*Clicks the link in the OP* Quoted post at the top = fail. Correction, MASSIVE fail. It must suck to be him. Maybe one should click links if one wants to comment on something they know nothing about in the future, hmmm? Then one wouldn't humiliate themselves. Racial ignorance is so widespread on this forum...
The colour of their skin is irrelevant. Racism is so widespread on this forum. It seems the pathetic little bigots have nothing better to do than spread their hate online. Probably too scared to do it in the real world.
It has everything to do with race when the rapists are making it about race. I repeat, racial ignorance/inexperience is so widespread on this forum. It seems the pathetic little *******s have nothing better to do than point their slimy fingers from the comfort and safety of their all-White Australian neighborhoods at the people living right in the thick of the black crime epidemic. Probably too scared to take a trip to Detroit or Chicago and learn about the black "people" they claim to love so much first-hand.
The skin colour of the four alleged rapists is totally irrelevant. This fact seems to allude the uneducated bigots among us.
Why is this under "race relations"?...because of the black guys?, or the mexican? Isn't this a current event?
The skin color of the four evil rapists is totally relevant. This fact seems to allude the uneducated *******s among us.
Incorrect (again). White people may yell racial slurs at a Mexican. Pink people may yell racial slurs at a Mexican. Blue people may yell racial slurs at a Mexican. Yellow people may yell racial slurs at a Mexican. Black people may yell racial slurs at a Mexican. Brown people may yell racial slurs at a Mexican. However, the colour of the person making the racial slur is of no importance. To suggest otherwise is foolish in the extreme. Not a "fact", sorry. Now, just because you've been proven wrong there's no need to take your frustration out on other people. You are wrong, that's been proven, ... time to move on.
You are incorrect again. You're just not getting it. Four evil black rapists raped this poor old Mexican guy simply because he wasn't black like they were. If they weren't black or if the victim was black, this crime wouldn't have occurred. Do you understand now? I accept your apology. Now, because you've been proven wrong and have apologized to me, you may leave the thread as you clearly have nothing of substance to add. Time to move onto things you know at least a little about, hmmm?
You have evidence of this, or course? Hmmm? If not, man up and accept that you are 100% wrong. Their skin colour has nothing to do with it.
Yep. Sure do... http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/news/elderly-man-raped-socorro/nFT9K/ That's what drove the assault. That anger and hatred of all non-blacks was the fuel they needed to take it to the level it was taken to. If you were racially experienced and not cocooned in your non-black Perth existence, you'd know that and wouldn't need the obvious being explained to you like a failing schoolkid being spoken to by his teacher.
Sorry, that's only evidence that they yelled racial slurs. Nobody is denying that. Now, do you have evidence to support this claim: "If they weren't black or if the victim was black, this crime wouldn't have occurred." You don't, do you? Huh?
The fact remains that if they weren't black or if the victim was black, this crime wouldn't have occurred.
No. You gave evidence of racial slurs. Now, do you have evidence to support this claim: "If they weren't black or if the victim was black, this crime wouldn't have occurred."
Yeah, I gave you the evidence. Racially motivated slurs = racially motivated attack = victim was targeted because of his skin color. Everyone reading this knows exactly what I'm talking about. You really are humiliating yourself with the ignorance you're displaying here.
Nope. Incorrect, yet again. Your evidence only shows that they used racial slurs while carrying out the attack. It doesn't prove that the attack was racially motivated. You starting to understand now? This is basic stuff junior. You're honestly telling me you can't see the difference?
Listen real close, Sparky. I'll explain it to you really slowly, just so that YOU and ONLY you can understand. Okay? The use of racial slurs in a physical attack is as obvious that it's about race as a KKK mob lynching a black "man" while calling him the N word. Do you understand now, kiddo? Sheesh! Is there something in the water down under or something?? What's wrong with this kid?
No, it's not. It's merely an assumption. Now, do you have some evidence for your absurd claim? No more assumptions, just some evidence please.
