Democrats’ First Bill Attacks Free Speech Rights Of Conservatives

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by XXJefferson#51, Jan 27, 2019.

  1. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The day the new Democrat majority took power in the U.S. House of Representatives they announced the introduction of H.R. 1 [23], the so-called “For the People Act of 2019.” It will surprise no conservative observer that the bill is not “for the people” so much as it is for the Far-Left Progressive special interest groups and incumbent Democrat politicians.

    Yesterday, our friends at the Institute for Free Speech released an exhaustive analysis [24] of three speech-chilling sections of HR 1. Those provisions would regulate political speech on the Internet, violate the privacy of advocacy groups and their supporters, and compel speakers to include lengthy government-mandated messages in their communications.

    "By making it harder for Americans to speak about government, a better title for the bill would be the 'For the Politicians Act,'" said Institute for Free Speech President David Keating.

    The Institute's analysis finds these sections of H.R. 1 would benefit politicians and campaign finance attorneys while harming the public. The legislation's many restrictions and regulations on speakers would make it harder for Americans to promote ideas about government and to hold elected officials accountable. H.R. 1 would also subject speakers to increased costs from legal and administrative compliance, liability risk, and would harm donor and associational privacy for civic groups that speak about policy issues and politicians.

    "H.R. 1 appears to be a slapdash effort to stitch together every unworkable and unconstitutional idea from the past decade about how to increase regulation of Americans' free speech rights," said Institute for Free Speech Senior Fellow Eric Wang. "While the bill may be dead on arrival, it is nonetheless a deeply troubling statement of Congress's priorities and attitudes towards the First Amendment." http://www.conservativehq.com/print/29557 This article describes in great detail about the summary above. It is an all out assault on conservatives free speech rights. It’s a very long read but covers the intensity of the democrats desire to regulate and limit the speech of their opposition.
     
    RodB, Blaster3, Bondo and 6 others like this.
  2. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What they really want is the donor lists of all the conservatives organizations so that they can leak them to allied pressure groups for doxxing purposes and to harass donors like they did to pro prop 8 donors in California after it initially passed.
     
    headhawg7, Blaster3 and TheGreatSatan like this.
  3. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    24,514
    Likes Received:
    7,251
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You are the only country with actual, proper free speech.

    Dont **** it up because when rights are lost they dont come back without violent insurrection.
     
  4. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,245
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Democrats want to make anything politically right wing considered a threat and therefore illegal if you say it/wear it. They are fascist trying to criminalize their political Opposition. Americans need to wake up to the threat that globalist democrats are becoming to our nation state. They will fundamentally transform America into something like Venezuela.
     
  5. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,245
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They will make things like wearing a maga hat a hate crime.
     
  6. Baffled

    Baffled Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2018
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    43
  7. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    61,090
    Likes Received:
    19,117
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks for proof that you don't give a crap about free speech.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2019
  8. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,245
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The collective aims to control speech, not free it.
     
  9. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,670
    Likes Received:
    21,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The bill is only dead on arrival because of the Republican Senate. Which is for now, our ONLY safeguard from a dangerous, destructive politics that have been unearthed as a 'response' to the 2016 elections. We need to replenish the House with effective people in 2020 and 2024.
     
    headhawg7, Blaster3, Gatewood and 3 others like this.
  10. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,245
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If we don't we're heading for a totalitarian police state. Hide anything that could be deemed offensive or be charged with a hate crime. They will no doubt go over these forums and punish their political opposition as well. Already seen them making list in preparation.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  11. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Without a doubt!
     
  12. FatBack

    FatBack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    58,254
    Likes Received:
    54,524
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And WE are the brownshirts….
     
  13. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They already heavily censor us over on the other site I participate at. They use a liberal so called fact checker as the gate keeper as to what us unwashed Christian and conservative masses can seed there and call it community standards.
     
    Blaster3 and TheGreatSatan like this.
  14. FatBack

    FatBack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    58,254
    Likes Received:
    54,524
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Cant wait to be a subject, can you?
     
  15. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,670
    Likes Received:
    21,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    3 Democratic Presidential candidates( Senators Warren, Harris and Sanders) all made disqualifying statements against the First Amendment of the Constitution. If you can't defend the first, you can't be President.
     
  16. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you want to restrict their right to free speech.
     
    Richard The Last likes this.
  17. Baffled

    Baffled Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2018
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    43

    Yup! Whatever it takes to silence racists and bigots.
     
  18. Baffled

    Baffled Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2018
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    43

    Keep it in your prayers!
     
  19. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Actually it was they who want to restrict our free speech and as a result they can not be allowed to rule over us as President. One Obama was one too many.
     
  20. Baffled

    Baffled Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2018
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    43

    I have been a subject all my life. It is about time you all feel what we felt. Only then will you have empathy
     
  21. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But you're saying they can't say something and be President. Which, of course is not true unless you want to violate their free speech to say something.
     
  22. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That’s typical of secular progressives everywhere. Label their domestic opposition as racists and bigots and then disenfranchise and objectify us so that they can rationalize the persecution they intend for us deplorables and bitter clingers to our God, Bibles, and guns.
     
    headhawg7, TheGreatSatan and FatBack like this.
  23. FatBack

    FatBack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    58,254
    Likes Received:
    54,524
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nice assumption about an anonymous guy on the net. Bonus points for use of victim card.
     
    TheGreatSatan and XXJefferson#51 like this.
  24. Baffled

    Baffled Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2018
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    43

    I know you are but what am I?
     
  25. Baffled

    Baffled Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2018
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    117
    Trophy Points:
    43

    Turn around is fair play
     

Share This Page