Democrats attempting to eliminate Republican candidates

Don't need to. Reality will take care of that soon enough.

Suffice it to say, BS.

 

When a Cry Baby Loser can't handle the truth, rejects democracy and the rule of law when he loses, he could normally be ignored, but this one, for inexplicable reasons, has accrued an irrational cult that has shown it will resort to violence when reality doesn't fit their worshipful dogma.

That is troubling.

 

Protesting corrupted elections is democracy in action. As for worshiping elected officials, Democrats had FDR, JFK, Bill Clinton and Barrack Obama. All Republicans have is Ronald Reagan at that level of popularity.

 

Geez, you've been whining that same song for 3+ years.

Might want to try a different hymnal sometime.

 

Enlighten us.

 

And Lincoln. Of course that was when the Republicans would have been considered the "liberal" party

Meanwhile who have they had since Reagan?

Bush Sr.
Bush Jr

Gee, I wonder why they don't hold them up as Presidents to "revere"

 

The point is the adoration to the point of coronation is more likely to happen on the left. The Bush tandem was left out intentionally because I would agree with you that they didn't belong top shelf.

 

Trumpian inversion alert!

Yet another Trump disciple making up this “adoration to the point of coronation” nonsense, when they know that Trump wants to be dictator/king, and would have a coronation if he thought he could. (After all, if his dreams come true,there will never be another election).

 

The Supreme Court decision Chevron v. NRDC is actually what's at the heart of progressive attacks on both Trump and Clarence Thomas. It's sheer panic produced by the likelihood that it will be reversed in June, all of the absurdities of progressive politics will be obliterated in an instant, the Left will have to go back to legislating in the proper Constitutional manner, and that will make all their fondest wishes impossible to implement.

To put it in a way that an ordinary person like yourself might understand ask yourself a simple question. You're in construction and if Chevron is not overturned in June, how are you going to like being forced to do your work with electric concrete mixers and road pavers?

"What?!?", you might say. "I never agreed to that!"

Of course you didn't. Nobody did. Ever.

But that's how progressives like it and have rigged it.

The death of democracy in this country has nothing whatsoever to do with Donald Trump. It's literally been decades in the making.

And so far, Trump's been the only one who's even come close to saving it.

 

As far as kook fascist revisionism goes, this is the kookiest.

For as long as the USA has existed, the system works like this:

The legislative branch votes in a broad framework of the law.

The executive branch them implements the details of the law.

If there are disagreements over those details, the courts hammer it out.

Think about it. It's common sense. The legislature doesn't tell you to use schedule B for your tax deductions. The executive does that, along with a million other details that would be impossible to vote on seperately.

The neofascists wants to change that. They say they know better than the past 200+ years of history. According to them, if the legislature, say, doesn't specifically specify the location of each voting machine, then you can't have a voting machine there.

And that's the point of it. It's a rather blatant attempt at election-rigging by the neofascists.

 

As usual, you're wrong.

But nice try though.

 

It will be nonexistent.

 

I noticed that you failed to acknowledge proof of Democrats denying election results.

 

Did the voices tell you that you presented such proof?

I just ask because nobody else saw this "proof".

Do try to remember that gaslighting won't work on those who are intelligent and informed. You know, the liberals, the reason-based population. Claiming that you did something while not doing it, the staple tactic of you and the GOP, that only works on the mentally feeble.

 

This one actually thinks that congress passes a law saying which tax form to send in.

And to think these people vote, and that their vote counts as much as a normal person's.

This is not a debate, no matter how badly reality triggers you. The legislature passes laws specifying the broad framework, and then the executive fills in the details to implement the law.

 

Again, you're just wrong.

No point in even discussing it further. I have a feeling it'll be a rude awakening for you in June.

 

It’s there. I’m not sure why you are denying it.

here it is again.

 

Interesting isn't it?

 

It's just mind boggling how the left accuse Republicans of vote suppression and wanting to take democracy away while Democrats are the ones who are actually doing it.

 

The way to see what they are doing is to look at what they accuse us of.

 

What's not to understand? Section five directs the enforcement of section 3 of the 14th amendment. Or does the far left not understand the straight forward wording of the 14th? Apparently, only following the parts of the Constitution they like is a Democrat specialty.

 

What's the point of lying so badly? Stating a proven fact -- that the Russians used propaganda to influence the election -- is not denying the election results, and only the most shameless partisan hacks claim that it is.

Thus, you do exactly that, to nobody's surprise.

Your side denies election results, ours doesn't, and your side lies about us to excuse doing it.

As always, I thank you for proving how correct I was, and I'll be in touch if I want you to prove any more of my points

 

The fake story you spin here.

Ah yes, the "UNLESS CONGRESS SPECIFICALLY ORDERS IT, IT'S ILLEGAL!" whackaloon legal theory.

Good luck with that. Has it ever fooled anyone who isn't in your cult?

 

Why June?

What crazy conspiracy theory says June is special?

 

You don't know what traditionally happens in June in DC?

Seriously?

Oh well, then I guess it'll just be a surprise for you.