Well, for the benefit of anyone else still reading; Gain of function research certainly can be bona fide (at least indirectly) and certainly can be for "other peaceful purposes". There are certainly legitimate questions about the risk/benefit balances and how it should be carried out but it is not and never has been unilaterally illegal. Regardless, that has nothing to do with COVID vaccines and little to do with the COVID virus itself unless you can also demonstrate that it was intentionally manufactured using gain of function techniques for something other than peaceful purposes. It should be noted that this constant shifting between talking about the vaccines and the COVID virus just adds confusion. The claims about each is quite distinct and should be clearly presented separately. Those are simply lies that anyone who cares to actually read the link I provided can see. It is interesting how often you find an excuse not to engage with challenges and criticism of your assertions. I don't see how where the thread is currently sitting should make any practical difference and you did use the word "conspiracy" in your OP (and note that even a conspiracy theory that turned out to be entirely true would still be a conspiracy theory).
I told you I no longer post in this section, if you want engagement move the thread out of here. Say whatever you want, I dont give damn.
Yes, I saw that but not everything is about you. My main reason for replying is more for anyone else reading the thread who might otherwise take your assertions at face value.
Another doctor who says the covid vaccines are killing people... Update on the COVID “Vaccines”: Dr. Russell Blaylock https://www.globalresearch.ca/update-covid-vaccines/5884383 (excerpt) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dr. Blaylock is a nationally recognized neurosurgeon, health provider, lecturer, and editor of and reviewer for medical journals. Dr. Blaylock was one of the early medical professionals who warned of the faulty treatment of Covid by the medical establishment, warned of the dangers of the “vaccine,” and supported the use of Ivermectin and HCQ as both preventatives and cures. As he is in private practice, he couldn’t be fired for telling the truth.
Uhuh. But we're all still alive and just fine. How many years of totally provable population growth consistent with projections will it take before this horseshit stops?
Please post some of your sources. What do you think of this? Philippines Covid Depopulation Programme: Fewer births and excess deaths during 2020-2023 result in 1,3 million fewer Filipinos https://expose-news.com/2024/11/09/philippines-covid-depopulation-programme/
Posted many times and ignored. I think you need to adopt a better barometer of reality than batshit, conspiracy websites. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/philippines-population/
Please link to the the ones that deal with projections. Different sources say different things. https://supersally.substack.com/archive Mainstream sources* are know liars. How do you decide which sources have info that reflects reality? * http://politicalforum.com/index.php...at-the-lies-furiously.583345/#post-1072353798
Why? You dismiss every source that is mainstream based on a ridiculous blanket reason. Batshit sources say batshit. Nope. Batshit sources are known liars. You label EVERY source that contradicts your preloaded opinion as "mainstream". Ludicrous blanket reasoning. You ignore the websites that deliberately lie and apply no such blanket reason against their claims. That's dishonest. I go with science, educational establishments, journals that follow replicatable results. I weigh that up against the likelihood of any event, the number of participants needed and the chances of these people keeping it a secret. I then look at the opposing view that presents an invariable moronic narrative that is easily disproven.
Not very impressive. Ridiculing is not debunking. As I've told you before, the info in the sources I post is consistent with what I see happening and the info in the sources you post is not consistent with what I see happening. The viewers can decide whose info is consistent with what they see happening. Mainstream science journals seem to be under the same control as the mainstream press. You seem to get all your info from such sources. http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-2#post-1072652969 http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-2#post-1072771889 http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-3#post-1072886629 http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-3#post-1074006680 http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-4#post-1074043812 http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-5#post-1074870603 http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-5#post-1074979233 http://politicalforum.com/index.php...-lies-furiously.583345/page-5#post-1074976200
Really? You dismiss EVERY single source because it disagrees with your claim - regardless of whether it is mainstream or not. You simply apply the blanket "mainstream" label to the source, refer to a bogus example as a catch-all to dismiss everything and wave it all away. That is an absurd way for anyone to assess data. You have been given countless examples of lies from "alternate" sources and simply do not make the same deceptive generalization. Debunking is debunking whether you like it or not. A spam statement that has precisely zero credibility. Another spam statement. NOBODY will be seeing any of this "happening". NOBODY "sees" population increasing or decreasing, NOBODY sees large volumes of people dying or anything related to this foolish claim. I give you a source that completely debunks your known deceptive "alternate" website and you simply ignore it. An absurd statement. A cast of millions all lying once again. You wave it all away so that is a very inaccurate observation. Did this look like a science journal to you? https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/philippines-population/ More: https://www.statista.com/statistics/578726/total-population-of-philippines/ https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/PHL/philippines/population https://tradingeconomics.com/philippines/population https://www.census.gov/popclock/world/rp
The viewers can look at the info you post and the info I post and know which info is consistent with what they observe. You're not going to convince anyone that they're not observing what they're observing. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...billion-people.590753/page-13#post-1074834869 Updated Pandemic Years Response Summary and Vital Statistics: Global Summary from OWID; Vital Statistics Data for Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Macau, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan. https://supersally.substack.com/p/updated-pandemic-years-response-summary UK Gov. pauses COVID Vaccine roll-out to 5 to 11-year-old Children after 22% increase in Deaths among age group since NHS began to Vaccinate them https://expose-news.com/2022/09/17/uk-gov-stops-covid-vaccine-5-to-11-after-increase-in-deaths/ http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/excess-deaths-due-to-covid-and-the-vaccine.613477/ http://politicalforum.com/index.php...e-on-pregnant-women-and-their-fetuses.617907/ http://politicalforum.com/index.php...roductive-damage-after-covid-19-shots.618440/
Repeating the same spam statement and ignoring my true observation! May the viewers see you actually respond to this? Tell everyone how YOU personally "observe" population declines! I missed your reply to this: Did this look like a science journal to you? https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/philippines-population/ I gave you several more sources for the same data and you didn't even acknowledge them! Your own source links to a damn mainstream website from the Philippines!