Did Bribed Joe's U.S. Solicitor General Lie To SCOTUS On J6/Trump Case? Clean, well dressed and educated, privileged, and a liar? 'oral arguments began Tuesday morning at SCOTUS in Joseph Fischer vs. USA related to the Department of Justice’s use of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)—obstruction of an official proceeding—in its ongoing criminal prosecution of January 6 protesters. Fischer is one of roughly 350 J6 defendants charged with the post-Enron records-destroying statute weaponized by Joe Biden’s DOJ to punish Americans who protested Biden’s election that day. ' Per Bribed Joe and his goons, it's very bad to protest a rigged election. 'J6ers could go free after a majority of justices expressed skepticism at the government’s position during the hearing. Wondering aloud how Fischer even made it to the Supreme Court—never a Constitution handy on the CNN set when you need one—Dana Bash fearfully asked one legal expert about J6ers ensnared in 1512(c)(2) convictions, “could they be let out of jail?”' Indeed they could. As a Free Person, you have the RIGHT to notice of what the law is. You should never see "unprecedented" use of a statute. You should never see "unusual" use of a statute. The law was written to forbid and sanction particular conduct. Overzealous Democrat prosecutors pouring through the statutes to find something that they can stretch to cover a Republican that they oppose is NEVER a legitimate use of their power. This seems to be a perpetual surprise to these corrupt crooked politicized clowns trying to cloak their evil as "Justice". 'Prelogar did little to ease concerns over the government’s broad interpretation of 1512(c)(2) while admitting the statute has been and will continue to be selectively used against Jan 6 protesters and not other demonstrators who engage in similar conduct—particularly those aligned with Democratic Party interests.' Selective Prosecution is fundamentally unjust. Bills of Attainder are forbidden our system, never is a person guilty because of who they are, rather than what they have done. Bribed Joe's Solicitor displayed a corrupt knowledge of the Administrations unjust and politically motivated acts by downplaying the 'harsh prison sentences for 1512(c)(2) convictions in Jan 6 cases—justices questioned her about the severity of a 20-year maximum sentence for interrupting a government function—Prelogar might have fatally damaged the credibility of her case'; she lied about 'the government’s handling of prison sentences for J6ers convicted of 1512(c)(2).' Prelogar corruptly concealed in her answer that 'prosecutors have asked for an average of 40 months in prison in those same 55 cases. For a handful of defendants, prosecutors recommended prison terms as long as 78 months.' 78 months is 6 years! If Judges would have gone along with 'the government’s excessive prison recommendations, a defendant convicted of 1512(c)(2) and other misdemeanors would be behind bars for over a year longer than what Prelogar represented.' She lied to the Justices when she claimed '“there's no reasonable argument to be made that the statutory maximum here is driving anything with respect to sentencing” demonstrably false. In fact, the DOJ routinely mentions in sentencing memos how “the Defendant faces a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment.”' When the prosecutor lies to the Court and obscures the facts, its a loud clear announcement that they know they have been conducting themselves corruptly. Please read the whole thing and discuss.
