Do You Believe In Racially Profiling Black "People?"

so which sort of "black people" are the worst?

does the shade of their skin matter?

are darker skinned people worse?

should I be more afraid of Dinka than I am of ethiopians?

should I be more worried about the pitjantjara people than the noongars?

is the degree of criminality diluted in people of mixed race?

I'd like to know the answers to these questions.

 

well, I dunno about rednecks (although they can be dangerous in some situations. some of them seem to use "deliverance" as a training video) but in London, I have felt more concerned about the behaviour of drunken teenagers of any race. I never noticed that darker skinned boys were more dangerous or anti social.

maybe in the US its different, but I think thats because there in the bigger cities, race is more often a marker for disadvantage

 

I dunno about that.

I think demonising people on the basis of race is pretty immoral.

unless you are a nazi.

 

lols.

a lot of people are more developed in their understanding of people by their early teens, but I guess you might be whats considered a late bloomer.

 

I believe in moderators profiling threads with inflammatory titles and the members that post them.

 

Ha ha.

 

By percentage of population, blacks are poorer than whites. That is a pretty good explanation for why the crime statistics are the way they are. Now you can still use that as a starting point for racial profiling (the black person out in a white neighborhood) but the mere fact that you can speak so matter-of-factly about a 'white neighborhood" means you are admitting the inherent racism still existing in American society.

The reference to "black crime" (as opposed to just "crime") is another dead giveaway that Efjay is thinking with his racism rather than with his logic. Contrary to popular belief in some circles, most black people are not gang-bangers, pimps, crack whores and thieves and I don't see why the legitmate majority should be harassed on a regular basis by the cops.

 

You know what happens when you jump to conclusions about a black "person" cruising around an all-White neighborhood? He gets a little offended.

You know what happens when you don't suspect a black "person" cruising around an all-White neighborhood is up to no good? People get shot, raped, robbed and murdered.

Innocent peoples lives are far more important than some black "man" getting his feelings a little hurt. They bring racial profiling on themselves.

Oh dear lord... you should be embarrassed of this post. Your lack of understanding and knowledge of racial issues astounds me.

Well, you wouldn't...

Operation Trident sure noticed how dangerous black "boys" in London are.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/oct/11/black-prison-population-increase-england

Well, after seeing some of the wacky things you've come out with on this thread, your opinion on morality is rather meaningless to me. There's nothing immoral about noticing that blacks are destroying civilized society and there's nothing immoral about finding black "peoples" violent behavior worldwide unacceptable.

But seeing as you brought this up. I'd suggest that people who enable blacks to continue their destruction of civilized society and their appalling level of violence against innocent civilians are the ones who are truly immoral.

Says the kid who thinks Chinese people are black... LOL

Your level of ignorance is actually quite disturbing. You seem to be completely unaware of what's occurring in the real world.

 

So why not just put all black people in separate areas they are not allowed to leave, except under constant monitoring? That would cut all black-on-white crime to zero and the white people wouldn't have to have the monkey people anywhere near them. They could be given a special notation on their ID to identify that they are blacks and therefore not to be trusted, and they would have to shop only after white people are done, and only under strict supervision by white security guards. Isn't that a logical extension of your basic argument, Zook?

 

Or, how about we work out a plan and spend all the tax money we waste in foreign aid on peacefully sending black "people" back to Africa where they belong? That way you blacks can do all your killing, raping, inbreeding, child molesting, cannibalism, robbing and drug dealing till your black hearts are content. And no horrible, nasty, evil policemen around to kill your buzz.

Anything's better than the thousands of innocent victims murdered each year in America at the hands of a black "people" who are simply unfit for civilized society.

 

All the babies born in America should be raised and home schooled by Chinese parents. Then they would grow up to be decent people.

 

Well, that's just wrong in that sense...

 

which chinese?

are you saying that the people of Singapore are all chinese?

or that maylasians and Indonesians are all chinese?

or that all Thais are descended from chinese?

all you are doing zook is displaying your ignorance of the peoples of south east asia, who are NOT by any means all Chinese.

 

worked for the nazis ... I'm sure that it would be seen as a suitable solution by someone like zook.

 

I've said nothing about people from South East Asia. You have.

I don't think you're thinking clearly.

Again, I don't think you're thinking clearly. I've already given my solution to that particular immature response.

 

Actually, Zook took my Nazi analogy and ran with it - he then advocated shipping all the blacks back to Africa, much like the Nazi idea of shipping the European Jews to a homeland in Madagascar (why Madagascar?). I wonder if he would take the same logic to the next step as the Nazis did when he found out the Africans didn't want millions of Black Americans dumped in their countries?

 

Actually, many African countries would accept western negroids with open arms...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6818533...lack-americans-returning-africa/#.Twg7PqVhu8B

I also remember Senegal offering to take in the entire population of Haiti after the earthquake. I'm sure that offer wouldn't have made if Estonia suffered a large earthquake, but that's besides the point.

I've never denied thinking all blacks returning to Africa is a great idea. Black "people" are clearly not fit for civilized society.

 

This must really STING!



Get use to it ... WE aren't going Nowhere! As matter of FACT; The Hispanic population is growing also ... and Black People are still making Baby. So you may want to start scoping out a new address ... sport.

 

Your premise is stupid and flawed. You asked if they could do it at Airports, then you change the question when doing it to Blacks. Make up your mind, but don't mix apples and oranges here <<< Mod Edit: Personal Insult (Namecalling) >>> , it isn't becoming.

 

It is hard to take such criticisms seriously from people like you, due to your own obvious biases. It is not as if you criticize everyone equally yourselves.

 

I highly doubt it, but let's see if we can raise the level of discourse in this thread up to acceptable levels.

 

Scorched earth is all you will inherit. Nothing of any value will be left for your people. Nothing but privation and regret.

 

When the OP asked this, I take it they meant 'black', as in of African origin, right, and not Middle Easterners, or Asians etc?

Anway, imo, whenever you start profiling anyone based or race or ethnic group, you take a dangerous path, since you are literally turning them into criminals, before they have done anything wrong.

It never ends with just one group either.

The Nazi's felt the need to profile Jews, based on their very real feelings of the day, that the Jews presented a real threat to them.

Anyone know how that played out?

 

are these people "black?"

 

Papua or Irian Jaya.