Finland : 93 % of sexual crimes are commited by muslim migrants

Actually the Qur'an is not the important book when considering the behavior of muslims.
Muhammed is not in the Qur'an, mentioned 4 times, and at least 3 could be someone else.
Ishaq and Taburi are far more important. They are Muhammeds biographies.

You have in the messenger a beautiful pattern of conduct to follow. ( Qur'an)

While most muslims do not commit the actual crimes the devoted followers do, they will still go along with it, as opposed to being branded as apostates.

 

Actually hundreds of examples, written in the books.

 

you can always count on this forum for having an endless array of Islamophobic hate threads

 

What I have found is that most muslims know little about the religion itself, instead depending on what their particular cleric and their peers say.
However these are time bombs, already brainwashed into what they believe is Islam.( If you pray to your car 5 times a day, you will brainwash yourself).

At any given time, the cleric can pull out the original writings, and have a large number of devotees at his command.

 

Instead of mindless comments, why don't you learn something about the religion.

 

Meanwhile, your ISIS friends sell 13 YO little girls into slavery.

Don't worry, there is less and less christian in western civilization, that's a good thing on one point : we don't have to forgive, turn the other cheek or love our ennemy, we can hate them from all our heat as they deserve.

I hate Islam and you hate europe, and ?

 

oh ho true is that...I don't know why they aren't all just mashed together..put all the crap in one bin

 

You can put freedom of speech in the bin in the same time.

 

On the contrary you are free to say what you like within the bounds of law and good taste just as I am free to disparage it.

 

Yes, it was always the case, even in the soviet union, you were free to say wht you like within the bounds of law, but the law prevented to criticize the government.

It's like in Mauritania, you're free to say what you liken within the bounds of law, if you blaspheme, you get death penalty.

Apparently, Canada and UK are creating law to put in prison people who criticize Islam. I'm not surprized.

 

Really....?? Are you perhaps conflating a number of issues to come to an absurd conclusion. If I was to say that I didn't like Islam - for example I don't like their view on some aspect of religious doctrine, then your view is that I would be arrested and imprisoned?

 

Then don't blaspheme....its' not difficult....

 

By blaspheme they mean critics, and it means too to sentence to death apostate, freedom of religion.

In the mind of leftist, there is no difference between criticism and call to murder. So yes, they won't categorize that as "criticism of islam" but the result would be same.

 

Ah you're one of those people who thinks all Muslims are guilty by association since they share a religion with the violent extremists and don't immediately drop everything in their lives to hunt down the extremists or something.

What is it you want them to do exactly? Say that blowing things up in the name of Allah is wrong? That goes without saying. Say that burqas are evil? Well they don't think they are evil and neither do a huuuuge majority of the women who wear them.

You're demanding they do things that humans don't typically do: get involved in and take a stance on something that doesn't directly effect them. And if they don't then in your book they are in the same boat as the extremists.

 

The religion, in writing, reads like a terrorist manual, yes, I think all muslims have to be held accountable to some extent.
Especially muslims in a free country, they are muslims by their own free will, nobody is holding a knife at their throats.

 

Are you still talking of the UK....what result, my imprisonment for discussing a theological point??
You seem to be flitting around...its hard to make any sense of your argument or point you are trying to make.

 

Its an interesting thought process you have going there....would that be like saying that because Andeas Bader and Ulrike Meinhoff were both German terrorists that makes all Germans terrorists?

 

Your implication being that every muslim must change their religion because they are no longer in another country?

 

Being german isn't belonging to an ideology, being muslim is.

 

Good answer!

 

Indeed....just as it does not make all Muslims terrorists....so basically all you seem to be left with is a silly one dimensional messianic view of the world.

 

In ww2 when we saw a Nazi, we shot them, we didn't stop to ask them " are you a good Nazi, or a bad Nazi, we just shot them.

 

My Implication is exactly what I wrote.
Nobody is forcing them to be a muslim, like in their old country, now they are a member of a terrorist ideology by their own free will.

 

Not all KKK members lynch blacks, some are fine people, with loving families.

 

I don't believe in any messiah. By the way, all muslims aren't the same, but there is only one quran, there is hadith. There is hundred and hundred sources that justify horrific things.

Three things that make me thing that Islam doesn't have it place in a lot of societies :
_ The quran encourage muslim to start a war when they're in a position of superiority, quran, Surate 47, verse 35
_ The quran call people who revere something else than Allah "worse than murderer", Surate 2, I don't recall the verse.
_ The quran encourage to kill polytheist wherever they find them.

I still don't understand why hindu or buddhic societies accept peopke who want to kill them and call them worse than murderer.