Due process only occurs after confiscation (enlighten me how this is considered due process when the hearing is held ex parte to have your firearms removed?) and anyone can file a petition without recourse to get a person, in most states with Red Flag laws, weapons seized.
FBI Agents Blast Trump-Inspired Calls For Violence Against Law Enforcement "This is not a partisan or political issue. It is a matter of public safety and basic decency,” said a statement by FBI Agents Association President Brian O’Hare. www.huffpost.com/entry/fbi-agents-associ...
Very disingenuous of you as I never stated that. You are putting words into my mouth. I am for scrupulous red flag laws as I do think they are warranted at times. I think that any petition hearing should involve the accused and actual due process should take place (never ex parte) with the ability to defend themselves and any person that is proven to have falsely petitioned to have a persons 2nd amendment rights stripped should be held legally accountable. I think any reasonable person should find this 100% reasonable.
yea, waiting for a hearing and giving the person time to explain why the should get to keep the firearm defeats the purpose of a red flag law. So you are against the concept of red flag laws.
They already have a majority in both, and gun confiscation hasn't been mentioned. You worry too much. Democrats own guns, too.
Again, disingenuous! I'm against stripping individuals of their constitutional rights without proper due process, depriving them the ability to defend themselves in court, violating their second amendment, their 4th amendment, their 5th amendment and their 6th amendment. As I stated many times here, the left truly cares not for our constitution and is willing to strip individuals of their individual rights on a mere petition without proper due process. Circling back, the left is looking to confiscate your guns.. You've literally just proven it in our exchange.
Is that supposed to change my mind because your Orange man bad said it? He is as wrong as anyone that chose to deprive individuals of their constitutional rights.
yes, i am for someone who is mentally unstable having their 2nd amendment rights taken away, even if they haven't committed a crime yet. You oppose red flag laws.
how is it proven they are mentally unstable? By a mean tweet? Political ideology? Mere thought crime? You oppose lawful individuals constitutional rights.
I only oppose your unconstitutional red flag laws. I support rational red flag laws that keeps the integrity of lawful individuals constitutional rights.
No one is coming for your guns. This is like saying they are coming for your cars because of new rules and regulations to make the roads safer, you know the freedom of travel, with those new driving requirements.