Before History Channel became about Alien coverups and Bigfoot, it actually covered fact based history. They created a documentary about the facts and myths of 9/11. It mostly consisted of Popular Mechanics vs. Alex Jones and the filmmakers of Loose Change. So which side do you take? The official word or the conspiracy angle? [video=youtube;GToWkNGldrs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GToWkNGldrs&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/video]
oh ... of course & the evidence points to 19 radical Arab hijackers who take control of airliners and crash into buildings? or possibly something else? what constitutes EVIDENCE here?
I've just heard a lot of absurd conspiracy theories. The most ridiculous is that the planes crashing into the twin towers were CGI. I posted the video because it really shows the lunacy of the Truthers and the reason behind the facts. The idea that hundreds or even thousands can keep such a secret is beyond absurd. It's also silly when Truthers claim those who disagree with them as agents of the NWO.
It's one of the more bizzare 'theories' floated by truthers here...As if thousands of witnesses were in on the conspiracy when the second jet hit, and All kept their mouths shut since then...
can it be in any way documented that "thousands" of people laid eyes on "FLT175" and positively IDed it as a commercial airliner? how many actual documented reports of people who would say that they personally saw an airliner, and that is an object that they could be sure was indeed an airliner, and indeed saw it hit the south tower? also note that "eye witnesses" are notoriously inaccurate. the photographic evidence is very damning with regards to proof of fraud.
ONE or two witnesses can be inaccurate,not thousands....they saw a United Airlines jet fly into the tower....period NO proof of fraud exists,stop digging yourself in a hole
if it isn't documented, then you can NOT claim thousands of people saw the alleged airliner. much less actually observe the alleged penetration of the south tower by "FLT175" I'm very serious about this, if you can not come up with thousands of witness statements that state that they got a visual on the aircraft and positively identified it as an airliner, the there really isn't anything at all except an unsupported assertion here.
The proof that it was an inside job is crushing. Here's a link to a post which has some of it. http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=349073&page=2&p=1063740783#post1063740783
It would be nice if this topic can be discussed without either opinion being belittled. I am on the side that the 9/11 terrorist attack happened as unfolded. I see no links or evidence to supporter a conspiracy. However, I'm always willing to be proven wrong. Let's start with the video I posted. Popular Mechanics put together a solid case. Loose Change and Alex Jones didn't. Why is that?
First of all ... Alex Jones is a buffoon! Popular Mechanics has sold out to Satan. #1 smoking gun, WTC7 exactly how is it that WTC7 could fall as it did and caused by fire? Have you seen the video of WTC7 collapsing?
to quote BATTY ...... GRAVITY WORKS! or something ..... big question is can you expect to see the result, ( that is the destruction of WTC 1, 2 & 7 ) as a consequence of chaotic damage & fire?
Did you even bother to watch my video? Not all buildings are built the same. How they come down can depend on what caused it to come down. WATCH THE VIDEO!
Yes I actually watched the video, all I can say is WHAT A WASTE! its a white-wash job, solid proof that the mainstream media has become a propaganda machine operating in the interests of big money, not the workers.
I'm starting to thin I'm just being trolled. How is that response an acceptable answer? If the video is a waste tjen explain what they goy factually wrong.
