Essene Origins -- Palestine or Babylonia ??

Discussion in 'Religion & Philosophy' started by Margot, Dec 27, 2011.

  1. Margot

    Margot Account closed, not banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    62,072
    Likes Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    For those interested in Bible history or Ancient history of Palestine.

    The Damascus Document is a collection of rules and instructions reflecting the practices of a sectarian community. It includes two elements. The first is an admonition that implores the congregation to remain faithful to the covenant of those who retreated from Judea to the "Land of Damascus."

    The second lists statutes dealing with vows and oaths, the tribunal, witnesses and judges, purification of water, Sabbath laws, and ritual cleanliness. The right-hand margin is incomplete. The left-hand margin was sewn to another piece of parchment, as evidenced by the remaining stitches.

    In 1896, noted Talmud scholar and educator Solomon Schechter discovered sectarian compositions which later were found to be medieval versions of the Damascus Document.

    Schechter's find in a synagogue storeroom near Cairo, almost fifty years before the Qumran discoveries, may be regarded as the true starting point of modern scroll research.


    http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/scrolls/scr4.html#damasc

    Essene Origins -- Palestine or Babylonia

    Excerpts and Definitions and Addendums:

    Scholars have proposed two basic theories concerning the origins of the people who wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls. One theory suggests that the Essenes originated in Palestine -- the other in [Neo]-Babylonia. The Damascus Document figures prominently in the formulation of both theories.

    In the Palestine-origin theory the Essene movement was a reaction against the Hellenization of Palestinian Judaism. This process of Hellenization began almost imperceptibly in the third century B.C. In the first part of the second century B.C. however the forces of Hellenization gained new ground both culturally and politically. Then in 172 B.C. Onias III -- the legitimate High Priest -- was murdered in Jerusalem: Onias was a Zadokite or a priest who was descended from Zadok (the high priest of King David and and originator of the line of High Priests of the Temple in Jerusalem).

    Instead of Onias the Syrian overlords appointed Meneleus -- a highly Hellenized Jew who was not of the Zadokite line. To many of the faithful Meneleus could only be a usurper ...

    Matters were made still worse by the increasingly forced Hellenization and religious oppression of the Syrian overlord King Antiochus IV. In 165 B.C. Judea finally revolted.

    Under the brilliant military leadership of Judas Maccabeus the revolt was successful and an independent Jewish state was once again established. Thus began the Hasmonean [Dynasty] of Jewish kings -- first Judas himself (165-160) -- then his brother Jonathan (160-143) and lastly his brother Simon (143-134) ...

    As matters turned out the Hasmoneans brought not a return to orthodoxy but increased Hellenization.

    Even Judas himself signed a treaty of friendship with the Roman Senate and employed partly Hellenized Jews as his ambassadors. Finally in 152 B.C. Jonathan had himself appointed High Priest -- another usurpation; for many Jews this act was a great provocation and the strongest reason for abhorring the Hasmoneans ...

    According to the Palestinian theory of Essene origins it was in this atmosphere that the Essene movement began. [Those] Jews (1)disgusted with what they believed to be the pollution of their ancestral religion and (2)revolted by the usurpation of the High Priesthood by a non-Zadokite rallied behind a man they called Moreh Tzedek (Teacher of Righteousness). No doubt he was of the Zadokite line and a legitimate claimant to the title of High Priest ...

    The faithful retreated to the desert to (1)live a life of ritual purity (2)observe the ancient law (3)follow the old calendar that marked the holy times and (4)await the day when the Teacher of Righteousness would be accepted by all Jews as High Priest and would [thence] return once again to Jerusalem. This is the Palestinian theory of Essene origins ...

    The Babylonian theory of Essene origins traces the beginning of this strange sect to Jews in Babylonia who had been deported there after the destruction of the First Temple in 586 B.C. Many of these Jews -- deported from their Judean homeland -- perceived the Babylonian Exile as divine punishment. Some of this group -- whom we may call Essenes -- [were] returned to Palestine [Cyrus Edict 538 BC] at what they must have regarded as a propitious moment -- the victory of Judas Maccabeus and the renewal of an independent Jewish state.

    Once arrived there however they were bitterly disappointed by the Hellenized forms of Judaism that controlled the state. After an initial attempt to bring their erring brethren to the truth they retreated to the isolation of Qumran -- near the northern end of the Dead Sea. Led by Moreh Tzedek the Essenes believed that adherance to their precepts was the one sure refuge against the coming messianic judgement ...

    Much of the support of this Babylonian-origin theory comes from the Damascus Document -- especially its historical allusions. The document (1)alludes to leaving the land of Judah and going to the land of the north (Damascus) and that (2)the Essene movement had been in existence long before the Teacher of Righteousness had appeared on the scene.

    The conclusion arrived at in this theory is that the Damascus Document was originally written by Jews living in the Diaspora -- in this case the Babylonian Exile ...


    http://ancientneareast.tripod.com/Table_Contents.html
     

Share This Page