the Zimmerman syndrome

 

Soooooooooooo...

What is your decerebrate "interpretation" is what the law is and how it applies to this police officer in this case?

I'll wait...

 

Here's a hint for you wanna-be-Einstein:It's not a police officer.
For someone that's calling someone else "decerberate" you're pretty ignorant.
Mall security is NOT police officer.
See:"Paul Blart:Mall Cop"

 

For someone who has a link and can't post a quote from it to prove your decerebrate point, you seem to exemplify what ignorance truly is.

Your ignorance is all you have yet to post concerning this issue.

How typical.

 

Funny thing is...you don't know what she said, either. But you've already chosen your side.

 

A mall security officer would've warned them about cutting through traffic in the lot and probably just let them go.
Cops on the other hand are trained to force compliance by any means necessary.
"Would he have treated his own daughter like this for talking back " most likely Not.
The main job of a police officer is public servant, not storm trooper or inforcer.
Some "crimes" just aren't that serious.

 

Actions speak louder than words. The cop appeared to be writing her a citation for riding through a stop sign (the wide white stop line is the clue). She decides she's just going to leave, then while the arrest is taking place she resists. However, the tazer calmed her down quickly.

 

Moral of the story: 1) when the police officer tells you, you are getting a citation.....you're getting a citation. The proper place to fight the ticket is in court. 2) Resist and you get what she got.

 

But we live in America, the land of the free and justice for all and what not.
If it were me I would have taken her by the arm and led her to the office and called her parents, or possibly just warned them and let them go.
Opinions like yours are why we have almost twice as many people in prison as China.

 

Here:
"(7) It is a gross misdemeanor for any person who per-
forms the functions and duties
of a private security guard to
use any name that includes the
word "police" or "law enforce-
ment" or that portrays the individual or a business as a public
law enforcement agency"

http://www.dol.wa.gov/business/securityguards/docs/the-law-relating-to-private-security-guards.pdf


It doesn't matter if he's a law-enforcement officer at his other job.
The job he was doing is not "law-enforcement"

All you posted was rhetoric.Let's see you make an assertion and back it up with some research.

 

Just as I suspected!

You don't know the law.

You posted a law that doesn't apply to this case and this police officer.

Try again...

 

Watch the video again, she was having none of being lead by the arm anywhere.....now what? It's just silly to think everyone will comply with being "taken her by the arm and led her to the office'. When she refuses to go what will you do then?

 

It does apply.Prove to me with a reference link how it does not.Mall Cop does not equal law enforcement officer.EVER.
Sure.I had a friend that was mall security.He had zero law enforcement officer capabilities.
He actually used his job to take out aggressions on thieves.
Pretty much what the guy in the video did.
There's a difference, though.My friend is 5'10" and was taking on people bigger than him.
6-foot something man thrashing a juvenile like that is unacceptable.
Period.You don't get that? Even 90% of the time even if mob rules that would apply.Nobody's going to put up with that.
Seriously..Right is right and wrong is wrong.I suppose to you it's all gray and laws.Well...You never got to enjoy the good cartoons or little rascals i guess.
I did..and everyone before me did, too.
Whatcha think of that?

 

You are not even capable of understanding the law excerpt you posted.

It does NOT apply in a case like this.

 

It absolutely apples.
Get back with me when have something besides rhetoric.Rhetoric only takes you so far.
You make baseless statements.Back it up or shut up.
Please use your rhetoric next time you are arrested and let me know how that goes for you.

 

I'll get back to you when you come up with an actual LAW that APPLIES to your decerebrate case you're ignorantly (lamely) attempting to make and we will have something to discuss.

 

And more rhetoric.
In other words:You have nothing contributable.
PS:I bet about 80% of the people viewing this side with me.

 

Name-dropping doesn't give validity to your decerebrate and utterly ignorant "argument".

Try again...

 

Assault?

I prefer the term "forced compliance".

People need to teach their kids about authority and how to follow directions. If they don't, this is what you get. The police aren't going to allow people to disobey, get mouthy, or otherwise be disrespectful. Once people think they can get away with these things, they will push the limits. This is what you get when people think they are above the law.

- - - Updated - - -

I don't shoot off my smart mouth. I was taught to respect authority.

As a result, I have never been subject to corporal punishment. See how that works?

 

Not body slam her on the ground, she was 15 years old riding a bike and stopped for a safety infraction, of course she was rebellious he should have warned her about parking lot traffic and let her go.
If everyone was as unquestioning and compliant of supposed authority figures as you think we should be there would have never been a Revolutionary War we would still be kissing azz to the red coats.
Respect has to be earned, do you think he did this for her safety?
It's not about his hurt ego, he's getting paid to be a public servant, to protect the best interest of the people, which includes her.

 

"of course she was rebellious he should have warned her about parking lot traffic and let her go"

Why? She broke the law, it's her responsibility to learn the rules of the road which is the same as those for motorized vehicles..

She was obviously guilty of the infraction, none of it would have happened if she just took the citation and learned from it.

 

There is no law that disrespectful justifies a cop dragging you around by your hair, smack your face in the pavement, and tasering. And you fail to accept such reality and sweettalk police brutality by some skinhead.

 

Dragging a person by their hair.... that's assault.

The people are not going to allow police officers demand respect by dragging little girls around by their hair.

There is no law that gives a cop the right to apply corporal punishment if the cop thinks he doesn't get enough respect. That your opinion is that he should, is irrelevant. He aint above the law. And the LAW needs to be respected. That's how it works.