DOE agrees 9-11 was a Nuclear Event

Discussion in '9/11' started by John T, Jan 22, 2015.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,721
    Likes Received:
    3,943
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because when a person is run over by a car you do not test for knife wounds.

    If is proven what brought down the buildings and no evidence of any kind even SUGGESTS explosives.
     
  2. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    12,220
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All the evidence says explosions. Dozens of witnesses reported explosions. The gazillion pictures available show explosions. Debris was ejected laterally because of explosions.
     
  3. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,721
    Likes Received:
    3,943
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No evidence of any kind supports an idea of explosives.

    No pictures show explosions and a few witnesses mean nothing.
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No,no,no and finally no
    NO evidence says explosions

    Witnesses say they HEARD what sounded like explosions,but as heard in the 1999's big blue crane collapse in Milwaukee,things can SOUND like explosions,and not be explosions.

    NONE of the pictures taken show explosions.....NONE

    And the debris was ejected that way because of the force of the collapse
     
  5. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,960
    Likes Received:
    1,908
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the problem is not that there is no evidence both watching the building and the iron, the problem is that there is no one who supports the official story knows enough about the subject to recognize if explosives were used.

    thats the real problem.
     
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,721
    Likes Received:
    3,943
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is all false.

    Every one with expertise in those areas knows there is no evidence of explosives and what instead actually caused the collapse.

    The so called official story is proven by evidence.

    Twoofer theories have zero evidence of any sort
     
  7. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,579
    Likes Received:
    12,220
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And the fact that because proper forensic procedures were not followed and the crime scene was not preserved, no good accounting could be made.

    They got rid of the evidence on purpose.
     
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bull****
     
  9. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male

    I swear they just make it up as they go along. :roll:
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sometimes it's like arguing with a drunk college student...
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,960
    Likes Received:
    1,908
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well official story supporters who now days are invariably nothing more than propaganda pushing posers have made themselves into the laughing stock of the country. Only posers would claim there were no explosives then prove it by not testing for them. I mean that is some seriously laughable twisted logic that we have seen from those people.
     
  12. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't think there was a cover-up.
     

Share This Page