Let's first note that you are conveniently moving the goal posts here. This thread has nothing to do with WTC7. So if you are conceding that WTC1 and 2 came down without a controlled demolition and want to talk instead about WTC7, then the significantly smaller event of the WTC7 collapse actually becomes almost unworthy of mention. On the other hand, if you are able to come back on track and talk about WTC 1&2, I repeat: anyone with any experience with the military style explosives used in controlled demolitions knows that the truther assertions are impossible. As to your pointless video, it "proves" nothing other than a superficial resemblance between the WTC7 collapse on one hand and a controlled demolition on the other. Superficially a dolphin also resembles a fish. But guess what? A dolphin is not a fish. A more careful look at the collapse and its aftermath demonstrates beyond any possible contradiction that no explosives were involved in WTC7 either. The accusation of "liar, liar" is always the ultimate fallback position of any nutburger, be they truther, birther, creationist... it does not matter. Of course, calling names without any actual substantive argument is merely a dual indictment on your reasoning and your maturity. It's unfortunately not a response to any actual argument. It is instead merely the pathetic whine of a rhetorical loser. - - - Updated - - - That has got to be simply the most breathtakingly idiotic post in any truther thread today.
No. It means the resistive strength of steel is much greater than the resistive strength of cardboard. - - - Updated - - - I haven't accused you of it. I've factually proven it.
Which would be meaningful if Gage had dropped structural steel and concrete on his cardboard box. But he didn't, so it's not. You haven't come within light years of demonstrating that anything I've written was wrong, let alone that I am a liar. I've noticed that calling other people a liar is your default mode. So I really can't take it seriously.
he is trying to explain engineering principles to ignoramuses and retards. when was the last time you or anyone here lectured at Cambridge University? [video=youtube;SJEUR7wX8Eg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJEUR7wX8Eg[/video] [video=youtube;LZegD4OmfCQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZegD4OmfCQ[/video]
only retards and ignoramuses compare 110 story steel structures to cardboard boxes. Dicky Gage has been exposed as an idiot and a loser. The AIA should strip him of his license, due to his idiocy. He is an embarrassment to Architects everywhere.
Actually, yes it does matter. The failure to account for different materials as well as scale renders the demonstration completely false. - - - Updated - - - Why? Because that is the pool from which he wishes to recruit? Because as we have seen in this thread, using cardboard boxes to explain engineering principles to smart people has proved to be a total fail.
even after bringing it down to the level that ***** should be able to understand they still dont get it. proof is they still think it was a natural collapse from fire and a broken column. he deserves highest honors for his attempt to pull off a miracle. such lack of appreciation for such a monumental undertaking. Do you understand what he is trying to say?
Since what he is trying to explain is not true, there is no honest demonstration that is possible. When the concept you are trying to demonstrate is bogus, only a bogus demonstration can serve that purpose. And that is exactly what he has provided.
Any bleeding **** can grasp that, had he set something on the same scale as the lower block on top of the upper, it would have to have crushed that. Being cardboard, it would not have. In no way does any cardboard box resemble a steel sky scraper and Little Dickie should know that, which makes him either a liar or an idiot.