Another surprising declaration, that we should all keep up with since this is yet another mishap that will come and haunt the US Administration. Deputy Prime Minister of Israel is not a person that will utter nonsense... If this is true the US will have to answer for what has happened to Mubarak of Egypt and its bombing Libya then withdrawing... All the bowing to Arab Tyrants has soured relations and credibility. HB DPM Dan Meridor: Obama gave carte blanche to Assad to slaughter his people Dan Meridor: Obama gave carte blanche to Assad to slaughter his people Dr. Aaron Lerner Date: 27 April 2011 Speaking in a live interview on the "London and Kirshenbaum" program Israel Television Channel 10 this afternoon Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor charged President Obama with giving Syrian President Assad “carte blanche to slaughter his people”. Meridor also noted that while he did not prefer it, one of the real options for Israel is to annex the West Bank and give citizenship rights. Dr. Aaron Lerner, Director IMRA (Independent Media Review & Analysis)
As long as the regime has military and police forces at its disposal, it will not attempt to drag Israel into battle because Israel is liable to strike hard, in particular disabling its helicopters and preventing it from operating against the masses. Nevertheless, in the event of a total collapse of the governmental apparatus, someone in the Syrian regime might think along the lines of Let me die with the Israelis and launch nasty weapons in Israel's direction. In such a case, it will be difficult for Israel to respond effectively for there will be no one to deter and punish. Israel must be prepared for such a scenario, and especially keep its eyes and ears open in light of the weapons of mass destruction in Syrian hands. Prof. Mordechai Kedar: Possible Scenarios for Syria's Future Center for the Study of the Middle East and Islam (under formation) Bar-Ilan University Middle Eastern Insights No. 7, 29 April, 2011 To the Last Syrian Mordechai Kedar The sights and sounds emanating from Syria indicate that the sides, both the regime and its opponents, have reached a stage in which they feel desperate and will not waive their demands, regardless of the price to be paid. From the publics perspective, the threshold of demands rises as more time passes and casualties grow: if, when the protests began, they called for repeal of the emergency law, they now see the regime as the enemy of the people and insist upon its downfall. Knocking down statues of Assad father and son and tearing down their portraits has become routine, and the masses do this with obvious enthusiasm. The turbulent bloodbath is becoming more complex: the one hundred murdered today are the one hundred funerals of tomorrow, each a protest in which more will be killed, and similarly thereafter, with emotions becoming increasingly heated as regime violence intensifies. Fear is dissipating on both sides: the people are no longer afraid to mass in the streets and in contrast the authorities are no longer reluctant to concentrate massive fire at the crowds. The breaches in the ranks of the regime are becoming more widespread: The Mufti of Syria resigned three weeks ago; members of Parliament quit during a live broadcast on Al-Jazeera last week; the editor of a major newspaper was sacked after sharply criticizing the government; senior officers are shedding their uniforms in a sign of protest; soldiers are deserting the army and taking their personal weapons with them; prominent public personalities are openly expressing disapproval of the conduct of the security forces, which received a green light to open fire at demonstrators. As the circle of Bashars supporters becomes smaller, their siege mentality and cruelty will increase. They no longer fight for the regime but to keep their heads from rolling. The blood of the protesters will be washed away by that of the regimes fighters, if they are caught in uniform. The loyalists are prepared to fight to the last Syrian. The city of Hama is the symbol of the 1982 uprising of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was crushed with much cruelty and the murder of thousands. The dispatch of troops to Dara at the beginning of last week points to the possibility that it will serve as the symbol of the 2011 uprising. The question is how many more thousands have to be killed in Syria before the world begins to take action as in Libya. To the government of Israel I would propose parachuting medicines into Syrian cities using unmanned drones. This would be an excellent investment for the future. Possible Scenarios for Syrias Future A. Preservation of the Syrian State Under New Leadership It is possible that at some point a responsible adult high in the ranks of the Syrian army or the head of an intelligence agency will understand that it is worth throwing the public a bone in order to salvage as much as possible. With the assistance of several armed bodyguards, he will arrest Bashar Assad along with his brother Maher and other relatives, primarily from the Makhlouf family, that of the presidents mother. He will conduct a hasty trial and treat them as the public expects them to be treated, in order to attain calm. He will announce constitutional changes and economic reforms and schedule elections for several months later. This scenario is somewhat similar to the current situation in Egypt. If this responsible adult is an Alawi, it is safe to assume that the public will not accept him and will continue its protests. If he is a Sunni, there is a greater chance that some people will wait and see how things develop, especially if he will not be identified with economic corruption and the bloodshed that took place during the crackdown on the protests. The important point in this scenario is that the government machinery survives and continues to function and administer the state; in the coming years, this machinery will undergo change and those who were part of the previous regime will gradually be replaced. If the pace of reforms does not satisfy the masses, they will return to the streets, oppose the authorities and prevent the ruler from establishing himself while he pushes the public and its wishes to the sidelines. The masses sense their power and will not cede their accomplishments, particularly after sacrificing so many on the altar of freedom. B. Regime Split The government will split if and when conflicts erupt within the security forces the army and the intelligence with some switching their loyalty from the regime to the street, similar to what transpired in Libya and Yemen. If things develop as they did in Libya, an all out, no-holds-barred war will commence between those in the army who support the rebels and those who support the regime. If developments follow the Yemenite pattern, the army will be paralyzed by its divided loyalties. A potential Syrian parallel could divide the state into two parts reflecting the geographic division of the forces which develop, with a possible war between the two sides similar to that in Libya. This scenario will create an unstable situation since each side will continue to be ruled by a military elite and Syrias fundamental problems will remain unsolved and will, indeed, worsen. The regime will be supported by Iran and the western world will back the rebels. C. The Collapse of the State If the Alawis lose the battle for the Syrian street and their control of the government, the worst will transpire for them; frenzied Sunni masses will descend on Alawi neighborhoods in Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo, armed with knives, ready to detach Alawi heads from their necks. All Muslims in Syria know that Alawis are infidels and idol-worshippers and, as such, are condemned to death. The Alawis will flee to the Ansayriyyah Mountains, their ancestral homeland in western Syria, and, entrenched there, will defend their lives. The Kurds in the North will declare independence as did their brethren in Iraq; the Druze in Jabal al-Druze in the South will restore the autonomy stolen from them by France in 1925; the Bedouins in the East will establish a state with Dir a-Zur as its capital; the Aleppans will exploit the opportunity to throw off the yoke of the hated Damascenes. Thus, six states will rise from the ruins of Syria, each much more homogeneous than the former united Syria and, therefore, more legitimate in the eyes of most of its inhabitants. This is similar to what transpired in Yugoslavia. These six states will not require an outside enemy in the form of Israel, whose permanent role had been to unite the people under the president's banner; there is, therefore, a greater possibility than ever before that peace will reign between the state that is founded on the other side of the Golan (the State of Damascus?) and Israel. As these states are unlikely to maintain warm relations with Iran, the world can bless this development, which will break the axis of evil and further isolate Iran. Hezbollah in Lebanon will also feel less secure without the permanent Syrian backing it has enjoyed to date. Heating Up the Border with Israel Until the 1970s, whenever the Syrian regime faced internal problems, it heated up the border with Israel in order to create the opportunity to tell the enraged masses: The Zionist Huns are poised to destroy us and, you, therefore, must put aside all conflicts and unite under the aegis of the savior, the president. This practice has been neglected for thirty-seven years and it is hard to believe that it will be resumed because the public no longer buys the story. As long as the regime has military and police forces at its disposal, it will not attempt to drag Israel into battle because Israel is liable to strike hard, in particular disabling its helicopters and preventing it from operating against the masses. Nevertheless, in the event of a total collapse of the governmental apparatus, someone in the Syrian regime might think along the lines of Let me die with the Israelis and launch nasty weapons in Israel's direction. In such a case, it will be difficult for Israel to respond effectively for there will be no one to deter and punish. Israel must be prepared for such a scenario, and especially keep its eyes and ears open in light of the weapons of mass destruction in Syrian hands. -------------------------------------------- IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis Website: www.imra.org.il
Meridor also noted that while he did not prefer it, one of the real options for Israel is to annex the West Bank and give citizenship rights.
Russia doesn't want to be drawn into a mid-east war since they have an alliance pact with Syria and Iran... Why Russia is so opposed to asking Assad to go February 1, 2012 - Russia is taking a hard line against a UN resolution asking Syrian President Assad to step down, saying the possibility of military intervention must first be ruled out. See also: Free Syrian Army: Better tool for toppling Syria's Assad than UN? January 30, 2012 - As Arab and European nations push for a new resolution at the UN Security Council tomorrow, the Free Syrian Army is emerging as an increasingly influential player. But it needs weapons, money.
Granny says, "Dat's right - dey only backed him when he was useful to `em... Russia says it won't host Assad but others welcome Dec 22,`12 -- Russia's foreign minister says Moscow would welcome any country's offer of a safe haven to Syrian President Bashar Assad, but underlined that Moscow itself has no intention of giving him shelter if he steps down. See also: Russia welcomes any offer to give Assad refuge December 22, 2012 Russia would welcome any country's offer of safe haven for Syrian President Bashar Assad, but has no plans to make one of its own, Moscow's foreign minister said in the latest comments to suggest a growing distance between the two allies.
Looks like Obama is resigned to Assad stayin' in power... US Sees Assad Staying in Syria Until March 2017 Jan 06, 2016 | WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's best-case scenario for political transition in Syria does not foresee Bashar Assad stepping down as the country's leader before March 2017, outlasting Barack Obama's presidency by at least two months, according to a document obtained by The Associated Press. See also: US-led Coalition: ISIS has Lost 30 Percent of its Territory Jan 05, 2016 | The U.S.-led coalition fighting the Islamic State group said Tuesday that the militants have lost 30 percent of the territory they once held in Iraq and Syria. Related: Iran-Saudi Rift Complicates U.S. Campaign Against ISIS Jan 05, 2016 | The U.S. military braced Monday for possible fallout from the Iran-Saudi Arabia rift on the campaign against the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq.
