Fox News' honest mistake about Ron Paul

I only remembered this because of yesterdays lies about Tripoli, but this is worth attention and people should not forget:

Media shows us wrong footage "by mistake" : [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xpoTJoPBHk"]Bill Hemmer Apologizes for Fox News Ron Paul Hoax "It was an honest mistake" - YouTube[/ame]

I could believe it was an honest mistake if I didn't see this:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jZTd9j6_yg&playnext=1&list=PL9259CE03CDCA9571"]Ron Paul - The Smear Campaign - YouTube[/ame]

Or this:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9nOIusbDwI"]Jerry Day on Ron Paul and the Media - YouTube[/ame]

 

fox news is the devil..... haven't heard that before.

 

I think if the Rs pick Ron Paul for the veep spot, they win. BIG.

 

Who's rs? rick santorum? I would NOT vote for Ron Paul as vp. that would be an insulting joke. Ron Paul is on another level entirely from all other GOpers right now that I've seen

 

yeah the media is doing everything it can to stop ron paul from getting elected. The only reason Fox apologized is because people started posting it on the internet. Had they not been caught i doubt Fox would have said anything.

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VikC6jGxg78"]Fox News Apologizes for Airing Incorrect Palin Crowd Footage During Segment on Palin Book Tour - YouTube[/ame]

 

Even if the other GOP is parroting his stance of fiscal issues? The difference between RP and the TEA party runners is his view on social issues.

 

To me it is very evident: Ron Paul is real, GOP and tea party is a fraud. tea party is Ron Pauls afterbirth, or should I say a movement which started from Ron Pauls ideas, but without a leader and then derailed by fox news likes of Sarah Palin and Glen beck who are in reality AGAINST all that Ron Paul stands for. A FRAUD: and their newest puppet Rick Perry, when he said recently that "fed is ALMOST treasonous" this shows exactly what I mean. there is no such thing as almost treasonous, because it is simply as Ron Paul says, unconstitutional and should be abolished. but when this scum says its ALMOST treasonous, that is building grounds for later living with it, when it should be abolished for obvious reasons.

 

The media can't tell us what to think anymore. The internet changed all that, and Ron Paul is a hero and mentor now.

Fred Thompson...ROFL. Where is Thompson now and where is Ron Paul now?

I've always appreciated Mr. Paul. He's a real patriot, the real deal.

 

Insulting to Ron? Not at all.

It's good strategy too. I think it'd be his best way to become president.

 

FOX News make no mistakes they lie a lot and do so on purpose. Mistakes are what they call their lies when they get caught.

 

I think Ron Paul is "ok" at best.

The Tea Party is 10x more relivent then Paul ever could be

So Ron Pauls after birth is a fraud huh....

Ya... and the internet was started from Al Gores ideas

Where was Ron Pauls leadership? Afterall, the Tea Party came from his ideas...

I too am against pulling our forces out of the worlds trouble spots at the very time we should be ramping up and kicking ass

I think the fed is run by global socialist who want America "evened out"

 

I think there's a good chance you're right about that.

Che'bama sure believes in the globalist/socialist thing.

 

Ron Paul has been stedfast in his ideas for 30+ years.

Cause of the media.

Yes, corrupted by social conservatives and more progressive connidates that are using the movement to establish their power.

Ron Paul didn't invent this way of thinking, he just believes that what constitution says is what we should follow.

He doesn't want to co-op any followership. Those that follow RP do so because we believe he will stay with his ideas without being forced to follow the toe-line.

And this makes you a bully or a nanny state promoter. You don't like us to have a nanny state, but have no problem with the US being the nanny for the entire world.

Hense the principle RP has stood for for over 30 years even though he is a "kook".

 

I can easily tell.

 

Like I said, Ron Paul is OK in my book, but not my guy. If I was running for president, I wouldn't take money from Nazi's for ex.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html

The media has set out to destroy the Tea Party and has been smearing the crap out of it sence the day it started.

I'll give you Glen Beck. He is a perfect exsample of what you are talking about here. He is a giant d-bag in my opinion. I think you would be suprised how many Tea Party folks like Ron Paul. Ron Paul isn't a bad dude, he just isn't president material. Thats my opinion.

I agree

Well then he ain't much of a leader then is he. A leader takes the rains and steers. The Tea Party has no leader.

He is "ok". If you like him and support him.... thats great.

standing up for freedom in the world is our responcablity. Ignoring the Sadam Hussain types in the world will only lead to bigger conflicts later on.

The world needs our help. People like Kadafee need to be stood up to.

Pulling all are armys back to secure the border will not only keep people out, but will also make sure people can't leave. Open boarders are really important. You wanna build a berlin wall around America.

 

This is OUR version of freedom, not the worlds. Just like OUR version of democricy is a republic, but we have instituted dictatorships around the world. Sadam was the reason Iran hadn't tried for the nuke before.

Just like the freeloaders and welfare generation needed our governments help too right? Quadaffi was being stood up to, and it was a civil war. How would you have liked it if someone had helped the south susceed from the Union cause they felt it was their duty to stand for our "rebels"? What happens if the Unions following Maxine Waters rise up and try to "send the TEA party to hell" when they win more seats in 2012? Will you be ok with EU standing with whom they think is in the right when it is a situation within our own borders? What gives us the right to interfere with other countries affairs? Who are we to say we know best? Who are the rebels that are standing up to Qudaffi? Are they the same people that are attacking Isreal from Egypt?

We aren't worried about people leaving or entering LEGALLY, but those that sneak across in the dead of night smuggling drugs and weapons. Our forces spread across the world would easily be able to cover our defence of the souther border and cost less in the long run cause the pay for those stationed overseas is huge compared to living in the states.

 

Exactly,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

Thanks for starting this thread. America NEEDS Ron Paul. We are in such a mess and it's not just the economy. I don't see much hope in supporting the other R's...they will just tinker with the FUBAR system that's already in place. Ron Paul is the ONLY one that will work to give this country back to its owners....the PEOPLE!

Ron Paul in 2012!!

 

Is there a reason why you havent joined up to fight in these 'trouble spots'?

I know it's lot easier and safer to send others to do the fighting but when a person seems so 'ramboesque' it really is surprising that he isn't foaming at the mouth to get in on the action.

 

My best friend joined. he served in Iraq and was about to go to Afghanistan. but then he found a job so he's working now.

 

No matter what kind of videos I see of Ron Paul, I just can't bring myself to like him. Even on issues where I agree.

 

He reminds me of one of an old wino - bad breath and horrible body odour. A poster boy for Conservative charity organizations.

 

Bill O'Reilly, on hearing Ron Paul claim the media is ignoring him, invited him to appear on The Factor. He's not returning their calls. On last night's show, someone mentioned the reason Ron Paul won't come on with O'Reilly is because he'd have to answer tough questions... where he prefers to just speak, unchallenged.

Where have we seen that kind of avoidance before?

Oh yeah, Barack H. Obama.

 

Ron Paul claims he was treat disrespectfully. And Ron actually answers all the time, but just like when he appeared on Becks show, he will probably be cut off if the entire show isn't devoted to him answering questions the way he does, by explaining his answers and not giving general vague sound bites like "hope and change". Hope for what and change to what?