"Expert" Truther compares skyscrapers...to cardboard boxes

Discussion in '9/11' started by Ronstar, Nov 28, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    [​IMG]

    Doesn't mean they possess the same material properties.
     
  2. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Let's first note that you are conveniently moving the goal posts here. This thread has nothing to do with WTC7. So if you are conceding that WTC1 and 2 came down without a controlled demolition and want to talk instead about WTC7, then the significantly smaller event of the WTC7 collapse actually becomes almost unworthy of mention.

    On the other hand, if you are able to come back on track and talk about WTC 1&2, I repeat: anyone with any experience with the military style explosives used in controlled demolitions knows that the truther assertions are impossible.

    As to your pointless video, it "proves" nothing other than a superficial resemblance between the WTC7 collapse on one hand and a controlled demolition on the other.

    Superficially a dolphin also resembles a fish. But guess what? A dolphin is not a fish.

    A more careful look at the collapse and its aftermath demonstrates beyond any possible contradiction that no explosives were involved in WTC7 either.

    The accusation of "liar, liar" is always the ultimate fallback position of any nutburger, be they truther, birther, creationist... it does not matter. Of course, calling names without any actual substantive argument is merely a dual indictment on your reasoning and your maturity.

    It's unfortunately not a response to any actual argument. It is instead merely the pathetic whine of a rhetorical loser.

    - - - Updated - - -

    That has got to be simply the most breathtakingly idiotic post in any truther thread today.
     
  3. Quantumhead

    Quantumhead New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2013
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No. It means the resistive strength of steel is much greater than the resistive strength of cardboard.

    - - - Updated - - -

    I haven't accused you of it. I've factually proven it.
     
  4. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Which would be meaningful if Gage had dropped structural steel and concrete on his cardboard box. But he didn't, so it's not.

    You haven't come within light years of demonstrating that anything I've written was wrong, let alone that I am a liar. I've noticed that calling other people a liar is your default mode. So I really can't take it seriously.
     
  5. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is why I refer to that stupid little punk as ''Little Dickie."
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,792
    Trophy Points:
    113
    he is trying to explain engineering principles to ignoramuses and retards.

    when was the last time you or anyone here lectured at Cambridge University?

    [video=youtube;SJEUR7wX8Eg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJEUR7wX8Eg[/video]

    [video=youtube;LZegD4OmfCQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZegD4OmfCQ[/video]
     
  7. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,462
    Likes Received:
    14,676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    only retards and ignoramuses compare 110 story steel structures to cardboard boxes.

    Dicky Gage has been exposed as an idiot and a loser.

    The AIA should strip him of his license, due to his idiocy. He is an embarrassment to Architects everywhere.
     
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,792
    Trophy Points:
    113
    not required for the purposes of the specific point being conveyed.
     
  9. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually, yes it does matter. The failure to account for different materials as well as scale renders the demonstration completely false.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Why? Because that is the pool from which he wishes to recruit?

    Because as we have seen in this thread, using cardboard boxes to explain engineering principles to smart people has proved to be a total fail.
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,792
    Trophy Points:
    113
    even after bringing it down to the level that ***** should be able to understand they still dont get it. proof is they still think it was a natural collapse from fire and a broken column. he deserves highest honors for his attempt to pull off a miracle.

    such lack of appreciation for such a monumental undertaking.

    Do you understand what he is trying to say?
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,792
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well then show us how he should have explained it
     
  12. Perilica grad Ameriku

    Perilica grad Ameriku Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Since what he is trying to explain is not true, there is no honest demonstration that is possible. When the concept you are trying to demonstrate is bogus, only a bogus demonstration can serve that purpose.

    And that is exactly what he has provided.
     
  13. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Any bleeding **** can grasp that, had he set something on the same scale as the lower block on top of the upper, it would have to have crushed that. Being cardboard, it would not have.

    In no way does any cardboard box resemble a steel sky scraper and Little Dickie should know that, which makes him either a liar or an idiot.
     
  14. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, he is saying that he thinks we are all retards who will buy his nutjobbery wholesale.
     
  15. ringotuna

    ringotuna Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2013
    Messages:
    2,502
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Klunkity Klunk...LMAO. That's soooo sciency.
     
  16. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    that is the sound that Sophia's head makes when the walks.
     
  17. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,462
    Likes Received:
    14,676
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I still love this video. :)
     

Share This Page