I want to read the reports showing the hijackers managed to get out of the airplane cockpits alive. Photos and dates of course must be included.
Why do people cling to fake theories? They seem hell bent to include George W. Bush in their fake stories.
The conspirators do not recognize Arabs flying the planes, they want the CIA to have flown them. Did the actual pilots remain home with their family? The passengers, perhaps they were a fiction too?
Cognitive dissonance? The official conspiracy theory is quite a whopper, eh? But millions still buy it as fact.
Bob, if you recall, several years back, you and I went round and round. I shall soon bow back out. I don't get much entertainment from this sort of fiction.
Uh the government violated all protocals that day,that is treason.that is why.Bush committed treason invading Irag instead of Afghanistan.duh. the government has failed miserably to prove their case to be true,the Op of this thread has taken everybody to school on this that it was an inside job,you might actually read his posts before sprouting off anymore nonsense. this is the most craziest fake story ever,it is 100 times more absurd and more fake than saying George W Bush is a fake theory. http://proliberty.com/observer/20030811.htm
as always,you take everyone to school. Only people who smoke weed will believe this fairy tale concocted by the Bush administration. thats hysterical that people like him by into THIS wacked job offcial conspiracy theory that they have failed to prove true. http://proliberty.com/observer/20030811.htm
well logical,open minded,and objective people such as the OP and myself dont get much entertainment from THIS sort of fiction,the official conspiracy theory of the governments. http://proliberty.com/observer/20030811.htm
the CIA and the mossad were behind it all.I posted three videos that have never been debunked earlier that prove that,you might try and watch them as well as read the posts of Bobs instead of only seeing what you WANT to see.
the understatement of the century. what i find comical is how they play dodgeball dodging facts you post evading them always changing the subject asking how and how such and such happened expecting us to know all the answers of EVERYONE involved in nonsense like that as though WE were involved in it or something.Instead of looking at the evidence which proves the government lied and not trying to refute the facts.
I don't quite recall but I don't get any entertainment myself from fiction. That's why I like to stick to facts as much as possible. And the facts are that the story you bought is filled with nonsensical fairy tales made for children. Science has proven one of the cornerstones of the official story, that WTC7 was brought down strictly by thermal expansion due to fire (per NIST's theory), is an impossible fraud. Once the study is peer reviewed and accepted by experts, it will become settled fact.
Impossible fraud indeed.anybody who believes that fiction of the NIST reprt on bld 7 is a complete idiot the fact that Barry Jennings witness testimony proves it pure bull$hit.
Thats comedy gold when they get so desperate to prove the case of the governments to be correct that they start grasping at straws using popular mechanics. She obviously has never read Griffins book that debunks that crap Debunking 9/11 debunking,an answer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the offiical conspiracy theory.duh.
she not only sprouted silly unproven nonsense,but as i just said,also obviously never read Griffins book that debunks all that trash and nonsense she worships as the gospel truth.
yeah he fell for THIS conspiracy theory of the governments hook,line,and sinker as all official conspiracy theory apologists have. http://proliberty.com/observer/20030811.htm
I know you've decided to "bow out" Robert when the facts inconveniently contradict your worldview but I'll ask you this anyway. If science (peer reviewed and accepted by experts) shows that the NIST "investigation" is filled with illegitimacy and as a result, their concluding theory is null and void (i.e. impossible), which one would then be the FICTION in your estimation, NIST's theory or the scientific findings of Dr. Leon Hulsey's team? NOTE: I don't really expect an answer so the question is rhetorical. But I find time and again that those who religiously adhere to the official narrative rarely have anything other than "truther" or "conspiracy theorist" to contribute to a serious discussion about 9/11 when the facts contradict the official narrative.
You nailed it.when pesky facts inconvenietely contradict the official conspiracy theory apologists worldview,they always bow out. The people at NIST who were so desperate and grasping at straws over bld 7 since it is the crux of the 9/11 coverup the OCTA's have failed to get around,were so desperatly grasping at straws they came up with the hysterical thermal expansion theory for Bld 7 collapsing ending up with egg on their face in the process. Here is why they ended up with egg on their faces.Barry Jennys testimony of explosives going off in the basement shoots down their bs theory.But it gets even better,here is another one the official conspiracy theory apologists such as NIST NEVER have any answers for. They like to make the absurd claim that thermal expansion caused the fires to collapse Bld 7,yet the SAME pools of molten steel that were burning for several months on end under the towers were under bld 7 as well.so how dis the jet fuel MAGICALLY get over to bld 7 and burn and melt the steel there as well? Oh and it gets even better believe it or not.There were many buildings that were closer to the towers than bld 7 was that had FAR MORE SEVERE FIRES and FAR MORE EXTENSIVE DAMAGE to their building than bld 7 did yet THOSE buildings did NOT collapse and remained standing.so anybody who defends the NIST report that thermal expansion caused the collapse of the fires of bld 7 is obviously a paid shill that has penetrated this forum. If bld 7 collapsed allegedly because of thermal expansion due to fires,then so should those OTHER buildings as well since AGAIN,they were MUCH CLOSER,had FAR MORE EXTENSIVE DAMAGE TO THEM,and had FAR MORE EXTENSIVE FIRES,yet there was no thermal expansion to THOSE buildings to make them collapse? comedy gold. Dont the official conspiracy theory apologists EVER get tired of getting owned by the likes of people like you and me? I feel very sorry for the people who participate in this coverup on the net as people have on this thread.they are going to really regret it in later life when they have to face their karma.when that day comes,they will be horrified by what they have done. Notice that they all bowed out as well when you took them to school in posts # 87,90,99,100,and 101. they have NO ANSWERS for those posts of yours and bowed out when they got cornered by them.hee hee.
