Dems' top legal gun schemes to unseat Republicans by claiming 'voter suppression'

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by XXJefferson#51, Mar 27, 2021.

  1. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    But as crazy as it may seem, Stephanopoulos is perfectly serious. So is Elias.

    The effort to remove Miller-Meeks from Congress and put Rita Hart in her seat is Elias’ broader strategy in miniature. Under their interpretation of Article I, Section 5, Congress has an unbounded and uncontestable power to control who is and isn’t a lawmaker. For now, that theory is being put to use to wrest a single Iowa House seat away from Republicans. But armed with an expansive vision of how Article I, Section 5 can be used, there’s little reason to think Marc Elias would restrain his ambitions.

    https://www.wnd.com/2021/03/democrats-top-legal-gun-aiming-guarantee-partys-permanent-majority/

    HR1 is putting these vote stealing and election rigging proposals from high priced lawyers and op Ed writers into federal law. The attempt covered in the news here to steal a house seat from the voters of Iowa is simply a test of their master plan. They intend to disenfranchise voters in states that follow the constitution in how they run their elections.
     
  2. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How are the case in Iowa and HR1 related?
     
  3. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You will have to read the entire Real Clear Politics Investigations article linked above to see how they connect. The current house considerations regarding Iowa is a dry run for the rest should the filibuster be abolished.
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2021
  4. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's not RCP. It's WND. If you're not going to present a clear argument, I'll pass. The OP makes no sense. It's a conflation of two unrelated things with no explanation as to how they're connected. If you don't want to explain yourself, have fun. Otherwise, what is your point?
     
  5. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Proof you never read it or wanted to understand the points being made...


    [Editor's note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Investigations.]

    https://www.wnd.com/2021/03/democrats-top-legal-gun-aiming-guarantee-partys-permanent-majority/
     
  6. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    HR1 is a clear violation of the federal constitution regarding the judiciary and regarding how elections are run.
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2021
  7. lemmiwinx

    lemmiwinx Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    8,069
    Likes Received:
    5,430
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Voter suppression is the the new black is it? Wait that's the old black. If only black and brown people could get valid ID's so they could show them to vote. You think Bill Gates could weigh in on this massive conundrum?
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2021

Share This Page