Perhaps this documentary is already known to many, but I will post it anyway as it seems there's many others who didn't watch it. [video=youtube;pwfyM0AiXOA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwfyM0AiXOA[/video] The main points of this documentary: 1. The aspect of smoke. Smoke offers many signs of what happens at its source. 2. Overall structure resistance to impacts. 3. Steel resistance vs. different types of fire. Flame characteristics (color, heat etc). 4. Evidence of explosives (including eyewitness statements, expert opinions, seismic data, shape of collapse cloud/ direction of flying debris - slow motion analysis [ton heavy pieces seen flying upwards!], heavy segments of rubble flown abnormally far away and tiny fragments of human bones discovered in 2006 on the rooftops around - officially reported in the press). South Tower collapse explosion makes windows in the other tower shatter! - footage evidence from inside the North Tower, with sound, recorded by the fire department. Accounts of heavy explosions in the basements. Footage of cracks and deformations from the underground of Manhattan. 5. Characteristics of building collapses & demolitions. Expected behaviors of concrete. Resulting rubble. Rubble abnormalities (too much powder, some large beams bent without cracks while others are neatly sliced, repetitive size patterns in all columns recovered from the site). 6. Inconsistencies/contradictions in official reports. 7. Unusual activity in the Towers just the weeks before (the first power down in WTC history, teams of unknown workers 'upgrading internet cables' during the powerdown, people denied access to floors in broad daylight, tenants unexpectedly and 'temporarily' moved to other floors, renovation like-activity, pick hammer sounds, office workers hearing drilling machines digging into walls during daylight while at work, dust like in construction sites had to be cleaned from corridors and lobbies every morning). Enjoy
thats one of several great documentarys that expose the lies of the government that 19 muslims were behind 9/11.the paid shills here that defends the government version of events to no end,never have any answers for the facts in that video.
Well 8.04 presents the first distortion. They did not consider the fuel load of a prospective impact because the assumption was the aircraft would be on approach to a nearby airport and probably lost. Why did they think this. In 1945 a US bomber hit the Empire State building while lost in fog. It was the reason the specific flights to hijack where chosen because they would be carrying maximum fuel loads very early in their flights
now you are calling the buildings designers liars LOL this gets better all the time! I get a kick out of the way these guys "manufacture" what they think the thought process was of others when they cant even balance a check book much less design the wtc.
there is more than just one kind of smoke. you have the black smoke from the office materials, then you also have pure white smoke! so it went from black smoke to white smoke. (thermetic material) its the white smoke they ignore
Indeed. Most of the time black smoke is indicative of an oxygen starved relatively cool fire. White smoke is indicative of an oxygen rich hotter fire.
it might exist under very specific conditions however I have never seen white smoke from a naturally aspirated hydrocarbon fire. On the other hand, thermetics; yeh they have brilliantly white flames and white smoke that fades to a white gray. while the hydocarbon fires were choking and being put out by the sprinklers the thermetics were going strong!
That's a good video. This one has the latest analyses and it's very comprehensive. "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Full version http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GCeuSr3Mk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7mDXHn_byA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DegLpgJmFL8 I recommend it to people who are new to the issue. This documentary explains the motives. http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/new-american-century/ There being an international tribunal on this lends a lot of legitimacy to the idea that the US government did it. http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_wa...es-tribunal-with-alfred-lambremont-webre.html There being a large group of architects and engineers who believe it was an inside job also lends a lot of credibility to the idea that the government did it. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=architects+and+engineers+for+911+truth&sm=1 Those are all documentaries so I don't think this post goes off-topic.
I posted it because some people's latest news is from 2001. It might be old but it's a good start for them. In everything you do you start with the classics, right?
I have no problem whatsoever with your posting it. But if you had said what it was then people who already know about it would not need to waste time loading it to find out they have already seen it. psik
No it is not dumb. What is dumb is claiming it is dumb. A simple experiment proves dj lunacy wrong. With an acetylene torch one can adjust the ratio of oxygen to acetylene. Do this experiment for yourself. Turn the acetylene up high and the oxygen down low. You'll get black smoke. Turn the oxygen up on high and you'll get white smoke. Oxygen starved fires produce black smoke and oxygen rich fires produce white smoke. Ask any welder.
9/11mysteriesguide.com Debunked a long time ago. I extremely adore the clunkity-clunk theory, makes me giggle.
Why ask a welder? Let's ask firemen. www.fireengineering.com/articles/pr...YQFjAH&usg=AFQjCNE9dL9xwqJnQtZ3SyyFPrqCFOxZXw Pay especially close attention to the parts where volume, flow, density, and COLOR are discussed. You will see how ridiculous you sound and how wrong you are. From the article Black Fire Black fire is a good phrase to describe smoke that is high-volume, turbulent velocity, ultradense, and black. Black fire is a sure sign of impending autoignition and flashover. In actuality, the phrase black fire is accurate-the smoke itself is doing all the destruction that flames would cause-charring, heat damage to steel, content destruction, and victim death. Black fire can reach temperatures of more than 1,000°F! Treat black fire just as actual flames-vent and cool. Any other silly stuff you wish to post? Ask a welder, that is your problem. You ask the wrong people for information, I mean, the plumbers I worked around used acetylene torches when they were running copper, why not ask them. Please just stop with the nonsense, you aren't doing yourself any favors. The article linked shows you to be wrong in every facet of your claim.
nothing like shooting yourself in the foot. so it burns much cooler than office materials or fuel. LOL - - - Updated - - - totally shot himself in the foot!
Oh, it was read, your ignorant post shows just how wrong you still are. But by all means keep going to welders to discuss matters of fire. What next, you want to talk to concrete guys about roofing?
