Has anyone heard any of the Republicans wannabes mention the United Nations? I know how Ron Paul stands on US membership in the UN, but where do the others stand? Im not the best person to answer my own question because I made an effort not to pay attention to campaign blather. Ill gamble and say there was no criticism of the United Nations by a candidate. As always, criticizing the United Nations is off-limits. That goes to show you how powerful UN protectors really are. Candidates will say anything to win a voting bloc, but not a one of the wannabes dares court the largest voting bloc in the country; a bloc that crosses party lines. Im not talking about reforming the United Nations. Im talking about withdrawing. Reform is usually bandied about by UN supporters because the UN does not do enough. Condemning the UN for not doing more is the same as praising the UN with faint criticism. Incidentally, voters know that Newt Gingrich made an environmental commercial with Pelosi, but how many know he co-chaired a task force with Democrat George Mitchell in 2005? The two issued a report calling for UN reforms. To me, that is far worse than the Pelosi commercial: Gingrich was for the United Nations before he was against it Posted By Josh Rogin Thursday, August 11, 2011 - 5:13 PM http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/p...r_the_united_nations_before_he_was_against_it Diplomatic immunity If a future Administration finally gets up the courage to treat the UN like a private organization rather than a government diplomatic immunity would be the first thing to go. In fact, I would love to hear someone explain exactly why the employees of an organization needed diplomatic immunity to begin with? Nor should those representatives to foreign missions get diplomatic immunity. Diplomatic immunity should come through their embassies if it is deemed essential. Bottom line: It is one thing to give the boys and girls over at UN Plaza a clubhouse to hang around in, it becomes something else when club members are raised above American law with diplomatic immunity. (Id give my eye teeth to know what the New York City Police Dept. has been ordered to coverup so as not to embarrass the almighty UN.) Parenthetically, Hussein gave INTERPOL diplomatic immunity: Last Thursday, December 17, 2009, The White House released an Executive Order "Amending Executive Order 12425." It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select other "International Organizations" as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945. Wither Sovereignty Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next? By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton December 23, 2009 http://threatswatch.org/analysis/2009/12/wither-sovereignty/ Of course, if the UN insists on retaining diplomatic immunity status for gang members, UN headquarters could always be exiled to Saint Helena like Napoleon Bonaparte, or perhaps an island way out on the western end of the Aleutian Islands where it wouldnt matter what they do. Out of sight out of mind on a cold, desolate, island is the way to go if the UN cant be shut down completely. Those with a public voice who oppose US membership in the UN would should refute that organization head-on. Aside from a few scandals in recent years that could not be hidden everything negative about the UN has been kept in the shadows. To no ones surprise the media is the worst offender when it comes to protecting the United Nations although the media, or bureaucrats, who use their positions and tax dollars to further worldwide socialism are never called to account. The entertainment industry is not far behind the media. Did you ever hear a bad word said about the UN in a movie or TV show? More importantly, for 67 years the UN has been acquiring more and more influence and authority over sovereign nation. The UN simply increases its mandate when it wants something. Just imagine what the UN would be today if it could bypass treaty ratification! As it is the UN has a considerable number of US Senators quite willing to ratify UN treaties. In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UNs behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that. As it stands now, the UN has a judicial system, The World Court is an obscenity created by the UN which is itself an abomination. Legitimate or not, in addition to a judicial system, the UN controls a military force of some significance. Hell, that organization even prints its own postage stamps on American soil. Im not certain if the US Government Printing Office does the actual printing for the UN, but that is a topic worth looking into. No matter who prints UN postage stamps, I wonder what the US Postal Service thinks about that monopoly-breaker? Hell, the Girl Scouts and the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks might decide to turn themselves into a government. Then where we all be? Peacekeepers? Whenever totalitarian global government proponents talk about eliminating the cost of maintaining a military defense they dont tell you they simply want those savings diverted to increasing police powers in every country in the world. Its a lot easier for the global villagers to control a police state than it is for them to dominate military personnel in a bunch of sovereign nations. Neither individual liberties protected by a dedicated military or a UN police state can be had on the cheap. Whenever the global villagers talk about one international army dedicated to maintaining universal peace, I cant help thinking: That which is called a police force in a free society is called an army in a dictatorship. Just look at communist Chinas military today as well as every tin pot military dictatorship that ever was if you doubt me. The global government crowds hidden objective is to protect their own power, privileges, and assets in a revolution-proof world because cross-border wars can be prevented with a minimum amount of political courage exercised by a majority of freedom-loving sovereign nations. In short: The world does not require the United Nations to put an end to cross-border wars. Without any help from the UN worth mentioning, the United States and its allies standing fast against military conquest by an aggressive government is easier than eating ice cream. NOTE: Korea and Vietnam contained elements of civil war; nevertheless, America and its allies stopped Communist aggression in Korea, but lost in Vietnam thanks to American Communists and UN supporters. Finally, the revolutions that constitute the so-called Arab Spring is backfiring. Good revolutions that were supposed to bring freedom and democracy to the Middle East will end with totalitarian governments worse than the ones that were overthrown as well as increase the certainty of cross-border wars.
