Let's see what Grassley discovers. He's investigating, and he'll make a recommendation to Sessions based on what he uncovers.
Bill was getting $500,000 speaking engagements from the Russians during this period when his wife was SoS. Seems these fees have dried up since she lost the Presidency, costing the Clinton's millions of dollars. Not surprising she doesn't want to let it go. I doubt they were fees as much as they were bribes. http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/politics/hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-paid-speeches/index.html
RECORDED CONVERSATIONS. Ooops...gonna be tough to dance away from this...but we know you'll try your darnedest....
Let's wait and see....Mueller is on the hook for this , too...it was under his watch at FBI that the coverup occurred...
When asked by committee if Steele received payment, Comey declined to answer. Committee then subpoenaed 2 FBI agents who would have the information Comey declined to provide, but those agents refused to testify citing Muellers investigation might be compromised. That whole premise is ridiculous, and that's 3 FBI agents who all refuse to say NO. we didn't pay Steele.
and that is the question that demands an answer is why weren't the members of the committee notified? purpose of the committee is to vet the purchaser and many members of the committee would be privy to that information so either the are woefully and completely incompetent or just didn't care and approved the sale to criminals anyways which screams corruption
has been explained before Clinton has access to that money donated in the forum of being reimbursement for travel, lodging, food, entertainment, almost anything by the foundation as long as she claims she doing it on behalf of the foundation It doesn't make a dam if they can or cannot export the uranium they are in control of it there for the US isn't in control of it
I've been saying for months that Mueller will either a witness, or a co-defendant ... Mueller headed the FBI when Manafort was surveilled in 2008 ... presumably FISA was in play. Mueller headed the FBI when Page was surveilled 2012 ... presumably FISA was in play. Circa.com releases the NSA's "self reported" FISA abuses that coincide with both Manafort & Pages surveillance. Now add Uranium 1 ... how does Mueller avoid becoming either a witness, or a co-defendant? It's inevitable.
Yes. Those "routine audits" revealed that the principle investors in the Uranium 1 scheme pumped $145 million into Clintons charities during the span, and immediately after the Uranium 1 deal was hatched. Another "routine audit" will reveal that not one of those principles has donated $1 dollar since ...
Is that true? Well....that's odd considering how Russians couldn't pour money fast enough into Clinton Foundation charities when the Uranium One deal was pending Clinton's approval I guess those oligarchs and Russian interests at Rosatom just suddenly lost interest in helping other people throughout the world via the Clintons. I'm sure they all have good reason.