I have a hard time believing that this Democrat judge, and Clinton appointee, has pure intentions. In fact, this appears to be the exact opposite of what the judge claims this to be. It would appear that this judge hopes to reeducate Mr. D'Souza, and is indeed applying punishment from a place of bias.
Unless you have the audacity to disagree with an appointed official. Then you're crazy and must be forcibly reeducated until you see things the correct way. A grovelling apology wouldn't hurt either.
Frankly, I'm not sure why donating 20k in someone else's name is such a grievous offense in the first place. I don't vote for a candidate based on the people that donated to them. I vote for a candidate based on my opinion that they represent my views. That's what you do in a Republic. If the candidate does something corrupt based on the influence of their donors, then it's the candidate that directly violated my trust, not the donor.
D'Souza was circulating that FAKED picture of a young Hillary with a Confederate flag on her father's bookshelf. So he may not be crazy....but he's definitely a lying sack of s***. No wonder Laura Ingraham couldn't even stand him.
Pretty funny how fans of Obama and future voters of Hillary Clinton are complaining about lying all of a sudden
D'Souza is a proven liar. Either he knows he lies...or he's so delusional he believes his own lies? Want a link?
So you just admitted you think BOTH are liars. Now, claim D'Souza is "just as crazy as Hillary"...and you'll have completely refuted the OP. - - - Updated - - - MOD EDIT - Reply to Deleted
Yeah I read that article and was going to post about it but the stupidity of the Obama administration's travesty of a deal with Iran hit the news and I got distracted. Yes this Dem Party activist judge is a combination wacko and a vindictive party thug in judge's robes. I thought it particularly amusing when he was talking about the nature of D’Souza's ego and mental issues when it's actually the judge himself displaying an over the top ego and serious mental issues. But what are you gonna do? D' Souza is totally screwed because any judge in such a position is essentially god and his wacko rulings are set in stone unless a review board decides to take him on . . . and what are the chances of that happening with this particular case? What are the chances that a review board would not also be stacked with vindictive Democrats?