Death To America

Ok, I'll do it for you.

Here is the utter CRAP of extreme far right wing sources that Zorro and some others are drawing their CRAP from....

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/1062...is-done-paying-their-student-loans-2024-04-24

 

Unless the words are carefully selected as a mob boss selects his words, and done by someone with a following and who has clout.

 

And Russian China, Iran, and Obama and his identity politics. Everyone has their own little beef to fight about.
No self respecting enemy would pass up a chance like that. A bunch of pampered, volatile students and supine leadership from the top.
It is a boiling cauldron in the democrat tent.

 

Fake News. It was the Babylon Bee. The Hyperlink should have been a dead give away for you.

 

Biden won the SC primary. He knew white liberals in Iowa and New Hampshire would go for this guy or someone else as left...



... and all he had to do was survive until South Carolina. The DNC didn't have to rig anything.

Unpopular Carter got to run in 1980 and Old Joe will get to run in 2024 if he wishes.

But if Old Joe steps aside on his own and Democrats nominate a popular, young centrist, Republicans could get swamped by an energetic, younger Democrat.

 

I said "sourceS" and it's still extreme far right wing CRAP.

 

Your claim is fake news. That is a Babylon Bee article, that's why I linked to it. But don't worry, you'll get better at this. But in the meantime, can you discuss the topic rather than trying to make your fellow poster the topic?

 

UPDATE:
So I just saw on sane-and-mainstream media a report of Arabic students at Columbia who are now camping out on the Green where students pass by on their way to classes, and when they see a Jewish student walk by they harass them and the report said they (camping pro-Palestinian Arabic students) are even "getting violent". When I see it reported on sane media I can begin to believe it. (There was no mention of "death to America".)

What is wrong with people?!! You would think a college student would have a grasp of the truth about such things. Jewish students are not the enemy! The problem is Zionism, and the Arabic students could even unite with many of the Jewish students in opposition to Zionism!

 

You were wrong when you denied it.

You seem to have this weird sense of reality that things do not become true, until, you hear it from a source you trust. That's false. Things are true as soon as they occur in the real world.

Truth is dependent on real world reality, not on your ability, or lack of ability, to select informed trustworthy sources.

Columbia Switches To Online Classes So Jewish Students Can Participate From The Attics Where They Are Hiding.



'NEW YORK, NY — In the wake of ongoing anti-Israel protests that have engulfed the school's campus, Columbia University announced it has switched to online classes so Jewish students can participate from the attics where they are hiding.'

'The school's leadership met earlier in the week to discuss options that would ease tensions on campus and allow Jewish students to continue their education without leaving the safety of the attics where they have been forced to take refuge from rampant antisemitism among large pockets of the student body.'

"I'm glad I can still do my coursework," one Jewish student said after the announcement was made. "After being relegated to hiding here in this attic, I was afraid that I'd start missing too many classes and my grades would suffer. Thankfully, the administration has been kind enough to give me online access to my classes right here in this attic while they allow violent antisemitic protests to sweep across campus. Thanks!"

'Though anti-Israel protestors were disappointed that they would have fewer opportunities to threaten and berate people on campus, Jewish students were relieved. "Online classes make it really convenient," said another Jewish student. "Whether I'm out of town, sick in bed, or hiding in an attic to avoid being assaulted by an angry mob who want me and everyone else of my ethnicity wiped off the face of the earth, I don't have to worry about missing any assignments."'

The faculty is also thinking about setting up special trains for them when they can be shipped off to 'safe places' where they can concentrate.

 

You seem to be the opposite. You trust known lying and unreliable sources. And now you compound the problem by objecting, for some very strange reason, to people requiring reliable sources. You're ready to swallow anything if it comes from a source you like without regard for reliability!! And you fault me?????



I just don't know how you conclude that "things don't become true" until I get it from a reliable source. That's a huge spin. And there is NOTHING to suggest it other than your mind. You don't seem to know the difference between something "becoming true" and something being confirmed by a reliable source.

And I still reject your story as you presented it of "leftists across America chanting 'death to America' ".

Rachel Maddow has said many, many, many things that were true and you rejected them. Did they "become true" only when you later saw them covered on some right wing rag site that you trust?

 

Fake News. It wasn't me who made a false argument based on an authority fallacy.

More fake news. I know that appeals to authority are a logical fallacy. What makes a fact true or false is whether it corresponds to reality, not who said it.

Because a fact is true or false independent of your knowledge of it.

You're still lost. You denied something because you didn't like the source. Then you found it verified by a source you value and then you were willing to admit it was true. You suffer from the flaw of verificationism. The fact was always true, the instant it happened, even while you were denying it.

More fake news. If Rachel Maddow says somethings true, it's true. Truth is dependent on reality, not who reports it.

Remember! The test of truth is the real world. If a statement corresponds with the real world, it's true. If it does not, it's false.

I'll give you an example. Math is a language, and you can tell lies in math. For example. The way to make up 16 from 4 equal groups is 4*4 = 16.

Now in mathematics there is an additional way Minus 4 * Minus 4 also = 16. But negative quantities are abstract entities, not real world entities, so while the second statement is mathematically true, it's not true in the real world, even if Rachael MadCow claims it is.

Hopefully this has straightened out your thinking on truth and reality. You're welcome!

'For goodness sake, stop striving to get your kids into Ivy League schools. They're toxic cesspools of anti-American leftism.'

https://pjmedia.com/paula-bolyard/2024/04/24/it-can-happen-here-n4928475

 

I think that decision on the part of the DNC is make or break. Run Biden and Trump wins. Run someone else and the someone else wins.

 

No. Words are protected speech. Actions required.

 

Ashin Wirathu in Myanmar has encouraged attacks on Muslim minorities at a time when a genocide against the Rohingia minority was underway. A very nasty piece of work.

Warakagoda Sri Gnanarathana Thero in Sri Lanka has called for the stoning of Muslims against the backdrop of Buddhist mobs attacking Muslims. He has also led attacks on more moderate Buddhist monks who did not agree with him and on the Tamil minority in Sri Lanka. Another very nasty piece of work.

Both monks led or were senior in organizations involving other monks that promoted a violent strain of religious ethno-nationalism which has resulted in attacks on other ethnic & religious groups.

Knowing that you are just going to handwave this away or ignore it I'm not going to dig up the names of monks who have committed rape & murder in places like Thailand (there are numerous examples) or other 'bad' monks. Suffice to say there are plenty.

 

It is illegal and criminal to threaten the life of the president, a judge, a juror, a policeman . . . . -with words.

 

Yes. The words aren't illegal but they carry consequences since the law defines them as assault. The words aren't illegal. The assault is.

 

How do you determine whether the report of a Feb. 25, 2005 bombing outside a night club in Tel Aviv was Palestinians or a false flag Zionist group?

 

It is still a limitation on freedom of speech. And no action is required for it to be illegal.

 

I don't think these people watch Babylon bee. The humor would be lost on them. What they find funny is lawfare election interference. They gloat over one man's suffering. I cannot wait for the KARMA!!!!

 

At least we never made the mistake of supporting an authoritarian criminal for "president".

 

Do your own research.

 

Oh brilliant. You fault me for waiting for a news story I can trust while you have an opinion on it. So I ask you how you determine whether a story is true or not and you tell me to "do your own research"???? THAT'S WHAT I DID AND YOU FIND FAULT WITH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So what is your "sure-fire" method or source for getting the "truth"?

Far right wing lying rags while you reject researched, historically accurate, reliable mainstream sources.

WTF has this world come to.

 

Now, there is no need to try to make this all about you, rather than the topic. You with regularity, go all caps and claim something is false because the key hole you have set on sources hasn't told you that it's ok to believe it yet. I was simply telling the very obvious fact that it's true as soon as it occurs independent what any particular source says or doesn't say.

Truth corresponds to reality. That is the test for truth. Check the fact against the real world.

That's because they lie and propagandize. Look at how long they concealed that Hillary purchased the dossier?
Look at how long they concealed that Carter Page was CIA asset?

Look at how long they lied about the fact that the FBI was illegally spying on the Trump Administration.
Look at how long they lied about COVID coming out a bio lab.
Look at how long hey concealed that Fauci was behind the COVID research that produced COVID.
Look at how long they lied about "herd immunity"
Look at how long they claimed the vaccines were 94% effective at preventing infection and transmission when it did neither?
Look at how long they concealed the dangerous side effects of the vaccine.
Look at how long they lied about the effectiveness of ivermectin.

They lie constantly and consistently in the service of DNC propaganda.

I have no idea, after all the lies, how you can tell anyone with a straight face that they are 'researched, historically accurate, reliable'?

You can't be blind to the reality here.

The proposition that most closely fits reality is the most likely to be true.

1) What you call 'researched, historically accurate, reliable' will most often confirm the Left's narrative regardless of the truth.

 

You made it about me when you suggested "my problem" was that I didn't read the far right sources you read.

 

Yeah, thanks. Read for the first time. Seems to reflect the crap you are always spewing.