Ex-White House stenographer says FBI ignored Biden’s role in son Hunter’s business dealings

https://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/26/nyregion/stenographer-investigated-in-leaks-to-the-mob.html

https://freedom.press/news/crowd-fu...-passes-to-the-bradley-manning-court-martial/

https://www.businessinsider.com/for...apher-says-trump-avoids-being-recorded-2018-7

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/03/new-york-stenographer-chaos

Thrre are more. You can Google it for yourself.

 

Ignoring it is the best way to avoid it. If you don’t investigate it, you can’t find any wrong doing. This is the Dems playbook lately.

 

Sorry I missed the gender pronoun.

 

Everyone knows how propaganda works. Mix in some truth with the lies. We are being told some of the documents released are true but not all. Sounds like propaganda to me.

 

How many WHITE HOUSE stenographers have been caught leaking things out of context? You seem to be asserting that all stenographers do so therefore this is a false story.

 

Then why are you trying to inject such doubt as probable or even likely. When such stenographers are used in the WH I understand there are multiple and they all cross checked their notes are you saying that the WH stenographer corps is involved in some leaks to try and harm Biden?

 

Did I use one?

 

I said nothing of the sort. My point is that it does occur, and isn't uncommon. Reading comprehension, please.

Do you believe that White House stenographers are too good to leak information? Are they not just as human as any other stenographers?

 

I'm saying it's possible. Period.

 

How probable? It's also possible he is 100% accurate and if fact more probable do you agree to that too?

 

How common is it for WH stenographers to leak things out of context? Yes they are not stupid and know other stenographers are also recording the conversations.

 

So I eagerly await your next post chiding and claiming the same of Trump getting his daughters Chinese trademarks then also right ? He literally did that in your face, and your focused on Hunters compromised laptop……

 

Don't forget she got trademarks in China for voting machines. Imagine the pressure if Hunter had trademarks on voting machines.

 

AND, under oath!!!

 

Still trying to make sense of why she needed those Chinese trademarks and Patents on VOTING MACHINES.......serious red flag when this was first reported many years back when he Dad was in office.

 

That's true. What's more surprising is the party that whined about voting machines has no problem with an official having a financial interest in voting machines. They were more concerned about Hugo Chavez changing votes from the grave.

 

Well, Hugo is a shape shifting time traveller.

 

Sure, he could be. My point, as I thought I clearly stated, is that it's possible that he's lying. You used the word probable, not I.

 

Multiple stenographers? Got a link? Were there others in the room with this guy? Have they corroborated his story?

 

No I'm not going to research a common procedure in the WH which was also fully covered in the Trump impeachment and the phone call transcript because such calls are not recorded on tape, they are TRANSCRIBED by these stenographers and they work in teams to make sure the transcripts are accurate. Go look it up yourself.

 

Yes the more salient to the discussion word. ANYTHING is possible but what is the more PROBABLE? I await your answer.

 

How the eff would I, or you, or anyone know?

You're fishing for me to say something you can attack. That isn't debate, it's rancorous argument for no good purpose.

 

Well if you don't even know if it is probable why merely say it is possible which lacks any merit since anything is possible.

He's asking to testify under oath does that make it more or less probable he wants to leak false out of context information.

 

The person responsible for documenting exactly what is said and recording it?

Yes. Absolutely. I want to hear what they know.

 

I guess next they will say we can't trust all those court transcripts that the court stenographers do because it is "possible" they falsify them or change the context.