Free Speech is not Violated at Wellesley

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Space_Time, Apr 15, 2017.

  1. Space_Time

    Space_Time Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2015
    Messages:
    12,578
    Likes Received:
    1,984
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh really? The question again is who decides what is hate speech. What kind of 'educating' are they proposing?

    http://thewellesleynews.com/2017/04/12/free-speech-is-not-violated-at-wellesley/

    BY THEWELLESLEYNEWS OPINIONSAPRIL 12, 2017
    FREE SPEECH IS NOT VIOLATED AT WELLESLEY
    Graphic by Jee Lee '19, Digital Editor
    Many members of our community, including students, alumnae and faculty, have criticized the Wellesley community for becoming an environment where free speech is not allowed or is a violated right. Many outside sources have painted us as a bunch of hot house flowers who cannot exist in the real world. However, we fundamentally disagree with that characterization, and we disagree with the idea that free speech is infringed upon at Wellesley. Rather, our Wellesley community will not stand for hate speech, and will call it out when possible.

    Wellesley students are generally correct in their attempts to differentiate what is viable discourse from what is just hate speech. Wellesley is certainly not a place for racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, transphobia or any other type of discriminatory speech. Shutting down rhetoric that undermines the existence and rights of others is not a violation of free speech; it is hate speech. The founding fathers put free speech in the Constitution as a way to protect the disenfranchised and to protect individual citizens from the power of the government. The spirit of free speech is to protect the suppressed, not to protect a free-for-all where anything is acceptable, no matter how hateful and damaging.

    This being said, the tone surrounding the current discourse is becoming increasingly hostile. Wellesley College is an institution whose aim is to educate. Students who come to Wellesley hail from a variety of diverse backgrounds. With this diversity comes previously-held biases that are in part the products of home environments. Wellesley forces us to both recognize and grow from these beliefs, as is the mark of a good college education. However, as students, it is important to recognize that this process does not occur without bumps along the way. It is inevitable that there will be moments in this growth process where mistakes will happen and controversial statements will be said. However, we argue that these questionable claims should be mitigated by education as opposed to personal attacks.

    We have all said problematic claims, the origins of which were ingrained in us by our discriminatory and biased society. Luckily, most of us have been taught by our peers and mentors at Wellesley in a productive way. It is vital that we encourage people to correct and learn from their mistakes rather than berate them for a lack of education they could not control. While it is expected that these lessons will be difficult and often personal, holding difficult conversations for the sake of educating is very different from shaming on the basis of ignorance.

    This being said, if people are given the resources to learn and either continue to speak hate speech or refuse to adapt their beliefs, then hostility may be warranted. If people continue to support racist politicians or pay for speakers that prop up speech that will lead to the harm of others, then it is critical to take the appropriate measures to hold them accountable for their actions. It is important to note that our preference for education over beration regards students who may have not been given the chance to learn. Rather, we are not referring to those who have already had the incentive to learn and should have taken the opportunities to do so. Paid professional lecturers and politicians are among those who should know better.

    We at The Wellesley News, are not interested in any type of tone policing. The emotional labor required to educate people is immense and is additional weight that is put on those who are already forced to defend their human rights. There is no denying that problematic opinions need to be addressed in order to stop Wellesley from becoming a place where hate speech and casual discrimination is okay. However, as a community we need to make an effort to have this dialogue in a constructive and educational way in order to build our community up. Talk-back, protest videos and personal correspondences are also ways to have a constructive dialogue. Let us first bridge the gap between students in our community before we resort to personal attacks. Our student body is not only smart, it is also kind. Let us demonstrate that through productive dialogue.
     
  2. Space_Time

    Space_Time Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2015
    Messages:
    12,578
    Likes Received:
    1,984
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here's more:

    http://nypost.com/2017/04/15/the-campus-thought-police-want-you-to-feel-sorry-for-them/The campus thought police want you to feel sorry for them
    By Post Editorial Board April 15, 2017 | 10:29pm
    Modal Trigger The campus thought police want you to feel sorry for them
    Wellesley College Getty Images
    The editors of the Wellesley News last week managed to quite nicely sum up the idiocy sweeping America’s campuses, writing, “Shutting down rhetoric that undermines the existence and rights of others is not a violation of free speech.”

    Actually, that’s exactly what it is.

    Wait, the editorial says: “The founding fathers put free speech into the Constitution as a way to protect the disenfranchised and to protect individual citizens from the power of government.

    The spirit of free speech is to protect the suppressed, not to protect a free-for-all where anything is acceptable, no matter how hateful and damaging.”

    Yes, the Constitution limits what the government can do. But free speech is precisely about protecting a “free-for-all” — where those you deem hateful get their say, and you have the chance to debunk and expose them.

    In any case, the ones who are “suppressed” on most US campuses today are the voices that the Wellesley women want to silence: anyone who presents facts and ideas that challenge progressive dogma.

    Sadly, the students are learning from their professors. The six faculty on the school’s Presidential Commission on Race, Ethnicity, and Equity recently wrote that controversial speakers are exhausting the poor kids: “The speakers in question impose on the liberty of students, staff, and faculty at Wellesley.”

    Specifically, students must “invest time and energy in rebutting the speakers’ arguments . . . This work is not optional; students feel they would be unable to carry out their responsibilities as students without standing up for themselves.”

    That’s right: Having to work to rebut someone else’s argument is an injury. (It only used to be what college was all about.)

    Mind you, the Wellesley News editors grant that some kids come to college ignorant of the truth, and shouldn’t be shouted down immediately. “If people are given the resources to learn and either continue to speak hate speech or refuse to adapt their beliefs, then hostility may be warranted,” the editorial reads.

    In other words, education is now all about indoctrination — with stubborn holdouts subject to denunciation and, implicitly, violence.

    After all this, the righteous editorialists express a bit of self-pity: “The emotional labor required to educate people is immense and is additional weight that is put on those who are already forced to defend their human rights.”

    Whoever said the thought police had it easy?
     
  3. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,640
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thus, we see what the left -really- thinks of "free speech" - you only have the right to it if they aren't offended by it.
     

Share This Page