Did Robert Mueller Defy A Court Order To Stop Lying About Russian Companies?

Ok, turn the boat a little, demonstrate that what Mueller has suggested is going to stand up in court, by citation. We can also play your silly game and clearly your aren't able to respond. So now what? You believe the fantasy when it suits you and you ignore the facts when they are inconvenient. If you believe that you can prove that either Concord (indicted by the Mueller investigation as a Russian gov't front" or IRA (also indicted as a Russian gov't front by Mueller) are actually proved as having done the things asserted by the Mueller camp. We have time, no one is going anywhere, so start typing... And because you won't, because you can't, and the judge presiding over the case has also precluded the prosecution from continuing representing the facts in this case as you have, you're continuing in your own version of flame baiting that doesn't represent the facts. So, are you concerned where you own ill behavior here is concerned? I bet not.

So, look deeply into your own mirror of ludicrous BS that you yourself are engaging in.

 

For the verbatim text you're looking for ... research Concord's motion, and what specific terms Concord's defense team challenged.

 

Great citation. If we actually need to cut and paste the language, obviously, we can. We shall see if the conspiracy nuts on the left continue to require it...

 

When the patriotic Republican who has served the nation honorably and heroically over his lifetime accepted the position of Special Counsel offered by the Trump Justice Department "to oversee the previously-confirmed FBI investigation of Russian government efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election and related matters" he was well aware that the fanatical dung-flinging brigade would be deployed against him.

I realized as soon as Newtie correctly enthused

Newt Gingrich‏
Verified account @newtgingrich
Robert Mueller is superb choice to be special counsel. His reputation is impeccable for honesty and integrity. Media should now calm down
5:17 PM - 17 May 2017​

that the slime was already oozing forth to assail him.

Mueller is the antithesis of a narcissistic p*ssy grabber who traffics in lies, and destined to incur the ire of worshippers of that sort of lowlife.​

 

Shoulda realized that literally spoon feeding the courts opinions would be absolutely necessary. Watch as the denials continue. Un freakin' believable. Mueller found guilty June 1st, but his repeat performance July 24th was A OK? Libs!

 

Seriously Jake he did say it on public TV during the hearings, so he very well have violated the gag order. I know your trying to divert but in this judge's eyes there is zero evidence which opens a whole lot of questions.

 

Another BS post screaming look over there instead of the smoke right in front of you. We know your game, zero facts and all hyperbole.

 

Easy to refute. This is the bottom line of the judgment:

"ORDERED that Concord’s motion for an order to show cause why Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III and Attorney General William P. Barr should not be held in contempt is DENIED"

So pretty much the opposite of what was suggested in the OP.

And it does NOT support what you claimed.

 

Well that was the first time and everyone knew that, we're talking about his discussion on national TV when Mules did it again.

 

Fanatical Trump bum kissers obsess over their messiah, but the national interests take precedent
.
Despite the hysterical tantrums - mewling "Witch hunt!" incessantly - the FBI, NSA, CIA, Republican-run Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Trump Justice Department's Republican Special Counsel all concluded that Russia conspired to pervert the US presidential election in 2016 by helping Trump and hurting Clinton.

Thoroughly investigating, exposing, and taking necessary steps to prevent such ongoing hostile attacks is vital for the nation's security, as the National Security Adviser who just quit the Trump regime affirmed.

 

Then let us know when he is actually held in contempt. After all, we have been told that no charges = exoneration. So as of today he is exonerated.

 

Not going to fly. Court found Mueller violated the gag, and cited the statute. Mueller's an ex-con.

 

That's the whole discussion and this is a message board to talk about a lot of possibilities. Lord knows we've listened to your projections for three years and none have come remotely true.

 

Lolz ... So "let the Mueller thing go"? 'cause he's a good guy?

 

Yet another BS post, I didn't vote for Trump, and we're not discussing Russian involvement. We're being very specific and you on the other hand are trying to conflate different things to reach another BS analogy about something this thread isn't about. The question at hand is did Mules violate the court order with his testimony, not whether the sky is blue because Russians are involved.

 

If the judge thought Mueller was innocent, he would have said so.

Clearly Mueller hasn't been exonerated.

 

Less than two months before Mueller’s testimony before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, Judge Friedrich ruled that Mueller violated pretrial publicity rules with his public statements regarding Concord and its co-defendant, IRA.

Boom. Another embarrasement for Mueller and his witch hunt.

Mueller’s team did not say in the indictment that IRA or Concord worked for the Russian government, nor could it produce any evidence to support the Mueller report’s claims of Russian government control or coordination with IRA or Concord. Mueller barely escaped contempt of court because (1) he violated a mere “standing court rule,” and not a court order (which she entered after the first violation); and (2) Mueller held a May 29 press conference to walk back public accusations that Concord and IRA worked on behalf of the Russian government.

 

Mueller's an ex-con who caught a break on June 1st. Just like ex-cons typically behave, Mueller catches a break June 1st ... then violates the conditions of his parole a month later. 1 more "strike" and Mueller's officially a "habitual offender".

 

Yeah ... it suggests Concord, not the Kremlin spammed Facebook.

 

Yes false unproven statements by the prosecutor can prejudice a jury.

 

If that is your sentiment, so be it.

The tools Putin used to help Trump and hurt Clinton should be properly identified, of course.

It is critical that the US not leave itself vulnerable to a repeat of the Russian subversion of the 2016 election.

 

If it cannot be established that Russia used the specific named entities in his efforts to help Trump and hurt Clinton in the 2016 election, they should not be named until that has been confirmed.

 

The tools the DNC used in coordination with Russia to hurt Donald Trump and spy on his campaign should be properly identified, of course.

It is critical that the DNC stops coordinating with foreign governments and rigging elections to stop the subversion of our country and leave us vulnerable to outside influences.

Funny how you always leave that out.

 

I was clarifying your sentiments. Mueller is above the law.