If you can't trust LEO who can we trust. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/08/04/fbi-informant-crimes-report/2613305/ I can understand overlooking victimless crimes but according to this they are ignoring a lot more than that.
Turning the other way when informants commit crimes is a common practice - at least according to both hollywood and the DOJ. that there doesn't seem to by any concern that the crime fighters are tacitly endorsing crime by criminals they are in intimate contact with is astonishing. could it be that these are seen as merely ethical trade-offs? Is there no corrupting influence here, for instance when a couple of $80k/yr agents let their "informant" skim a big chunk of cash from some drug deal or other illegal act? Nah, the FBI is way to upstanding for corruption. I mean look at their investigation of FBI shooting incidents. Every single one of the 200 plus investigations came to the same conclusion - righteous kill. that kind of infallibility makes any concern foolish and paranoid.
Uncle Ferd says dey gonna fry him inna `lectric chair till he sizzles an' his eyes pop out... Whitey Bulger jury mulls Boston mob trial verdict Fri, Aug 09, 2013 - LEGAL LIABILITIES: The judge told jurors they had to be unanimous to find Bulger guilty of any act in the 32 criminal counts he faces, including 19 murders
James 'Whitey Bulger Guilty... High life brought low: Jury finds 'Whitey' Bulger guilty in killings, racketeering Mon August 12, 2013 > Bulger was arrested in 2011 in Santa Monica, California, after some 16 years on the lam; He ran Boston's Irish mob from the 1970s through the early 1990s; A jury finds Bulger responsible for the murder of 11 people, guilty of racketeering; He could spend the rest of his life behind bars; Sentencing is set for November