Freedom From War - "The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament...

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by Watchman, Nov 17, 2012.

  1. Watchman

    Watchman New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I posted this information in a thread I started in the "Gun Control" Section of the Forum, titled, "U.N. Small Arms Treaty / Arms Trade Treaty Not Dead"

    I stood alone, and most likely, I will continue to stand alone. I continually posted links, sources, video, provisions, etc., and NOT one of them were refuted by other debaters. NOT one link to refute the information I gave.

    Some said, "Oh, he listed infowars or Alex Jones. I doubt you'll get a reasonable discussion from him."

    Remember that statement.

    "IF YOU NEED PROOF THAT OUR PUBLIC OFFICIALS ARE PLANNING TO TAKE AWAY ALL FIREARMS AND PUT OUR ENTIRE U. S. ARMED FORCES UNDER COMMUNIST CONTROL -- go to these Internet sites for proof from U.S. Government sources."

    http://www.libertygunrights.com/NewVol9_3.pdf

    http://www.state.gov/t/isn/ndf/index.htm

    http://billingsgazette.com/news/opin...569cdd974.html

    http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

    http://www.infowars.com/un-gun-grab-...partment-plan/


    This is NO conspiracy theory. These are the hard FACTS and TRUTHS. Many people don't like to face or deal with the hard
    FACTS and TRUTHS. They'd rather ignore them, and pretend they don't exist.

    TRUTH really is stranger than fiction.

    Happy reading.

    This definitely makes it easier to connect all of the dots, from September 1961 to the present, and what we're facing today as a Nation.

    Everything has been coming together and is continuing to come together for this purpose.

    "Freedom From War - 'The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World'"

    http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

    This was released in September 1961.

    They have been establishing and implementing this in increments ever since.

    They're almost finished.

    This Arms Trade Treaty / Small Arms Treaty may be the last ditch effort to do this fascist crap.

    http://www.libertygunrights.com/NewVol9_3.pdf

    http://www.state.gov/t/isn/ndf/index.htm

    http://billingsgazette.com/news/opin...569cdd974.html

    http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

    http://www.infowars.com/un-gun-grab-...partment-plan/

    I put Alex Jones Infowars last because many say and blow him and his readers and listeners off as tin foil hat, paranoid, delusional conspiracy theorists.

    All of the sudden, he's NOT so crazy after all, is he?! Hhmmm.

    Almost everything he's been saying since the 90s, way before I even heard of him, has been happening and occuring within our Nation.

    He's done his homework and research and investigations. He's one of the only reporters and journalists that puts his life on the line, to expose the real, hard truths and facts, exposing darkness, corruption, and tyranny.

    Some people really just cannot handle the TRUTH.

    "Oh, this is just more of that paranoid delusional, tin foil hat, conspiracy theory nut case crap."

    Don't pay ANY attention. There's NO sinister plan for any of this to take place. None of this would dare usurp or have any effect on U.S. Constitutional Law. None whatsoever.

    YEAH, RIGHT!!!
     
  2. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    a constitutional amendment is needed for an outright ban of firearms.

    stop getting your information from alex jones, WND, infowars and youtube and you won't look like such a fool.
     
  3. Hate_bs

    Hate_bs New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The model for a total ban on guns is being tested with the new proposed 'assault weapon ban'. What they will do is 'let you keep your guns' but forbid you from buying more and forbid future generations from buying any.
     
  4. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    not possible. a constitutional amendment is needed for an outright ban of firearms. See DC vs Hellar
     
  5. Watchman

    Watchman New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Up to your old tricks again, are you, mr. rahl?


    http://www.libertygunrights.com/NewVol9_3.pdf

    http://www.state.gov/t/isn/ndf/index.htm

    http://billingsgazette.com/news/opin...569cdd974.html

    http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

    http://www.infowars.com/un-gun-grab-...partment-plan/

    I put Alex Jones Infowars last because many say and blow him and his readers and listeners off as tin foil hat, paranoid, delusional conspiracy theorists.

    All of the sudden, he's NOT so crazy after all, is he?! Hhmmm.

    Did you visit any of the above links?

    No doubt you didn't even do as I requested, and you responded without reading the above post, or visiting any of the links.

    NO link to world net daily. NO link to Youtube.

    One link to Alex Jones infowars, that I purposely posted last, once again, to prove and make a point that what I have been saying all along are indeed facts and truths.

    I put Alex Jones Infowars last because many say and blow him and his readers and listeners off as tin foil hat, paranoid, delusional conspiracy theorists.

    All of the sudden, he's NOT so crazy after all, is he?! Hhmmm.

    You need to go back and read the ENTIRE post before responding, and visit the above links.

    "a constitutional amendment is needed for an outright ban of firearms."- rahl

    Then why are they going to do it through international treaty, mr. rahl?!

    I continue to remain unrefuted.
     
  6. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've already refuted this stupidity
     
  7. Hate_bs

    Hate_bs New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0

    See present text of the 'Assault Weapon Ban'.

    They ban semi-auto look alikes from future generations. Which in effect is a ban for everyone.

    This is the model for future legislation on other guns. It is not new. This is how it was done in other countries.
     
  8. Wolverine

    Wolverine New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2006
    Messages:
    16,105
    Likes Received:
    234
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Info Wars.

    Sounds like legit.
     
  9. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    irrelevant. a constitutional amendment is needed for an outright ban on firearms. see DC vs Hellar.
     
  10. Watchman

    Watchman New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You say irrelevant because you can't back up your statement.

    You have NO proof, NONE whatsoever.

    I have listed and posted provision after provision, link after link, and videos proving and showing otherwise, mr. rahl.

    Let me guess, Alex Jones, Info Wars, World Net Daily, and Youtube are not credible sources, right?

    I have listed many other links, sources, provisions, and videos that were NOT part of the above, and you continue to NOT refute.

    Why is that, mr. rahl?!

    Everything has been and continues to be unrefuted by you.

    You can post, "a constitutional amendment is needed for an outright ban on firearms," until your fingers fall off.

    The facts and truths of the matter is, quite the contrary, and been proven otherwise.
     
  11. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    none of your paranoid stupidity changes the fact that a constitutional amendment is needed for an outright ban on firearms. this is settled law. I've provided US supreme court precedent(DC vs Hellar). You provide alex jones, WND, infowars and youtube.

    You need to argue with the supreme court, because they've called bull(*)(*)(*)(*) on your idiotic arguments.
     
  12. Watchman

    Watchman New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, and the supreme court justices, the majority are traitors and fascists.

    I don't think I'll be talking to them any time soon.

    NO SIR.
     
  13. Watchman

    Watchman New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OUT-FREAKIN-STANDING!!!

    http://www.starspangledbannerchallenge.com/ You won't be able to stay seated when you watch and listen.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGeFn5utrwM Alex Jones on secession

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q03cWio-zjk Congressman Ron Paul's Farewell Speech - Tells the FACTS and TRUTHS about what's been going on in America; tyranny and fascism.
     
  14. Watchman

    Watchman New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah!!! :)
     
  15. Margot

    Margot Account closed, not banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    62,072
    Likes Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    UN small arms control has NOTHING to do with gun rights in the US.
     
  16. Watchman

    Watchman New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    On the very surface level, No.

    You'll see. :)
     
  17. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ..............
     
  18. Watchman

    Watchman New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    867
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "You need to argue with the supreme court, because they've called bull(*)(*)(*)(*) on your idiotic arguments."- rahl

    Yeah, and the majority are corrupt, controlled, and bought off.

    They wouldn't tell the truth. Just like the majority of our politicians.

    At least watch the Ron Paul farewell address speech to Congress.
     
  19. ballantine

    ballantine Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    5,297
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Good luck, Watchman. Maybe we'll see each other at the barricades. :)
     
  20. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so the conservatives on the high court are corrupt because they upheld the US constitution via the second amendment and called bull(*)(*)(*)(*) on your idiotic conspiracy theories?
     

Share This Page